Chien Jessie Chih-Yuan, Eich Teal S
The Leonard Davis School of Gerontology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Front Psychol. 2024 Jan 19;14:1296662. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1296662. eCollection 2023.
The Directed Forgetting paradigm has proven to be a powerful tool to explore motivated forgetting in the lab. Past work has shown that older adults are less able to intentionally suppress information from memory relative to younger adults, which is often attributed to deficits in inhibitory abilities. Instructions in traditional Directed Forgetting tasks contain terms that may elicit stereotype threat in older adults, which may negatively impact memory. Here, we tested whether the instructions in a Directed Forgetting task affected older adults' ability to appropriately control the contents of memory.
In two experiments that differed in the number of words presented (30 vs. 48 items), younger and older adults were randomized into one of four crossed Conditions of a Directed Forgetting task. At encoding, participants were either instructed to remember/ forget items, or to think about/not think about items. At test, they were either asked whether the memory probe was old or new, or whether they had seen it before (yes/no). Each experiment contained data from 100 younger (18- 40 years) and 98 older (60+ years) adults, with ~25 participants per Condition. All participants were recruited from Prolific and tested online.
In neither Experiment 1 nor Experiment 2 did we find evidence of a stereotype threat effect, or age-related effects of directed forgetting. We did find that performance for to-be-forgotten items was worse in conditions with encoding instructions that contained words that might trigger stereotype threat relative to conditions that did not contain such words: when explicitly told to forget items, both older and younger adults forgot more items than did participants who were cued to not think about the words and put them out of mind. However, we found no such difference across the two different remember instructions: regardless of whether participants were told to remember or to think about items, recognition memory for to be retained items was high. The pattern of results across the two experiments was similar, except, not surprisingly, participants performed worse in Experiment 2 than Experiment 1. Interestingly, we found that higher accuracy for to be remembered items was associated with a more positive outlook of one's own memory relative to others.
These results suggest that directed forgetting may not always be impaired in older adults.
定向遗忘范式已被证明是在实验室中探索动机性遗忘的有力工具。过去的研究表明,与年轻人相比,老年人更难以有意地抑制记忆中的信息,这通常归因于抑制能力的缺陷。传统定向遗忘任务中的指令包含一些可能引发老年人刻板印象威胁的词汇,这可能会对记忆产生负面影响。在这里,我们测试了定向遗忘任务中的指令是否会影响老年人适当控制记忆内容的能力。
在两个呈现单词数量不同(30个与48个项目)的实验中,年轻人和老年人被随机分配到定向遗忘任务的四个交叉条件之一。在编码阶段,参与者要么被指示记住/忘记项目,要么被指示思考/不思考项目。在测试阶段,他们要么被问及记忆探针是旧的还是新的,要么被问及他们之前是否见过它(是/否)。每个实验包含来自100名年轻人(18 - 40岁)和98名老年人(60岁以上)的数据,每个条件约有25名参与者。所有参与者均从Prolific招募并进行在线测试。
在实验1和实验2中,我们均未发现刻板印象威胁效应或定向遗忘的年龄相关效应的证据。我们确实发现,与不包含可能引发刻板印象威胁词汇的编码指令条件相比,包含此类词汇的编码指令条件下,待遗忘项目的表现更差:当明确被告知忘记项目时,老年人和年轻人忘记的项目都比被提示不思考这些单词并将其抛诸脑后的参与者更多。然而,我们发现在两种不同的记住指令下没有这种差异:无论参与者是被告知记住还是思考项目,对要保留项目的识别记忆都很高。两个实验的结果模式相似,不出所料的是,实验2中的参与者表现比实验1更差。有趣的是,我们发现,相对于他人,对要记住项目的更高准确性与对自己记忆的更积极看法相关。
这些结果表明,老年人的定向遗忘可能并不总是受损。