• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人减重手术费用呈下降趋势:47788 例减重患者的成本分析。

The downtrending cost of robotic bariatric surgery: a cost analysis of 47,788 bariatric patients.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, 2 Tampa General Circle, Rm 7015, Tampa, FL, 33606, USA.

Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.

出版信息

J Robot Surg. 2024 Feb 3;18(1):63. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01809-2.

DOI:10.1007/s11701-023-01809-2
PMID:38308699
Abstract

The surgical robot is assumed to be a fixed, indirect cost. We hypothesized rising volume of robotic bariatric procedures would decrease cost per patient over time. Patients who underwent elective, initial gastric bypass (GB) or sleeve gastrectomy (SG) for morbid obesity were selected from Florida Agency for Health Care Administration database from 2017 to 2021. Inflation-adjusted cost per patient was collected. Cost-over-time ($/patient year) and change in cost-over-time were calculated for open, laparoscopic, and robotic cases. Linear regression on cost generated predictive parameters. Density plots utilizing area under the curve demonstrated cost overlap. Among 76 hospitals, 11,472 bypasses (223 open, 6885 laparoscopic, 4364 robotic) and 36,316 sleeves (26,596 laparoscopic, 9724 robotic) were included. Total cost for robotic was approximately 1.5-fold higher (p < 0.001) than laparoscopic for both procedures. For GB, laparoscopic had lower total ($15,520) and operative ($6497) average cost compared to open (total $17,779; operative $9273) and robotic (total $21,756; operative $10,896). For SG, laparoscopic total cost was significantly less than robotic ($10,691 vs. $16,393). Robotic GB cost-over-time increased until 2021, when there was a large decrease in cost (-$944, compared with 2020). Robotic SG total cost-over time fluctuated, but decreased significantly in 2021 (-$490 compared with 2020). While surgical costs rose significantly in 2020 for bariatric procedures, our study suggests a possible downward trend in robotic bariatric surgery as total and operative costs are decreasing at a higher rate than laparoscopic costs.

摘要

手术机器人被视为一种固定的间接成本。我们假设随着机器人减重手术数量的增加,每位患者的成本将随着时间的推移而降低。从 2017 年到 2021 年,从佛罗里达州卫生保健管理局数据库中选择了因病态肥胖而接受择期初始胃旁路术(GB)或袖状胃切除术(SG)的患者。收集了每位患者的通胀调整后成本。计算了开放、腹腔镜和机器人手术的患者年度成本($/患者年)和年度成本变化。对成本进行线性回归以生成预测参数。利用曲线下面积的密度图显示了成本重叠。在 76 家医院中,共纳入 11472 例旁路术(223 例开放,6885 例腹腔镜,4364 例机器人)和 36316 例袖状胃切除术(26596 例腹腔镜,9724 例机器人)。对于两种手术,机器人的总费用(p<0.001)大约是腹腔镜的 1.5 倍。对于 GB,腹腔镜手术的总费用($15520)和手术费用($6497)低于开放手术(总费用$17779;手术费用$9273)和机器人手术(总费用$21756;手术费用$10896)。对于 SG,腹腔镜手术的总费用明显低于机器人手术($10691 比$16393)。GB 机器人手术的年度成本一直在增加,直到 2021 年成本大幅下降(与 2020 年相比下降了$944)。SG 机器人手术的年度总费用波动,但在 2021 年显著下降(与 2020 年相比下降了$490)。虽然 2020 年减重手术的手术费用显著增加,但我们的研究表明,机器人减重手术可能呈下降趋势,因为总手术费用和手术费用的下降速度高于腹腔镜手术费用。

相似文献

1
The downtrending cost of robotic bariatric surgery: a cost analysis of 47,788 bariatric patients.机器人减重手术费用呈下降趋势:47788 例减重患者的成本分析。
J Robot Surg. 2024 Feb 3;18(1):63. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01809-2.
2
Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy: a propensity score-matched comparative analysis using the 2015-2016 MBSAQIP database.机器人辅助与腹腔镜 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术和袖状胃切除术:使用 2015-2016 MBSAQIP 数据库进行倾向评分匹配的比较分析。
Surg Endosc. 2019 May;33(5):1600-1612. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6422-7. Epub 2018 Sep 17.
3
Outcomes in conventional laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted revisional bariatric surgery: a retrospective, case-controlled study of the MBSAQIP database.传统腹腔镜与机器人辅助减重手术翻修术的疗效:一项对MBSAQIP数据库的回顾性病例对照研究。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Apr;34(4):1573-1584. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06917-5. Epub 2019 Jun 17.
4
Robotic sleeve gastrectomy has higher complication rates compared to laparoscopic: 8-year analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic primary bariatric surgery.与腹腔镜手术相比,机器人袖状胃切除术并发症发生率更高:机器人与腹腔镜初次减肥手术的8年分析。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2025 Apr;21(4):372-381. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2024.11.014. Epub 2024 Dec 5.
5
Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic approach to concurrent bariatric surgery and hiatal hernia repair: propensity score matching analysis using the 2015-2018 MBSAQIP.机器人辅助与腹腔镜联合减重手术和食管裂孔疝修补术:使用 2015-2018 年 MBSAQIP 的倾向评分匹配分析。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Sep;36(9):6886-6895. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09027-x. Epub 2022 Jan 12.
6
Direct medical costs of robotic sleeve gastrectomy compared to laparoscopic approach in a single academic center.单中心研究:机器人袖状胃切除术与腹腔镜手术相比的直接医疗成本。
J Robot Surg. 2023 Feb;17(1):49-54. doi: 10.1007/s11701-022-01385-x. Epub 2022 Mar 19.
7
Robotic-Assisted and Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgeries Still Have Clinically Comparable Outcomes.机器人辅助腹腔镜减重手术仍具有临床可比性结果。
Obes Surg. 2024 Aug;34(8):2954-2964. doi: 10.1007/s11695-024-07368-1. Epub 2024 Jul 18.
8
Robotic Bariatric Surgery in Older Adults, Is It Safer Than the Laparoscopic Approach? A 7-Year Analysis of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) Database.机器人减重手术在老年人中的应用:与腹腔镜方法相比更安全吗?对代谢和减重手术认证和质量改进计划(MBSAQIP)数据库的 7 年分析。
Obes Surg. 2023 Sep;33(9):2671-2678. doi: 10.1007/s11695-023-06720-1. Epub 2023 Jul 11.
9
Perioperative Outcomes of Laparoscopic and Robotic Revisional Bariatric Surgery in a Complex Patient Population.腹腔镜和机器人减重手术在复杂患者人群中的围手术期结果。
Obes Surg. 2018 Jul;28(7):1852-1859. doi: 10.1007/s11695-018-3119-x.
10
Robotic bariatric surgery reduces morbidity for revisional gastric bypass when compared to laparoscopic: outcome of 8-year MBSAQIP analysis of over 40,000 cases.机器人减重手术与腹腔镜手术相比,减少了再手术胃旁路术的发病率:超过 40000 例 MBSAQIP 分析 8 年的结果。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Nov;38(11):6294-6304. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11192-0. Epub 2024 Aug 23.

