CHU de Poitiers, Service de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Poitiers, France; INSERM CIC 1402, IS-ALIVE Research Group, Université de Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
CHU de Poitiers, Service de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Poitiers, France.
Chest. 2024 Jun;165(6):1406-1414. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2024.01.038. Epub 2024 Jan 29.
Reconnection to the ventilator for 1 h following a successful spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) may reduce reintubation rates compared with direct extubation. However, the physiologic mechanisms leading to this effect are unclear.
Does reconnection to the ventilator for 1 h reverse alveolar derecruitment induced by SBT, and is alveolar derecruitment more pronounced with a T-piece than with pressure-support ventilation (PSV)?
This is an ancillary study of a randomized clinical trial comparing SBT performed with a T-piece or with PSV. Alveolar recruitment was assessed by using measurement of end-expiratory lung volume (EELV).
Of the 25 patients analyzed following successful SBT, 11 underwent SBT with a T-piece and 14 with PSV. At the end of the SBT, EELV decreased by -30% (95% CI, -37 to -23) compared with baseline prior to the SBT. This reduction was greater with a T-piece than with PSV: -43% (95% CI, -51 to -35) vs -20% (95% CI, -26 to -13); P < .001. Following reconnection to the ventilator for 1 h, EELV accounted for 96% (95% CI, 92 to 101) of baseline EELV and did not significantly differ from prior to the SBT (P = .104). Following 10 min of reconnection to the ventilator, EELV wasted at the end of the SBT was completely recovered using PSV (P = .574), whereas it remained lower than prior to the SBT using a T-piece (P = .010).
Significant alveolar derecruitment was observed at the end of an SBT and was markedly more pronounced with a T-piece than with PSV. Reconnection to the ventilator for 1 h allowed complete recovery of alveolar derecruitment.
ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT04227639; URL: www.
gov.
与直接拔管相比,在成功自主呼吸试验(SBT)后重新连接呼吸机 1 小时可能会降低再插管率。然而,导致这种效果的生理机制尚不清楚。
重新连接呼吸机 1 小时是否可以逆转 SBT 引起的肺泡去复张,并且 T 型管比压力支持通气(PSV)引起的肺泡去复张更明显?
这是一项比较 T 型管或 PSV 进行 SBT 的随机临床试验的辅助研究。通过测量呼气末肺容积(EELV)评估肺泡复张情况。
在成功进行 SBT 后分析的 25 名患者中,11 名患者进行了 T 型管 SBT,14 名患者进行了 PSV SBT。在 SBT 结束时,EELV 与 SBT 前的基础值相比下降了-30%(95%CI,-37 至-23)。与 PSV 相比,T 型管的降幅更大:-43%(95%CI,-51 至-35)比-20%(95%CI,-26 至-13);P<.001。重新连接呼吸机 1 小时后,EELV 占基础 EELV 的 96%(95%CI,92 至 101),与 SBT 前相比无显著差异(P=.104)。重新连接呼吸机 10 分钟后,PSV 完全恢复了 SBT 结束时的 EELV 浪费(P=.574),而使用 T 型管时 EELV 仍低于 SBT 前(P=.010)。
在 SBT 结束时观察到明显的肺泡去复张,并且 T 型管比 PSV 更为明显。重新连接呼吸机 1 小时可完全恢复肺泡去复张。
ClinicalTrials.gov;编号:NCT04227639;网址:www.clinicaltrials.gov。
ClinicalTrials.gov。