Suppr超能文献

使用功能神经影像学对句子理解过程进行分段困难。

Fractionating difficulty during sentence comprehension using functional neuroimaging.

机构信息

Department of Speech, Language and Hearing Sciences, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, United States.

Radboud University, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition, and Behaviour, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Cereb Cortex. 2024 Jan 31;34(2). doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhae032.

Abstract

Sentence comprehension is highly practiced and largely automatic, but this belies the complexity of the underlying processes. We used functional neuroimaging to investigate garden-path sentences that cause difficulty during comprehension, in order to unpack the different processes used to support sentence interpretation. By investigating garden-path and other types of sentences within the same individuals, we functionally profiled different regions within the temporal and frontal cortices in the left hemisphere. The results revealed that different aspects of comprehension difficulty are handled by left posterior temporal, left anterior temporal, ventral left frontal, and dorsal left frontal cortices. The functional profiles of these regions likely lie along a spectrum of specificity to generality, including language-specific processing of linguistic representations, more general conflict resolution processes operating over linguistic representations, and processes for handling difficulty in general. These findings suggest that difficulty is not unitary and that there is a role for a variety of linguistic and non-linguistic processes in supporting comprehension.

摘要

句子理解是高度训练和高度自动化的,但这掩盖了潜在过程的复杂性。我们使用功能神经影像学来研究在理解过程中引起困难的花园路径句子,以分解用于支持句子解释的不同过程。通过在同一个体中研究花园路径和其他类型的句子,我们在左半球的颞叶和额叶的不同区域进行了功能分析。结果表明,不同方面的理解难度由左后颞叶、左前颞叶、腹侧左额叶和背侧左额叶处理。这些区域的功能特征可能沿着特异性到一般性的范围,包括语言特异性的语言表示处理、在语言表示上操作的更一般的冲突解决过程,以及用于处理一般难度的过程。这些发现表明困难不是单一的,并且在支持理解方面,各种语言和非语言过程都有作用。

相似文献

1
Fractionating difficulty during sentence comprehension using functional neuroimaging.
Cereb Cortex. 2024 Jan 31;34(2). doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhae032.
2
The role of left temporo-parietal and inferior frontal cortex in comprehending syntactically complex sentences: A brain stimulation study.
Neuropsychologia. 2023 Feb 10;180:108465. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2022.108465. Epub 2022 Dec 28.
3
Is sentence ambiguity comprehension affected after mild traumatic brain injury? Results suggest cognitive control is more important than diagnosis.
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2022 Sep;57(5):990-1005. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12734. Epub 2022 May 25.
4
Combined eye tracking and fMRI reveals neural basis of linguistic predictions during sentence comprehension.
Cortex. 2015 Jul;68:33-47. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2015.04.011. Epub 2015 Apr 27.
5
Mapping sentence comprehension and syntactic complexity: evidence from 131 stroke survivors.
Brain Commun. 2024 Nov 15;6(6):fcae379. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcae379. eCollection 2024.
6
Common and distinct neural substrates of sentence production and comprehension.
Neuroimage. 2021 Jan 1;224:117374. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117374. Epub 2020 Sep 17.
7
How right hemisphere damage after stroke can impair speech comprehension.
Brain. 2018 Dec 1;141(12):3389-3404. doi: 10.1093/brain/awy270.
8
9
Conflict control during sentence comprehension: fMRI evidence.
Neuroimage. 2009 Oct 15;48(1):280-90. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.06.032. Epub 2009 Jun 21.
10
Intonation guides sentence processing in the left inferior frontal gyrus.
Cortex. 2019 Aug;117:122-134. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2019.02.011. Epub 2019 Feb 27.

本文引用的文献

1
Neural Mechanisms Underlying the Dynamic Updating of Native Language.
Neurobiol Lang (Camb). 2020 Nov 1;1(4):492-522. doi: 10.1162/nol_a_00023. eCollection 2020.
2
Probabilistic atlas for the language network based on precision fMRI data from >800 individuals.
Sci Data. 2022 Aug 29;9(1):529. doi: 10.1038/s41597-022-01645-3.
3
Robust Effects of Working Memory Demand during Naturalistic Language Comprehension in Language-Selective Cortex.
J Neurosci. 2022 Sep 28;42(39):7412-7430. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1894-21.2022.
4
Semantic Working Memory Predicts Sentence Comprehension Performance: A Case Series Approach.
Front Psychol. 2022 Apr 29;13:887586. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.887586. eCollection 2022.
5
Agrammatism and Paragrammatism: A Cortical Double Dissociation Revealed by Lesion-Symptom Mapping.
Neurobiol Lang (Camb). 2020;1(2):208-225. doi: 10.1162/nol_a_00010. Epub 2020 Jun 1.
6
The Domain-General Multiple Demand (MD) Network Does Not Support Core Aspects of Language Comprehension: A Large-Scale fMRI Investigation.
J Neurosci. 2020 Jun 3;40(23):4536-4550. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2036-19.2020. Epub 2020 Apr 21.
7
Neural networks for sentence comprehension and production: An ALE-based meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies.
Hum Brain Mapp. 2019 Jun 1;40(8):2275-2304. doi: 10.1002/hbm.24523. Epub 2019 Jan 28.
8
Who did what? A causal role for cognitive control in thematic role assignment during sentence comprehension.
Cognition. 2018 Sep;178:162-177. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.05.014. Epub 2018 May 31.
9
Some inferences still take time: Prosody, predictability, and the speed of scalar implicatures.
Cogn Psychol. 2018 May;102:105-126. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2018.01.004. Epub 2018 Mar 6.
10
Anatomy of aphasia revisited.
Brain. 2018 Mar 1;141(3):848-862. doi: 10.1093/brain/awx363.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验