Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
J Hand Surg Asian Pac Vol. 2024 Feb;29(1):17-23. doi: 10.1142/S2424835524500036.
The primary objective of this study was to determine the association between preoperative electrodiagnostic study (EDS) parameters and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) instruments in patients with EDS-confirmed carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). A retrospective study of 45 patients with EDS-confirmed CTS was conducted. Patients completed the PROMIS Upper Extremity, PROMIS Pain Interference and PROMIS Pain Intensity. Explanatory variables included EDS disease severity (mild, moderate and severe), sensory peak latency, sensory amplitude, motor latency, motor amplitude, the presence of nonrecordable sensory latency and the presence of nonrecordable sensory amplitude. Explanatory variables also included patient-related factors, such as age, sex and diabetes mellitus. Associations between variables were assessed using simple linear regression, analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Student's -test. In our cohort, the EDS severity was mild in 38%, moderate in 42% and severe in 20% of patients. The mean PROMIS Upper Extremity score was 44.4, the mean PROMIS Pain Interference score was 53.5 and the mean PROMIS Pain Intensity score was 49.9. Bivariate analysis demonstrated no association between EDS severity overall or any EDS parameter individually and PROMIS Upper Extremity, PROMIS Pain Interference and PROMIS Pain Intensity. Diabetes mellitus was associated with poorer PROMIS Upper Extremity scores. EDS severity is not associated with PROMIS Upper Extremity, PROMIS Pain Interference and PROMIS Pain Intensity. Carpal tunnel release is commonly indicated for pain and dysfunction, but validated measures of pain and dysfunction do not correlate with EDS severity. Level III (Diagnostic).
本研究的主要目的是确定术前电诊断研究(EDS)参数与经确认腕管综合征(CTS)患者的患者报告结局测量信息系统(PROMIS)仪器之间的关联。对 45 例经 EDS 确诊的 CTS 患者进行了回顾性研究。患者完成了 PROMIS 上肢、PROMIS 疼痛干扰和 PROMIS 疼痛强度的测试。解释变量包括 EDS 疾病严重程度(轻度、中度和重度)、感觉峰潜伏期、感觉幅度、运动潜伏期、运动幅度、无记录感觉潜伏期的存在以及无记录感觉幅度的存在。解释变量还包括患者相关因素,如年龄、性别和糖尿病。使用简单线性回归、方差分析(ANOVA)和学生 t 检验评估变量之间的关联。在我们的队列中,EDS 严重程度轻度占 38%,中度占 42%,重度占 20%。PROMIS 上肢的平均评分是 44.4,PROMIS 疼痛干扰的平均评分是 53.5,PROMIS 疼痛强度的平均评分是 49.9。双变量分析表明,EDS 严重程度总体或任何 EDS 参数与 PROMIS 上肢、PROMIS 疼痛干扰和 PROMIS 疼痛强度之间均无关联。糖尿病与较差的 PROMIS 上肢评分相关。EDS 严重程度与 PROMIS 上肢、PROMIS 疼痛干扰和 PROMIS 疼痛强度无关。腕管松解术通常用于疼痛和功能障碍,但疼痛和功能障碍的验证性测量与 EDS 严重程度无关。III 级(诊断)。