Suppr超能文献

三线治疗中血管紧张素 II 与肾上腺素对感染性休克患者临床反应的比较:倾向评分匹配队列研究。

Clinical Response to Third-Line Angiotensin-II vs Epinephrine in Septic Shock: A Propensity-Matched Cohort Study.

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy Practice, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, MO, USA.

Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.

出版信息

Ann Pharmacother. 2024 Oct;58(10):1003-1012. doi: 10.1177/10600280231226132. Epub 2024 Feb 1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The appropriate third-line vasopressor in septic shock patients receiving norepinephrine and vasopressin is unknown. Angiotensin-II (AT-II) offers a unique mechanism of action to traditionally used vasopressors in septic shock.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of third-line AT-II to epinephrine in patients with septic shock.

METHODS

A single-center, retrospective cohort study of critically ill patients was performed between April 1, 2019 and July 31, 2022. Propensity-matched (2:1) analysis compared adults with septic shock who received third-line AT-II to controls who received epinephrine following norepinephrine and vasopressin. The primary outcome was clinical response 24 hours after third-line vasopressor initiation. Additional efficacy and safety outcomes were investigated.

RESULTS

Twenty-three AT-II patients were compared with 46 epinephrine patients. 47.8% of AT-II patients observed a clinical response at hour 24 compared with 28.3% of epinephrine patients ( = 0.12). In-hospital mortality (65.2% vs 73.9%, = 0.45), cardiac arrhythmias (26.1% vs 26.1%, = 0.21), and thromboembolism (4.3% vs 2.2%, = 0.61) were not observed to be statistically different between groups.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Administration of AT-II as a third-line vasopressor agent in septic shock patients was not associated with significantly improved clinical response at hour 24 compared with epinephrine. Although underpowered to detect meaningful differences, the clinical observations of this study warrant consideration and further investigation of AT-II as a third-line vasopressor in septic shock.

摘要

背景

在接受去甲肾上腺素和血管加压素的脓毒性休克患者中,合适的三线升压药尚不清楚。血管紧张素-II(AT-II)为脓毒性休克中传统使用的升压药提供了独特的作用机制。

目的

本研究的目的是比较三线 AT-II 与肾上腺素在脓毒性休克患者中的临床疗效和安全性。

方法

对 2019 年 4 月 1 日至 2022 年 7 月 31 日期间的危重症患者进行了单中心、回顾性队列研究。倾向评分匹配(2:1)分析比较了接受三线 AT-II 的脓毒性休克成人与接受去甲肾上腺素和血管加压素后接受肾上腺素的对照组。主要结局为三线血管加压药起始后 24 小时的临床反应。还研究了其他疗效和安全性结局。

结果

比较了 23 例 AT-II 患者和 46 例肾上腺素患者。接受 AT-II 的患者中有 47.8%在第 24 小时观察到临床反应,而接受肾上腺素的患者中有 28.3%( = 0.12)。院内死亡率(65.2%比 73.9%, = 0.45)、心律失常(26.1%比 26.1%, = 0.21)和血栓栓塞(4.3%比 2.2%, = 0.61)在两组之间未观察到统计学差异。

结论和相关性

与肾上腺素相比,AT-II 作为三线升压药在脓毒性休克患者中应用并未显著提高第 24 小时的临床反应。尽管本研究的效力不足以检测到有意义的差异,但临床观察结果值得考虑,并进一步研究 AT-II 作为脓毒性休克的三线升压药。

相似文献

3
Vasopressor therapy in critically ill patients with shock.血管加压素治疗休克危重症患者。
Intensive Care Med. 2019 Nov;45(11):1503-1517. doi: 10.1007/s00134-019-05801-z. Epub 2019 Oct 23.
8
Vasopressor Therapy in the Intensive Care Unit.重症监护病房中的血管加压药治疗
Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2021 Feb;42(1):59-77. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1710320. Epub 2020 Aug 20.
9
Effect of norepinephrine on the outcome of septic shock.去甲肾上腺素对感染性休克结局的影响。
Crit Care Med. 2000 Aug;28(8):2758-65. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200008000-00012.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验