Isaac Valeria, Lopez Vladimir, Escobar Maria Josefina
Center for Social and Cognitive Neuroscience, School of Psychology, Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez, Santiago, Chile.
School of Psychology, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Jan 17;14:1336040. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1336040. eCollection 2023.
Attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a heterogeneous neurodevelopmental condition, that continues to have an elusive etiological background. A number of extant models and theories have historically intended to explain the many factors contributing to ADHD behaviors. One of the most accepted hypotheses has been the executive dysfunction theory associating reduction in executive control to abnormalities in structure and operational dysfunction of dopaminergic signaling networks. Nevertheless, executive functions are not always impaired in ADHD, and the literature describes other symptoms commonly reported suggesting individuals with ADHD would appear to suffer from a more general deficit. Another existing line of research, that has gained much attention recently, establishes that ADHD would have dysregulated states of brain arousal that would account for its commonly observed cognitive deficits and behavioral symptoms, described as the state regulation theory, which has now included measures of autonomic function. This article describes some important aspects that compose and challenge these two most influential theoretical constructs, executive dysfunction and state-regulation, based on their empirical evidence, implying the need to reevaluate the norms used to classify individuals and establish ADHD diagnosis. Large number of controversial results continue to exist within the study of ADHD biological and/or performance markers, possibly due to such heterogeneity and variability within the same diagnosis. The need to resolve these issues and establish newly revised diagnostic criteria for ADHD is critical, as therapeutic success depends on having accurately identified underlying neurophysiological factors in order to appropriately address them in treatment.
注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)是一种异质性神经发育疾病,其病因背景仍然难以捉摸。历史上,许多现存的模型和理论都试图解释导致ADHD行为的诸多因素。其中最被广泛接受的假说之一是执行功能障碍理论,该理论将执行控制能力的下降与多巴胺能信号网络的结构异常和功能失调联系起来。然而,ADHD患者的执行功能并不总是受损,文献中描述的其他常见症状表明,ADHD患者似乎存在更普遍的缺陷。最近受到广泛关注的另一项现有研究表明,ADHD患者的大脑觉醒状态失调,这可以解释其常见的认知缺陷和行为症状,这就是所谓的状态调节理论,该理论现在已经纳入了自主神经功能的测量。本文基于实证证据,描述了构成并挑战这两种最具影响力的理论结构——执行功能障碍和状态调节——的一些重要方面,这意味着需要重新评估用于对个体进行分类和确立ADHD诊断的标准。在ADHD生物学和/或行为标记的研究中,大量有争议的结果仍然存在,这可能是由于同一诊断中的异质性和变异性所致。解决这些问题并为ADHD建立新修订的诊断标准至关重要,因为治疗的成功取决于准确识别潜在的神经生理因素,以便在治疗中适当地解决这些问题。