Service of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Department of Surgery, EOC, Lugano, Switzerland.
Clinica Ortopedica e Traumatologica 2, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2024 Feb;32(2):311-322. doi: 10.1002/ksa.12057. Epub 2024 Jan 31.
To quantify the clinical relevance of intra-articular corticosteroid effects compared to placebo for the injective treatment of knee osteoarthritis (OA).
The PubMed, Cochrane Library and Web of Science databases were searched on May 3, 2023. This study was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. The inclusion criteria were randomized controlled trials (RCTs), published in English, with no time limitation regarding publication date, comparing intra-articular corticosteroids and placebo injections for knee OA. The effects were quantified at short- (≤6 weeks), mid- (>6 weeks and ≤3 months), and long-term (≥6 months) follow-ups. The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the outcomes (visual analogue scale for pain - VAS: 1.4, Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index - WOMAC: 9) was used to interpret the clinical improvement provided by intra-articular corticosteroid injections compared to placebo. The quality of each article was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool and the GRADE guidelines.
Among the 1030 articles retrieved, 11 RCTs (842 patients) were included. A comparison of the two groups revealed statistically significant differences in the improvement of VAS and WOMAC scores in terms of the mean difference (MD); this difference was in favour of corticosteroids at short-term (p < 0.001, MD = -1.6 and p < 0.001, MD = -9.9, respectively) and mid-term follow-ups (p = 0.001, mean MD = -1.3 and p = 0.005, MD = -4.9, respectively). No difference was observed at the long-term follow-up. The MDs between the improvements in the two groups reached the MCID values for the VAS and WOMAC only at the short-term follow-up. The RoB 2 tool and the GRADE evaluations showed the presence of risk of bias and limited quality of evidence.
This systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrated that intra-articular corticosteroid injections offer clinically perceivable pain relief and functional improvement higher than the placebo effect only at short-term follow-up in patients affected by knee OA, with benefits losing clinical relevance already after 6 weeks. These results, together with the low number and the limited quality of the RCTs comparing this treatment with placebo, question the indication for the use of corticosteroid injections in clinical practice for the treatment of knee OA.
Level I.
定量评估关节内皮质类固醇与安慰剂相比在膝关节骨关节炎(OA)注射治疗中的临床相关性。
于 2023 年 5 月 3 日检索 PubMed、Cochrane Library 和 Web of Science 数据库。本研究遵循 PRISMA 指南进行。纳入标准为随机对照试验(RCT),发表于英语文献,无时间限制(出版日期),比较关节内皮质类固醇和安慰剂注射治疗膝关节 OA。在短期(≤6 周)、中期(>6 周和≤3 个月)和长期(≥6 个月)随访时评估疗效。采用最小临床重要差异(MCID)(视觉模拟评分法疼痛- VAS:1.4,西部安大略省和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数- WOMAC:9)来解释与安慰剂相比关节内皮质类固醇注射提供的临床改善。使用 Cochrane RoB 2 工具和 GRADE 指南评估每篇文章的质量。
在检索到的 1030 篇文章中,纳入了 11 项 RCT(842 名患者)。两组之间的比较显示,在 VAS 和 WOMAC 评分的平均差异(MD)方面,改善具有统计学意义,这种差异有利于皮质类固醇在短期(p<0.001,MD=-1.6 和 p<0.001,MD=-9.9)和中期随访(p=0.001,MD=-1.3 和 p=0.005,MD=-4.9)。在长期随访时没有观察到差异。只有在短期随访时,两组之间的改善差异达到了 VAS 和 WOMAC 的 MCID 值。RoB 2 工具和 GRADE 评估显示存在偏倚风险和证据质量有限。
本系统评价和荟萃分析表明,在膝关节 OA 患者中,与安慰剂相比,关节内皮质类固醇注射仅在短期随访时可提供可临床感知的疼痛缓解和功能改善,且在 6 周后疗效丧失临床相关性。这些结果,再加上比较这种治疗与安慰剂的 RCT 数量较少且质量有限,对皮质类固醇注射治疗膝关节 OA 的临床应用指征提出了质疑。
I 级。