• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
PROphylactic closed incision Negative-PRESSure treatment in open incisional hernia repair: Protocol for a multicenter randomized trial (PROPRESS study).开放性切口疝修补术中预防性闭合切口负压治疗:一项多中心随机试验的方案(PROPRESS研究)
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2024 Jan 10;38:101256. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2024.101256. eCollection 2024 Apr.
2
Clinical Relevance of Closed-Incision Negative Pressure Therapy (ciNPT) for SSI-Risk Reduction in Vascular Surgery Through a Groin Incision.经腹股沟切口的闭合式切口负压治疗(ciNPT)在血管外科减少手术部位感染(SSI)风险的临床相关性。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2022 Jan;78:93-102. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2021.06.035. Epub 2021 Sep 16.
3
Closed Incision Negative Pressure Therapy Achieves Better Outcome Than Standard Wound Care: Clinical Outcome and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis in Open Ventral Hernia Repair With Synthetic Mesh Positioning.闭合切口负压治疗比标准伤口护理效果更佳:使用合成补片定位的开放性腹疝修补术的临床结果及成本效益分析
Cureus. 2020 May 26;12(5):e8283. doi: 10.7759/cureus.8283.
4
Closed Incision Negative Pressure Therapy to Reduce Surgical Site Infection in High-Risk Gastrointestinal Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.闭合切口负压疗法降低高危胃肠手术手术部位感染:一项随机对照试验
J Am Coll Surg. 2023 Apr 1;236(4):698-708. doi: 10.1097/XCS.0000000000000547. Epub 2023 Jan 10.
5
A multicenter, prospective randomized trial of negative pressure wound therapy for infrainguinal revascularization with a groin incision.一项多中心、前瞻性随机试验,研究负压伤口疗法在股部切口的下肢血运重建中的应用。
J Vasc Surg. 2021 Jul;74(1):257-267.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.12.100. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
6
Large abdominal hernia repair with closed incision negative pressure therapy: a case series.经闭合切口负压治疗的大型腹部疝修补术:病例系列研究。
J Wound Care. 2021 Mar 2;30(3):192-196. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2021.30.3.192.
7
Closed-incision negative-pressure therapy decreases complications in ventral hernia repair with concurrent panniculectomy.闭合式切口负压治疗降低了合并腹脂切除术的腹疝修补术的并发症。
Hernia. 2020 Feb;24(1):49-55. doi: 10.1007/s10029-018-1865-2. Epub 2018 Dec 17.
8
A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials for the reduction of surgical site infection in closed incision management versus standard of care dressings over closed vascular groin incisions.一项关于闭合性腹股沟血管切口闭合切口管理与标准护理敷料相比减少手术部位感染的随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Vascular. 2020 Jun;28(3):274-284. doi: 10.1177/1708538119890960. Epub 2020 Jan 19.
9
S116: Impact of incisional negative pressure wound therapy on surgical site infection after complex incisional hernia repair: a retrospective matched cohort study.S116:切口负压伤口治疗对复杂切口疝修补术后手术部位感染的影响:一项回顾性匹配队列研究。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Jul;35(7):3949-3960. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07857-1. Epub 2020 Aug 6.
10
Prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy for closed laparotomy incisions after ventral hernia repair: A systematic review and meta-analysis.预防性负压伤口疗法在腹外疝修补术后闭合式剖腹切口的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2022 Jan;97:106216. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.106216. Epub 2022 Jan 4.

引用本文的文献

1
A Systematic Review of Closed-Incision Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy for Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery: Updated Evidence, Context, and Clinical Implications.肝胰胆外科闭合切口负压伤口治疗的系统评价:更新的证据、背景及临床意义
J Clin Med. 2025 Jul 22;14(15):5191. doi: 10.3390/jcm14155191.

