Department of Stomatology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu, China.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Feb 2;103(5):e36469. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000036469.
To evaluate the feasibility of temporomandibular disorder (TMD) diagnosis with panoramic radiography, and provide standardized data for artificial intelligence-assisted diagnosis by measuring the differences in the condylar and mandibular ramus heights. A total of 500 panoramic radiographs (219 male and 281 female participants) of healthy individuals were examined. The panoramic machine compatible measurement software, SCANORA 5.2.6, was used to measure the bilateral condylar height and mandibular ramus height, and SPSS 27.0 was used to calculate the left- and right-side differences in condylar height and mandibular ramus height of healthy individuals. Magnetic resonance images of the temporomandibular joint region obtained from 46 outpatients in the Stomatology Department were selected along with their corresponding panoramic radiographs. The left- and right-sided differences were measured and compared with the magnetic resonance imaging results. The measurement data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (mm). t Tests were used to analyze data from healthy male and healthy female groups. The findings revealed that while there was no significant difference (P > .05) in the height of the condyle between men and women, there was a significant difference (P < .05) in the height of the mandibular ramus. In healthy population, the difference in height between the left and right condyle was 1.09 ± 0.99 mm. The difference in height of mandibular ramus in men was 1.26 ± 0.85 mm and that in women was 1.19 ± 0.87 mm. For the diagnosis of TMD, the sensitivity of panoramic radiographs was 94.74% (36/38), specificity was 75.00% (6/8), and diagnostic accuracy was 91.30% (42/46). The height of the right and left lateral condyles was not identical in healthy individuals, resulting in a discernible height discrepancy. In addition, the height of the mandibular ramus varied. By considering the left-right lateral height differences identified in this study along with clinical examination, it is possible to employ this metric as a preliminary screening tool for patients with TMD. Further, the use of panoramic radiographs for initial TMD screening is both viable and significant.
为了评估全景放射摄影术诊断颞下颌关节紊乱(TMD)的可行性,并通过测量髁突和下颌升支高度的差异为人工智能辅助诊断提供标准化数据。共检查了 500 名健康个体的全景片(219 名男性和 281 名女性)。使用与全景机兼容的测量软件 SCANORA 5.2.6 测量双侧髁突高度和下颌升支高度,使用 SPSS 27.0 计算健康个体髁突高度和下颌升支高度的左右侧差异。从口腔科的 46 名门诊患者中选择颞下颌关节区域的磁共振图像,并与相应的全景片一起测量左右侧差异,并与磁共振成像结果进行比较。测量数据表示为均值±标准差(mm)。使用 t 检验分析健康男性和健康女性组的数据。结果显示,男性和女性的髁突高度无显著差异(P>.05),但下颌升支高度有显著差异(P<.05)。在健康人群中,左右侧髁突高度差为 1.09±0.99 mm。男性下颌升支高度差为 1.26±0.85 mm,女性为 1.19±0.87 mm。对于 TMD 的诊断,全景片的灵敏度为 94.74%(36/38),特异性为 75.00%(6/8),诊断准确性为 91.30%(42/46)。健康个体的左右侧外侧髁突高度并不相同,导致明显的高度差异。此外,下颌升支高度也存在差异。考虑到本研究中确定的左右侧外侧高度差异以及临床检查,可以将该指标作为 TMD 患者的初步筛查工具。此外,使用全景片进行初始 TMD 筛查是可行且有意义的。