• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“台上”与“台下”直接前路全髋关节置换术:有差异吗?

'On Table' Versus 'Off Table' Direct Anterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty: Is There a Difference?

作者信息

Narayanan Arvind S, Densley Sebastian M, McCauley Julie C, Kulidjian Anna A, Bugbee William D, Wilde Jeffrey M

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Scripps Clinic, La Jolla, CA, USA.

Shiley Center for Orthopaedic Research and Education, Scripps Clinic, La Jolla, CA, USA.

出版信息

Arthroplast Today. 2024 Jan 23;25:101283. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2023.101283. eCollection 2024 Feb.

DOI:10.1016/j.artd.2023.101283
PMID:38313192
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10834458/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether there were differences in patient-reported outcomes, operative times, satisfaction scores, and complications between patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) performed through a direct anterior approach on a specialized traction table or a regular operating room table.

METHODS

Patients who underwent a direct anterior approach THA on a specialized table or a regular table with a minimum 1-year follow-up were included. Patient-reported outcome measures and THA satisfaction were recorded. Demographics, complications, and operative times (both in-room and surgical time) were evaluated. Three hundred twenty-two patients were included with 217 (67.4%) undergoing anterior THA on the specialized table and 105 (32.6%) on a regular table.

RESULTS

Outcome measures were similar at 4 months and 1 year postoperatively. Average operative time was 87 minutes (range, 50-160) and 90 minutes (range, 35-197) for the specialized table and regular table groups ( = .314). Average total in room time was 123 minutes (range, 87-201) and 120 minutes (range, 62-255) for the specialized table and regular table groups ( = .564). Satisfaction rates between groups did not differ ( = .564). No differences were found in complication rates at 4 months ( = .814) or 1 year ( = .547).

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that the direct anterior approach for THA can be safely and efficiently performed on either a specialized traction table or a regular table. Surgeons should continue to utilize the approach and set-up they are most comfortable with to achieve an optimal outcome for the patient.

摘要

背景

本研究的目的是评估在专门的牵引台上或常规手术台上通过直接前路进行全髋关节置换术(THA)的患者在患者报告的结局、手术时间、满意度评分和并发症方面是否存在差异。

方法

纳入在专门手术台或常规手术台上接受直接前路THA且至少随访1年的患者。记录患者报告的结局指标和THA满意度。评估人口统计学、并发症和手术时间(包括在手术室的时间和手术时间)。共纳入322例患者,其中217例(67.4%)在专门手术台上接受前路THA,105例(32.6%)在常规手术台上接受。

结果

术后4个月和1年时结局指标相似。专门手术台组和常规手术台组的平均手术时间分别为87分钟(范围50 - 160分钟)和90分钟(范围35 - 197分钟)(P = 0.314)。专门手术台组和常规手术台组的平均总手术室时间分别为123分钟(范围87 - 201分钟)和120分钟(范围62 - 255分钟)(P = 0.564)。两组间的满意度率无差异(P = 0.564)。4个月时(P = 0.814)或1年时(P = 0.547)的并发症发生率无差异。