本文引用的文献

1
Prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy after open ventral hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis.开放式腹疝修补术后预防性负压伤口治疗:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Hernia. 2021 Dec;25(6):1481-1490. doi: 10.1007/s10029-021-02485-7. Epub 2021 Aug 14.
2
Causes of prolonged hospitalization after open incisional hernia repair: an observational single-center retrospective study of a prospective database.剖腹切口疝修补术后住院时间延长的原因:前瞻性数据库的观察性单中心回顾性研究。
Hernia. 2021 Aug;25(4):1027-1034. doi: 10.1007/s10029-020-02353-w. Epub 2021 Jan 5.
3
Prophylactic Single-use Negative Pressure Dressing in Closed Surgical Wounds After Incisional Hernia Repair: A Randomized, Controlled Trial.预防性单次使用负压伤口敷料在切口疝修补术后闭合性手术伤口中的应用:一项随机对照试验。
Ann Surg. 2021 Jun 1;273(6):1081-1086. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004310.
4
Laparoscopic versus open ventral hernia repair in the elderly: a propensity score-matched analysis.腹腔镜与开放手术治疗老年腹壁切口疝的对比:倾向评分匹配分析。
Hernia. 2021 Jun;25(3):673-677. doi: 10.1007/s10029-020-02243-1. Epub 2020 Jun 3.
5
Total cost of surgical site infection in the two years following primary knee replacement surgery.初次膝关节置换术后两年内手术部位感染的总成本。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2020 Aug;41(8):938-942. doi: 10.1017/ice.2020.198. Epub 2020 May 28.
6
Prophylactic Negative Pressure Wound Therapy for Closed Laparotomy Incisions: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.预防性负压伤口治疗在闭合式剖腹切口的应用:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Ann Surg. 2020 Jan;271(1):67-74. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003435.
7
Long-term impact of incisional hernia on quality of life after colonic cancer resection.结直肠癌切除术后切口疝对生活质量的长期影响。
Hernia. 2020 Apr;24(2):265-272. doi: 10.1007/s10029-019-01978-w. Epub 2019 May 24.
8
Negative Pressure Wound Therapy for Surgical-site Infections: A Randomized Trial.负压伤口疗法治疗手术部位感染:一项随机试验。
Ann Surg. 2019 Jun;269(6):1034-1040. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003056.
9
Negative pressure wound therapy for surgical wounds healing by primary closure.负压伤口治疗用于通过一期缝合愈合的手术伤口。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Mar 26;3(3):CD009261. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009261.pub4.
10
Surgical site infection: the "Achilles Heel" of all types of abdominal wall hernia reconstruction.手术部位感染:各类腹壁疝修补术的“阿喀琉斯之踵”。
Hernia. 2018 Dec;22(6):1003-1013. doi: 10.1007/s10029-018-1826-9. Epub 2018 Oct 1.

开放性切口疝修补术中预防性闭合切口负压治疗:一项多中心随机试验的方案(PROPRESS研究)

PROphylactic closed incision Negative-PRESSure treatment in open incisional hernia repair: Protocol for a multicenter randomized trial (PROPRESS study).

作者信息

Marckmann Mads, Henriksen Nadia A, Krarup Peter-Martin, Helgstrand Frederik, Vester-Glowinski Peter, Christoffersen Mette Willaume, Jensen Kristian Kiim

机构信息

Digestive Disease Center, Bispebjerg Hospital, Denmark.

Dept. of Gastrointestinal and Hepatic Diseases, Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark.

出版信息

Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2024 Jan 10;38:101256. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2024.101256. eCollection 2024 Apr.

DOI:10.1016/j.conctc.2024.101256
PMID:38298916
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10827677/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Negative Pressure Therapy in closed incisions (ciNPT) after surgery has shown positive effects including reduction of Surgical Site Infection (SSI) incidence. In patients undergoing elective open incisional hernia repair, however, ciNPT is not standard care, perhaps due to high-quality evidence still not provided. This study hypothesizes that this patient group would benefit from ciNPT by reducing wound complications and improving postoperative quality of life.

METHOD

This is a multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) including a total of 110 patients allocated in a 1:1 ratio with one intervention arm and one active control arm receiving ciNPT (i.e., Prevena™) and standard wound dressing, respectively. The primary outcome is the incidence of SSI at 30 days postoperatively and secondary outcomes are 1) pooled incidence of Surgical Site Occurrence (SSO), 2) patient-reported pain and satisfaction with the scar, and 3) hernia-related quality of life.

CONCLUSION

Patients undergoing elective open incisional hernia repair are fragile with a high risk of wound complication development. This multicenter RCT seeks to deliver the high-quality evidence needed to establish the role ciNPT must play for exactly this group with the aim of reducing SSI incidence and health economic costs, and finally improving quality of life. There are no theoretical or clinical experience of unwanted consequences of this treatment.

摘要

背景

手术后闭合切口负压治疗(ciNPT)已显示出积极效果,包括降低手术部位感染(SSI)发生率。然而,在接受择期开放性切口疝修补术的患者中,ciNPT并非标准治疗方法,这可能是因为尚未提供高质量证据。本研究假设该患者群体将从ciNPT中受益,可减少伤口并发症并改善术后生活质量。

方法

这是一项多中心随机对照试验(RCT),共纳入110例患者,按1:1比例分配,一个干预组和一个积极对照组分别接受ciNPT(即Prevena™)和标准伤口敷料。主要结局是术后30天的SSI发生率,次要结局包括:1)手术部位事件(SSO)的合并发生率;2)患者报告的疼痛及对瘢痕的满意度;3)与疝相关的生活质量。

结论

接受择期开放性切口疝修补术的患者较为脆弱,伤口并发症发生风险高。这项多中心RCT旨在提供高质量证据,以确定ciNPT对该特定患者群体的作用,目的是降低SSI发生率和卫生经济成本,最终改善生活质量。该治疗不存在不良后果的理论或临床经验。