Johnson D W, Johnson R T, Roy P, Zaidman B
J Psychol. 1985 Jul;119(4):303-21. doi: 10.1080/00223980.1985.9915450.
Oral interaction within cooperative learning groups was observed for high-, medium-, and low-achieving students. Initially, cooperative and individualistic learning situations were compared on achievement and attitudes. Forty-eight 4th-grade American students were assigned to learning situations on a stratified random basis controlling for ability and sex. They participated in the study for 55 min a day for 15 instructional days. Two observation schemes were used. The results for the cooperative situation were factor analyzed to determine the basic dimensions of oral interaction within cooperative learning groups. Five orthogonal factors were identified: Exchanging Task-Related Information, Elaborating on the Information, Encouraging Each Other to Learn, Disagreeing With Each Other's Conclusions, and Making Nontask Comments and Sharing Personal Feelings. The oral participation of students from different achievement levels was differentially related to achievement. Vocalizing was found to be more strongly related to achievement than was listening to other group members vocalize. Medium and low achievers especially benefited from cooperative learning experiences.
研究观察了高成就、中等成就和低成就学生在合作学习小组中的口头互动情况。最初,对合作学习情境和个人主义学习情境在成绩和态度方面进行了比较。48名四年级美国学生按分层随机的方式被分配到不同的学习情境中,同时控制了能力和性别因素。他们每天参与研究55分钟,共进行15个教学日。研究使用了两种观察方案。对合作学习情境的结果进行了因素分析,以确定合作学习小组中口头互动的基本维度。确定了五个正交因素:交流与任务相关的信息、详细阐述信息、互相鼓励学习、对彼此的结论提出异议、发表与任务无关的评论并分享个人感受。不同成绩水平的学生的口头参与与成绩存在不同程度的关联。发现发声比倾听其他小组成员发声与成绩的相关性更强。中等成就和低成就的学生尤其从合作学习经历中受益。