Ye Xiaomei, Waters David, Yu Hong-Jing
Intensive Care Unit, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
School of Nursing and Midwifery, Birmingham City University, Birmingham, UK.
Nurs Crit Care. 2023 Jan;28(1):120-132. doi: 10.1111/nicc.12781. Epub 2022 Jun 1.
A spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) is recommended to help patients to liberate themselves from mechanical ventilation as soon as possible in the ICU. The respiratory workload in SBT, which depends on being with or without respiratory support and a specific time, is more accurate to reflect how much support the weaning patients need compared with only considering SBT technologies.
To compare and rank the effectiveness of different respiratory workloads during SBT via differing technologies (Pressure Support Ventilation and T-piece) and differing duration (30 and 120 min) in SBTs.
A comprehensive literature search was performed in six English electronic databases to identify eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published before September 2020. The pooled risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated by Markov chain Monte Carlo methods. A Bayesian network meta-analysis was conducted using "gemtc" version 0.8.2 of R software. Each intervention's ranking possibilities were calculated using the surface under the cumulative ranking analysis (SUCRA).
A total of nine RCTs including 3115 participants were eligible for this network meta-analysis involving four different commonly used SBT strategies and four outcomes. The only statistically significant difference was between Pressure Support Ventilation (PSV) 30 min and T-piece 120 min in the outcome of the rate of success in SBTs (RR = 0.91; 95% CI, 0.84-0.98). The cumulative rank probability showed that the rate of success in SBT from best to worst was PSV 30 min, PSV 120 min, T-piece 30 min and T-piece 120 min. PSV 30 min and PSV 120 min are more likely to have a higher rate of extubation (SUCRA values of 82.5% for 30 min PSV, 70.7% for 120 min PSV, 36.4% for T-piece 30 min, 10.4% for T-piece 120). Meanwhile, T-piece 120 min (SUCRA, 62.9%) and PSV 120 min (SUCRA, 60.9%) may result in lower reintubation rates, followed by T-piece 30 min (SUCRA, 41.8%) and PSV 30 min (SUCRA, 34.4%).
In comprehensive consideration of four outcomes, regarding SBT strategies, 30-min PSV was superior in simple-to-wean patients. Besides, 120-min T-piece and 120-min PSV are more likely to achieve a lower reintubation rate. Thus, the impact of duration is more significant among patients who have a high risk of reintubation. It is still unclear whether the SBTs affect the outcome of mortality; further studies may need to explore the underlying mechanism.
在重症监护病房(ICU),建议进行自主呼吸试验(SBT)以帮助患者尽快脱离机械通气。与仅考虑SBT技术相比,SBT中的呼吸负荷更能准确反映撤机患者所需的支持量,其取决于是否有呼吸支持及特定时间。
通过不同技术(压力支持通气和T管)及不同持续时间(30分钟和120分钟)的SBT,比较并排序不同呼吸负荷的有效性。
在六个英文电子数据库中进行全面文献检索,以识别2020年9月之前发表的符合条件的随机对照试验(RCT)。采用马尔可夫链蒙特卡罗方法计算合并风险比(RR)及95%置信区间(CI)。使用R软件的“gemtc”0.8.2版本进行贝叶斯网络荟萃分析。通过累积排序分析下的面积(SUCRA)计算每种干预措施的排序可能性。
共有9项RCT(包括3115名参与者)符合该网络荟萃分析的条件,涉及四种不同的常用SBT策略和四个结局。唯一具有统计学意义的差异是在SBT成功率结局方面,压力支持通气(PSV)30分钟与T管120分钟之间(RR = 0.91;95% CI,0.84 - 0.98)。累积排序概率显示,SBT成功率从高到低依次为PSV 30分钟、PSV 120分钟、T管30分钟和T管120分钟。PSV 30分钟和PSV 120分钟更有可能具有较高的拔管率(30分钟PSV的SUCRA值为82.5%,120分钟PSV为70.7%,T管干预30分钟为36.4%,T管干预120分钟为10.4%)。同时,T管120分钟(SUCRA,62.9%)和PSV 120分钟(SUCRA,60.9%)可能导致较低的再插管率,其次是T管30分钟(SUCRA,41.8%)和PSV 30分钟(SUCRA,34.4%)。
综合考虑四个结局,对于SBT策略,30分钟的PSV在易于撤机的患者中更具优势。此外,120分钟的T管和120分钟的PSV更有可能实现较低的再插管率。因此,在再插管风险较高的患者中,持续时间的影响更为显著。SBT是否影响死亡率结局仍不清楚;可能需要进一步研究探索其潜在机制。