School of Psychology and Sport Science, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Centre for Psychological Medicine, Perdana University, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Department of Management, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom; Huma Therapeutics Ltd, London, United Kingdom; Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Biol Psychol. 2024 Feb;186:108761. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2024.108761. Epub 2024 Feb 2.
Previous research suggests that the processing of internal body sensations (interoception) affects how we experience pain. Some evidence suggests that people with fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) - a condition characterised by chronic pain and fatigue - may have altered interoceptive processing. However, extant findings are inconclusive, and some tasks previously used to measure interoception are of questionable validity. Here, we used an alternative measure - the Phase Adjustment Task (PAT) - to examine cardiac interoceptive accuracy in adults with FMS. We examined: (i) the tolerability of the PAT in an FMS sample (N = 154); (ii) if there are differences in facets of interoception (PAT performance, PAT-related confidence, and scores on the Private Body Consciousness Scale) between an FMS sample and an age- and gender-matched pain-free sample (N = 94); and (iii) if subgroups of participants with FMS are identifiable according to interoceptive accuracy levels. We found the PAT was tolerable in the FMS sample, with additional task breaks and a recommended hand posture. The FMS sample were more likely to be classified as 'interoceptive' on the PAT, and had significantly higher self-reported interoception compared to the pain-free sample. Within the FMS sample, we identified a subgroup who demonstrated very strong evidence of being interoceptive, and concurrently had lower fibromyalgia symptom impact (although the effect size was small). Conversely, self-reported interoception was positively correlated with FMS symptom severity and impact. Overall, interoception may be an important factor to consider in understanding and managing FMS symptoms. We recommend future longitudinal work to better understand associations between fluctuating FMS symptoms and interoception.
先前的研究表明,内部身体感觉(内感受)的处理方式会影响我们对疼痛的体验。有证据表明,纤维肌痛综合征(FMS)患者——一种以慢性疼痛和疲劳为特征的疾病——可能存在内感受处理的改变。然而,现有的研究结果并不一致,并且一些以前用于测量内感受的任务的有效性值得怀疑。在这里,我们使用替代测量方法——相位调整任务(PAT)——来检查 FMS 成人的心脏内感受准确性。我们检查了:(i)在 FMS 样本中(N=154)PAT 的耐受性;(ii)在 FMS 样本和年龄和性别匹配的无痛样本(N=94)之间,内感受的各个方面(PAT 表现、与 PAT 相关的信心和私人身体意识量表的分数)是否存在差异;(iii)是否可以根据参与者的内感受准确性水平来识别 FMS 亚组。我们发现,在 FMS 样本中,PAT 是可以忍受的,并且可以增加额外的任务休息和推荐的手部姿势。FMS 样本在 PAT 上被归类为“内感受”的可能性更高,并且自我报告的内感受明显高于无痛样本。在 FMS 样本中,我们确定了一个亚组,他们表现出非常强烈的内感受证据,同时具有较低的纤维肌痛症状影响(尽管效果大小较小)。相反,自我报告的内感受与 FMS 症状严重程度和影响呈正相关。总体而言,内感受可能是理解和管理 FMS 症状的一个重要因素。我们建议未来进行纵向研究,以更好地理解 FMS 症状的波动与内感受之间的关联。