• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

近端优化技术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗左主干病变:POTENTIAL-LM研究

Proximal optimization technique and percutaneous coronary intervention for left main disease: POTENTIAL-LM.

作者信息

Volet Corentin, Puricel Serban, Cook Selma T, di Cicco Philippe, Faucherre Yannick, Arroyo Diego, Togni Mario, Cook Stéphane

机构信息

Cardiology, University & Hospital Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland.

出版信息

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 Feb;103(3):417-424. doi: 10.1002/ccd.30961. Epub 2024 Jan 31.

DOI:10.1002/ccd.30961
PMID:38297989
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Optimal stent deployment in left main (LM) bifurcation is paramount, and incomplete stent apposition may cause major adverse cardiac events (MACE). Bench studies show that the proximal optimization technique (POT) provides the best stent apposition.

AIMS

We aimed to investigate the impact of POT on clinical outcomes in patients treated for unprotected LM (ULM) disease at our institution.

METHODS

We identified 162 patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ULM coronary disease in the Cardio-FR database. Out of these, 99 (61%) had undergone POT, while 63 patients were treated without POT. The primary outcome was the bifurcation-oriented composite endpoint (BOCE) of cardiac death, target-bifurcation myocardial infarction and target-bifurcation revascularization at maximal follow-up.

RESULTS

Mean age was 76 years, and 69% presented with acute coronary syndrome. Mean follow-up was 2.25 years (822 days). The BOCE occurred in 43 (27%) of which 20 (20%) in the POT group and 23 (37%) in the no-POT group (p = 0.009). Cardiac death occurred in 15 (15%) patients in the POT- and 17 (27%) in no-POT group (p = 0.26). Target bifurcation revascularization occurred in 4 (4%) patients in the POT- and 6 (10%) patients in the no-POT group (p = 0.19). POT In the multivariate analysis, POT was the strongest parameter and was associated with BOCE, cardiac death, occurrence of any revascularization and all-cause mortality.

CONCLUSION

The POT improves clinical outcomes. These findings strongly support the systematic use of POT in patients undergoing ULM-PCI.

摘要

背景

左主干(LM)分叉处支架的最佳置入至关重要,支架贴壁不全可能导致主要不良心脏事件(MACE)。体外研究表明,近端优化技术(POT)可实现最佳的支架贴壁。

目的

我们旨在研究POT对我院接受无保护左主干(ULM)疾病治疗患者临床结局的影响。

方法

我们在Cardio-FR数据库中确定了162例因ULM冠状动脉疾病接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的患者。其中,99例(61%)接受了POT,而63例患者未接受POT治疗。主要结局是最大随访时的心脏死亡、靶分叉心肌梗死和靶分叉血运重建的分叉导向复合终点(BOCE)。

结果

平均年龄为76岁,69%的患者表现为急性冠状动脉综合征。平均随访时间为2.25年(822天)。43例(27%)发生了BOCE,其中POT组20例(20%),非POT组23例(37%)(p = 0.009)。POT组15例(15%)患者发生心脏死亡,非POT组17例(27%)(p = 0.26)。POT组4例(4%)患者发生靶分叉血运重建,非POT组6例(10%)(p = 0.19)。在多变量分析中,POT是最强的参数,与BOCE、心脏死亡、任何血运重建的发生和全因死亡率相关。

