Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37 Guo Xue Alley, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China.
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2024 Jan 31;150(2):58. doi: 10.1007/s00432-023-05575-4.
The purpose of this study was to compare the antitumor efficacy of anlotinib with gemcitabine-based chemotherapy as subsequent treatment regimens in patients with advanced non-specific soft tissue sarcoma (STS) after the failure of anthracycline-based chemotherapy.
Patients diagnosed with advanced STS who were treated with either anlotinib or gemcitabine-based chemotherapy between May 2009 and May 2023 in our center were eligible. All patients experienced disease progression or recurrence after the anthracycline-based chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints were disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS) and safety.
We included 49 patients receiving anlotinib and 45 patients receiving gemcitabine-based chemotherapy. The median follow-up time was 76.9 weeks (range 2.9-678.9 weeks). The DCR (65.3% vs. 57.8%; p = 0.610), PFS (24.0 weeks vs. 18.6 weeks; p = 0.669) and OS (79.4 weeks vs. 87.0 weeks; p = 0.471) of anlotinib and gemcitabine-based chemotherapy indicated similar clinical efficacy. Moreover, exploratory subgroup analyses showed that patients with STS originating from limbs and trunk were inclined to benefit from anlotinib treatment (median PFS: 31.3 weeks vs. 12.4 weeks; p = 0.045). ECOG PS was an independent predictor of the PFS [Hazard Ratio (HR) 0.31; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.11-0.85; p = 0.023] and OS (HR 0.26, 95%CI 0.10-0.70; p = 0.008) in the anlotinib group. While neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) was an independent prognostic factor of the PFS (HR 0.33, 95%CI 0.11-0.98; p = 0.045) in the gemcitabine-based chemotherapy group. The incidence of grade 3 or higher related AEs in anlotinib and gemcitabine-based chemotherapy was 20.4% (n = 10) and 20.0% (n = 9), respectively.
Our research suggested that anlotinib and gemcitabine-based chemotherapy showed similar clinical efficacy and safety in the subsequent treatment of advanced STS after the failure of anthracycline-based chemotherapy.
本研究旨在比较安罗替尼与基于吉西他滨的化疗作为蒽环类化疗失败后晚期非特异性软组织肉瘤(STS)患者的后续治疗方案的抗肿瘤疗效。
2009 年 5 月至 2023 年 5 月期间,在本中心接受安罗替尼或基于吉西他滨的化疗的晚期 STS 患者符合入组条件。所有患者在蒽环类化疗后均出现疾病进展或复发。主要终点为无进展生存期(PFS)。次要终点为疾病控制率(DCR)、总生存期(OS)和安全性。
我们纳入了 49 例接受安罗替尼治疗和 45 例接受基于吉西他滨的化疗的患者。中位随访时间为 76.9 周(范围 2.9-678.9 周)。安罗替尼和基于吉西他滨的化疗的 DCR(65.3% vs. 57.8%;p=0.610)、PFS(24.0 周 vs. 18.6 周;p=0.669)和 OS(79.4 周 vs. 87.0 周;p=0.471)相似。此外,探索性亚组分析显示,起源于四肢和躯干的 STS 患者更倾向于从安罗替尼治疗中获益(中位 PFS:31.3 周 vs. 12.4 周;p=0.045)。ECOG PS 是安罗替尼组 PFS [风险比(HR)0.31;95%置信区间(CI)0.11-0.85;p=0.023]和 OS(HR 0.26,95%CI 0.10-0.70;p=0.008)的独立预测因素。而中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)是基于吉西他滨的化疗组 PFS 的独立预后因素(HR 0.33,95%CI 0.11-0.98;p=0.045)。安罗替尼和基于吉西他滨的化疗的 3 级或以上相关 AE 发生率分别为 20.4%(n=10)和 20.0%(n=9)。
本研究表明,在蒽环类化疗失败后,安罗替尼与基于吉西他滨的化疗在晚期 STS 的后续治疗中显示出相似的临床疗效和安全性。