引用本文的文献

1
More procedures, more efficiency: optimizing operating room during the phase of learning curve-experience of first 100 robotic bariatric procedures in a single center.更多手术,更高效率:单中心前100例机器人减重手术学习曲线阶段手术室的优化经验
J Robot Surg. 2025 May 24;19(1):233. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02396-0.
2
Costs of robotic and laparoscopic bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.机器人辅助与腹腔镜减重手术的成本:系统评价与荟萃分析
Surg Endosc. 2025 May;39(5):2784-2798. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11744-y. Epub 2025 Apr 21.
3
Robotic bariatric surgery: the Italian point of view to go beyond.

本文引用的文献

1
Robotic-Assisted Versus Laparoscopic Revisional Bariatric Surgery: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis on Perioperative Outcomes.机器人辅助与腹腔镜减重修复手术:围手术期结局的系统评价和荟萃分析
Obes Surg. 2021 Nov;31(11):5022-5033. doi: 10.1007/s11695-021-05668-4. Epub 2021 Aug 19.
2
Comparative perioperative and 5-year outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic or open inguinal hernia repair: a study of 153,727 patients in the state of New York.纽约州 153727 例患者的机器人与腹腔镜或开放式腹股沟疝修补术的围手术期和 5 年结果比较研究。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Dec;35(12):7209-7218. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-08211-1. Epub 2021 Jan 4.
3
机器人减肥手术:超越现状的意大利视角。
Updates Surg. 2025 Apr 2. doi: 10.1007/s13304-025-02146-9.
Trends in Utilization and Perioperative Outcomes in Robotic-assisted Bariatric surgery using the MBSAQIP database: A 4-Year Analysis.
利用 MBSAQIP 数据库分析 4 年来机器人辅助减重手术的利用趋势和围手术期结果。
Obes Surg. 2021 Feb;31(2):854-861. doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-05055-5. Epub 2020 Nov 9.
4
The Impact of Telemedicine Adoption on a Multidisciplinary Bariatric Surgery Practice During the COVID-19 Pandemic.新冠疫情期间远程医疗的采用对多学科减肥手术实践的影响
Ann Surg. 2020 Dec;272(6):e306-e310. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004391.
5
Elective robotic-assisted bariatric surgery: Is it worth the money? A national database analysis.择期机器人辅助减重手术:它物有所值吗?一项全国数据库分析。
Am J Surg. 2020 Dec;220(6):1445-1450. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.08.040. Epub 2020 Aug 31.
6
Trends in the utilization and perioperative outcomes of primary robotic bariatric surgery from 2015 to 2018: a study of 46,764 patients from the MBSAQIP data registry.2015 年至 2018 年原发性机器人减重手术利用和围手术期结果的趋势:来自 MBSAQIP 数据登记处的 46764 例患者的研究。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Jul;35(7):3915-3922. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07839-3. Epub 2020 Jul 31.
7
Robotic Inguinal vs Transabdominal Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair: The RIVAL Randomized Clinical Trial.机器人腹股沟与经腹腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术:RIVAL 随机临床试验。
JAMA Surg. 2020 May 1;155(5):380-387. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.0034.
8
Outcomes in conventional laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted primary bariatric surgery: a retrospective, case-controlled study of the MBSAQIP database.常规腹腔镜与机器人辅助原发性减重手术的结果:MBSAQIP 数据库的回顾性、病例对照研究。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Mar;34(3):1353-1365. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06915-7. Epub 2019 Jun 17.
9
Comparison of robotic revisional weight loss surgery and laparoscopic revisional weight loss surgery using the MBSAQIP database.利用 MBSAQIP 数据库比较机器人减重手术与腹腔镜减重手术。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2019 Jun;15(6):909-919. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2019.03.022. Epub 2019 Mar 22.
10
Subxiphoid or subcostal uniportal robotic-assisted surgery: early experimental experience.剑突下或肋缘下单孔机器人辅助手术:早期实验经验
J Thorac Dis. 2019 Jan;11(1):231-239. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.12.94.