Suppr超能文献

为什么旁观者会报告亲密伴侣暴力?实际干预者的真实生活推理洞察。

Why Do Bystanders Report Intimate Partner Violence? Insights into Real-Life Reasoning from Those Who Actually Intervened.

机构信息

Netherlands Institute for the Study of Crime and Law Enforcement (NSCR), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Interpers Violence. 2024 Jul;39(13-14):3207-3238. doi: 10.1177/08862605241227156. Epub 2024 Feb 5.

Abstract

As intimate partner violence (IPV) often remains unknown to police, bystanders can play a crucial role in prevention and further escalation of IPV. However, little is known about what brings them into action by reporting incidents of IPV to authorities. As such, we use statements of bystanders who filed reports about IPV incidents to an official domestic violence agency in the Netherlands ( = 78), to investigate the reasoning and motivations for reporting their suspicions. Results show that the reasons for bystanders to report IPV differ depending on the relational dynamics between partners. In situations perceived as , involving a hierarchical abusive relationship between a man offender and a woman victim, bystanders primarily reported when previous helping initiatives proved inefficient, and they did so to prevent further harm, often particularly in relation to the woman victim. In situations perceived as , involving a symmetrical abusive relationship, bystanders primarily reported when escalation appeared, and they did so to prevent further harm to involved children. We conclude that bystanders report IPV incidents when the need for help is clear, and their motivation for acting concerns the well-being of victims. Our findings add to the growing body of evidence about real-life bystander intervention in emergencies and highlight the need for understanding intervention as context-specific in order to design effective intervention initiatives.

摘要

由于亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)常常不为警方所知,旁观者在预防和进一步升级 IPV 方面可以发挥关键作用。然而,对于是什么促使他们向当局报告 IPV 事件,我们知之甚少。因此,我们使用向荷兰一家官方家庭暴力机构报告 IPV 事件的旁观者的陈述( = 78),来调查他们报告怀疑的理由和动机。结果表明,旁观者报告 IPV 的原因取决于伴侣之间的关系动态。在被视为 的情况下,涉及到一个男性施害者和一个女性受害者之间存在等级制的虐待关系,旁观者主要在先前的援助行动被证明无效时报告,他们这样做是为了防止进一步的伤害,通常特别是与女性受害者有关。在被视为 的情况下,涉及到一种对称的虐待关系,旁观者主要在出现升级时报告,他们这样做是为了防止涉及的孩子受到进一步的伤害。我们得出的结论是,当需要帮助的情况变得明显时,旁观者会报告 IPV 事件,他们采取行动的动机是关心受害者的幸福。我们的研究结果增加了关于现实生活中旁观者在紧急情况下干预的越来越多的证据,并强调需要理解干预是具体情境的,以便设计有效的干预举措。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验