结论

本研究表明,THA的直接前路手术在专门的牵引台或常规手术台上均可安全、有效地进行。外科医生应继续采用他们最熟悉的方法和设置,以实现患者的最佳治疗效果。

相似文献

1
'On Table' Versus 'Off Table' Direct Anterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty: Is There a Difference?“台上”与“台下”直接前路全髋关节置换术:有差异吗?
Arthroplast Today. 2024 Jan 23;25:101283. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2023.101283. eCollection 2024 Feb.
2
Does Surgical Approach Affect Patient-reported Function After Primary THA?初次全髋关节置换术后手术入路会影响患者报告的功能吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Apr;474(4):971-81. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4639-5. Epub 2015 Nov 30.
3
Traction table versus standard table total hip arthroplasty through the direct anterior approach: a systematic review.直接前入路中牵引床与标准手术台行全髋关节置换术的比较:系统评价。
Hip Int. 2020 Nov;30(6):662-672. doi: 10.1177/1120700019900987. Epub 2020 Jan 29.
4
Total hip arthroplasty through the direct anterior approach with and without the use of a traction table: a matched-control, retrospective, single-surgeon study.直接前入路行全髋关节置换术:应用与不应用牵引床的配对对照、回顾性、单医师研究。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2021 Jan 11;16(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-02184-6.
5
The Direct Anterior Approach for Complex Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: The Extensile Acetabular Approach on a Regular Operating Room Table.复杂初次全髋关节置换术的直接前入路:在常规手术台上的髋臼扩大入路
J Arthroplasty. 2017 May;32(5):1553-1559. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.12.016. Epub 2016 Dec 22.
6
Use of traction table did not increase complications in total hip arthroplasty through direct anterior approach performed by novice surgeon.使用牵引台并不会增加由新手医生通过直接前入路行全髋关节置换术的并发症。
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2020 Jan-Apr;28(2):2309499020923093. doi: 10.1177/2309499020923093.
7
Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes after Direct Anterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Two Specialized Surgical Tables.使用两张专用手术台行直接前路全髋关节置换术后的临床及影像学结果
Arthroplast Today. 2020 Jul 24;6(3):538-542. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2020.06.011. eCollection 2020 Sep.
8
Leg length discrepancy after total hip arthroplasty: Can leg length be satisfactorily controlled via anterior approach without a traction table? Evaluation in 56 patients with EOS 3D.全髋关节置换术后下肢长度差异:通过前方入路不使用牵引床是否可以满意地控制下肢长度?EOS 3D 评估 56 例患者。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2018 Dec;104(8):1143-1148. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2018.06.020. Epub 2018 Oct 10.
9
The Off-Table Technique Increases Operating Room Efficiency in Direct Anterior Hip Replacement.体外技术提高了直接前路髋关节置换术的手术室效率。
Arthroplast Today. 2022 May 18;15:167-173. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2022.03.026. eCollection 2022 Jun.
10
Pelvic position, lying on a traction table, during THA by direct anterior approach. Comparison with the standing position and influence on the acetabular cup anteversion.前路直接入路行全髋关节置换术时采用骨盆悬吊位、牵引床上仰卧位与站立位的比较及对髋臼杯前倾角的影响。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2021 Dec;107(8):103077. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2021.103077. Epub 2021 Sep 24.

本文引用的文献

1
The Off-Table Technique Increases Operating Room Efficiency in Direct Anterior Hip Replacement.体外技术提高了直接前路髋关节置换术的手术室效率。
Arthroplast Today. 2022 May 18;15:167-173. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2022.03.026. eCollection 2022 Jun.
2
POSTERIOR VERSUS ANTERIOR APPROACH TO TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS OF RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS.全髋关节置换术的后路与前路入路:随机对照试验的系统评价与荟萃分析
Acta Ortop Bras. 2021 Nov-Dec;29(6):297-303. doi: 10.1590/1413-785220212906244610.
3
No Difference in Functional, Radiographic, and Survivorship Outcomes Between Direct Anterior or Posterior Approach THA: 5-Year Results of a Randomized Trial.直接前侧或后侧入路行全髋关节置换术的功能、影像学和生存结果无差异:一项随机试验的 5 年结果。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2021 Dec 1;479(12):2621-2629. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001855.
4
Measurement properties of PROMIS short forms for pain and function in total hip arthroplasty patients.全髋关节置换术患者疼痛与功能的PROMIS简表测量属性
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2021 May 30;5(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s41687-021-00313-1.
5
Total hip arthroplasty through the direct anterior approach with and without the use of a traction table: a matched-control, retrospective, single-surgeon study.直接前入路行全髋关节置换术:应用与不应用牵引床的配对对照、回顾性、单医师研究。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2021 Jan 11;16(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-02184-6.
6
Direct anterior versus posterior approach for total hip arthroplasty: a multicentre, prospective, randomized clinical trial.直接前方入路与后外侧入路行全髋关节置换术的比较:一项多中心前瞻性随机临床试验。
Can J Surg. 2020 Sep-Oct;63(5):E412-E417. doi: 10.1503/cjs.012019.
7
Traction table versus standard table total hip arthroplasty through the direct anterior approach: a systematic review.直接前入路中牵引床与标准手术台行全髋关节置换术的比较:系统评价。
Hip Int. 2020 Nov;30(6):662-672. doi: 10.1177/1120700019900987. Epub 2020 Jan 29.
8
Effect of hospital volume on outcomes of total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.医院手术量对全髋关节置换术结局的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2019 Dec 27;14(1):468. doi: 10.1186/s13018-019-1531-0.
9
Prospective, Randomized Study of Direct Anterior Approach vs Posterolateral Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Concise 5-Year Follow-Up Evaluation.直接前入路与后外侧入路全髋关节置换术的前瞻性随机研究:简短的 5 年随访评估。
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Jun;34(6):1139-1142. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.01.060. Epub 2019 Feb 16.
10
Reliability of Modified Harris Hip Score as a tool for outcome evaluation of Total Hip Replacements in Indian population.改良Harris髋关节评分作为印度人群全髋关节置换术疗效评估工具的可靠性。
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2019 Jan-Feb;10(1):128-130. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2017.11.019. Epub 2017 Dec 6.