结论

POT可改善临床结局。这些发现有力地支持了在接受ULM-PCI的患者中系统使用POT。

相似文献

1
Proximal optimization technique and percutaneous coronary intervention for left main disease: POTENTIAL-LM.近端优化技术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗左主干病变:POTENTIAL-LM研究
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 Feb;103(3):417-424. doi: 10.1002/ccd.30961. Epub 2024 Jan 31.
2
Long-term clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention for ostial/mid-shaft lesions versus distal bifurcation lesions in unprotected left main coronary artery: the DELTA Registry (drug-eluting stent for left main coronary artery disease): a multicenter registry evaluating percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting for left main treatment.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗开口/中段病变与无保护左主干冠状动脉分叉病变的长期临床结局:DELTA 注册研究(左主干冠状动脉疾病药物洗脱支架):一项多中心注册研究,评估经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗左主干的疗效。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Dec;6(12):1242-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.08.005.
3
Prognostic Effects of Treatment Strategies for Left Main Versus Non-Left Main Bifurcation Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Current-Generation Drug-Eluting Stent.当前代药物洗脱支架经皮冠状动脉介入治疗左主干与非左主干分叉病变的治疗策略的预后影响。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Feb;13(2):e008543. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.119.008543. Epub 2020 Feb 7.
4
Impact of 3-dimensional bifurcation angle on 5-year outcome of patients after percutaneous coronary intervention for left main coronary artery disease: a substudy of the SYNTAX trial (synergy between percutaneous coronary intervention with taxus and cardiac surgery).三维分叉角度对左主干冠状动脉疾病经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后 5 年预后的影响:SYNTAX 试验(紫杉醇药物洗脱支架与心脏搭桥术的联合治疗)的一项亚组研究。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Dec;6(12):1250-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.08.009.
5
[Comparison on the long-term outcomes post percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting for bifurcation lesions in unprotected left main coronary artery].[经皮冠状动脉介入治疗或冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗无保护左主干冠状动脉分叉病变的长期预后比较]
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2017 Jan 25;45(1):19-25. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3758.2017.01.005.
6
Impact of coronary anatomy and stenting technique on long-term outcome after drug-eluting stent implantation for unprotected left main coronary artery disease.药物洗脱支架置入治疗无保护左主干冠状动脉疾病后,冠状动脉解剖结构和支架技术对长期预后的影响。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Jan;7(1):29-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.08.013. Epub 2013 Dec 11.
7
Safety and efficacy of polymer-free biolimus-eluting stents versus ultrathin stents in unprotected left main or coronary bifurcation: A propensity score analysis from the RAIN and CHANCE registries.聚合物涂层雷帕霉素洗脱支架与超薄支架治疗无保护左主干或冠状动脉分叉病变的安全性和疗效:RAIN 和 CHANCE 注册研究的倾向评分分析。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Feb 15;95(3):522-529. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28413. Epub 2019 Aug 5.
8
Clinical outcome after crush versus culotte stenting of coronary artery bifurcation lesions: the Nordic Stent Technique Study 36-month follow-up results.经皮冠状动脉分叉病变挤压与 Culotte 支架置入术的临床结果:北欧支架技术研究 36 个月随访结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Nov;6(11):1160-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.06.009.
9
The anatomic- and clinical-based NERS (new risk stratification) score II to predict clinical outcomes after stenting unprotected left main coronary artery disease: results from a multicenter, prospective, registry study.基于解剖和临床的 NERS(新风险分层)评分 II 预测无保护左主干冠状动脉疾病支架置入后的临床结局:来自多中心、前瞻性登记研究的结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Dec;6(12):1233-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.08.006. Epub 2013 Nov 13.
10
Comparison of bioresorbable vs durable polymer drug-eluting stents in unprotected left main (from the RAIN-CARDIOGROUP VII Study).无保护左主干时生物可吸收 vs 持久聚合物药物洗脱支架比较(来自 RAIN-CARDIOGROUP VII 研究)。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2020 May 15;20(1):225. doi: 10.1186/s12872-020-01420-5.

引用本文的文献

1
OCT for Optimizing Long-Term Clinical Results in Left Main PCI-Dream or Reality? Results from a Single-Center High-Volume Registry.光学相干断层扫描用于优化左主干经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的长期临床结果——梦想还是现实?来自单中心高容量注册研究的结果
J Clin Med. 2025 Aug 18;14(16):5824. doi: 10.3390/jcm14165824.
2
Durable versus biodegradable polymer drug-eluting stents in all-comers.在所有患者中比较耐用型与可生物降解聚合物药物洗脱支架。
Open Heart. 2025 Mar 3;12(1):e003104. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2024-003104.
3
Contemporary Use of Post-Dilatation for Stent Optimization During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Results From the Netherlands Heart Registration.
经皮冠状动脉介入治疗期间后扩张用于优化支架的当代应用;来自荷兰心脏注册研究的结果
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2025 Mar;105(4):870-877. doi: 10.1002/ccd.31404. Epub 2025 Jan 8.
4
State-of-the-art percutaneous coronary intervention for left main coronary artery disease in Japan.日本左主干冠状动脉疾病的最新经皮冠状动脉介入治疗
Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2024 Oct;39(4):386-402. doi: 10.1007/s12928-024-01030-4. Epub 2024 Jul 30.