Bonhage Corinna E, Mueller Jutta L, Friederici Angela D, Fiebach Christian J
Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany; Osnabrueck University, Institute of Cognitive Science, Osnabrueck, Germany.
Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany; Osnabrueck University, Institute of Cognitive Science, Osnabrueck, Germany.
Cortex. 2015 Jul;68:33-47. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2015.04.011. Epub 2015 Apr 27.
It is widely agreed upon that linguistic predictions are an integral part of language comprehension. Yet, experimental proof of their existence remains challenging. Here, we introduce a new predictive eye gaze reading task combining eye tracking and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) that allows us to infer the existence and timing of linguistic predictions via anticipatory eye-movements. Participants read different types of word sequences (i.e., regular sentences, meaningless jabberwocky sentences, non-word lists) up to the pre-final word. The final target word was displayed with a temporal delay and its screen position was dependent on the syntactic word category (nouns vs verbs). During the delay, anticipatory eye-movements into the correct target word area were indicative of linguistic predictions. For fMRI analysis, the predictive sentence conditions were contrasted to the non-word condition, with the anticipatory eye-movements specifying differences in timing across conditions. A conjunction analysis of both sentence conditions revealed the neural substrate of word category prediction, namely a distributed network of cortical and subcortical brain regions including language systems, basal ganglia, thalamus, and hippocampus. Direct contrasts between the regular sentence condition and the jabberwocky condition indicate that prediction of word category in meaningless jabberwocky sentences relies on classical left-hemispheric language systems involving Brodman's area 44/45 in the left inferior frontal gyrus, left superior temporal areas, and the dorsal caudate nucleus. Regular sentences, in contrast, allowed for the prediction of specific words. Word-specific predictions were specifically associated with more widely distributed temporal and parietal cortical systems, most prominently in the right hemisphere. Our results support the presence of linguistic predictions during sentence processing and demonstrate the validity of the predictive eye gaze paradigm for measuring syntactic and semantic aspects of linguistic predictions, as well as for investigating their neural substrates.
人们普遍认为语言预测是语言理解的一个不可或缺的部分。然而,其存在的实验证据仍然具有挑战性。在这里,我们引入了一种新的预测性眼动阅读任务,该任务结合了眼动追踪和功能磁共振成像(fMRI),使我们能够通过预期眼动来推断语言预测的存在和时间。参与者阅读不同类型的单词序列(即常规句子、无意义的胡言乱语句子、非单词列表),直到倒数第二个单词。最后一个目标单词会有时间延迟显示,其屏幕位置取决于句法单词类别(名词与动词)。在延迟期间,进入正确目标单词区域的预期眼动表明了语言预测。对于fMRI分析,将预测性句子条件与非单词条件进行对比,预期眼动确定了不同条件下时间上的差异。对两种句子条件的联合分析揭示了单词类别预测的神经基础,即包括语言系统、基底神经节、丘脑和海马体在内的皮质和皮质下脑区的分布式网络。常规句子条件和胡言乱语条件之间的直接对比表明,在无意义的胡言乱语句子中对单词类别的预测依赖于经典的左半球语言系统,包括左额下回的布罗德曼44/45区、左颞上区和背侧尾状核。相比之下,常规句子允许对特定单词进行预测。特定单词的预测与更广泛分布的颞叶和顶叶皮质系统特别相关,最显著的是在右半球。我们的结果支持句子处理过程中存在语言预测,并证明了预测性眼动范式在测量语言预测的句法和语义方面以及研究其神经基础方面的有效性。