• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肥育猪场良好牲畜饲养规范认证中的动物福利评估。

Assessment of animal welfare in fattening pig farms certified in good livestock practices.

机构信息

Porkcolombia Association-FNP. Animal Welfare Program, Bogota, Colombia.

Cienvet Group. Faculty of Agrarian and Animal Sciences, University of Caldas, Manizales, Colombia.

出版信息

J Appl Anim Welf Sci. 2024 Jan-Mar;27(1):33-45. doi: 10.1080/10888705.2021.2021532. Epub 2022 Jan 4.

DOI:10.1080/10888705.2021.2021532
PMID:38314792
Abstract

Commercial swine producers are responsible for implementing changes in their production systems to ensure animal welfare. The objective of this study is to evaluate the levels of animal welfare on rearing and fattening farms certified in good animal husbandry practices using the Welfare Quality® protocol. Eighty-one certified commercial farms (n = 2,150 pigs), distributed in six geographical areas of Colombia, were evaluatedby six trained veterinarians. . A multilevel analysis was performed to identify variables associated with the animal welfare/farm rating and to identify behavioral variables. Farms evaluated had an enhanced (n = 68, 83.9%), followed by excellent (n = 7, 8.7%) and acceptable (n = 6, 7.4%) level of animal welfare. Variables significantly associated with the overall protocol rating (R2 = 0.37) were temperature comfort (OR: 1.05, p = 0.008), absence of disease (OR: 1.06, p = 0.02) and absence of pain (OR: 1.06, p = 0.0001). Significant differences in behavioral measures were observed across farms (P < 0.05). The high animal welfare scores of certified farms suggest changes in producers' understanding and attitudes towards production and animal welfare.

摘要

商业养猪户负责改变其生产系统,以确保动物福利。本研究旨在使用福利质量协议评估经良好畜牧业实践认证的饲养和育肥农场的动物福利水平。6 名经过培训的兽医对分布在哥伦比亚 6 个地理区域的 81 家经认证的商业农场(n=2150 头猪)进行了评估。进行了多水平分析,以确定与动物福利/农场评级相关的变量,并确定行为变量。评估的农场具有增强(n=68,83.9%)、优秀(n=7,8.7%)和可接受(n=6,7.4%)的动物福利水平。与整体方案评分显著相关的变量(R2=0.37)是温度舒适度(OR:1.05,p=0.008)、无疾病(OR:1.06,p=0.02)和无疼痛(OR:1.06,p=0.0001)。在不同的农场之间观察到行为措施存在显著差异(P<0.05)。经认证的农场具有较高的动物福利评分,这表明生产者对生产和动物福利的理解和态度发生了变化。

相似文献

1
Assessment of animal welfare in fattening pig farms certified in good livestock practices.肥育猪场良好牲畜饲养规范认证中的动物福利评估。
J Appl Anim Welf Sci. 2024 Jan-Mar;27(1):33-45. doi: 10.1080/10888705.2021.2021532. Epub 2022 Jan 4.
2
The "Real Welfare" scheme: Identification of risk and protective factors for welfare outcomes in commercial pig farms in the UK.“真实福利”计划:英国商业养猪场福利结果的风险与保护因素识别
Prev Vet Med. 2017 Oct 1;146:34-43. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2017.07.008. Epub 2017 Jul 17.
3
An epidemiological analysis of the level of biosecurity and animal welfare on pig farms in Japan and their effect on the use of veterinary antimicrobials.日本猪场生物安全水平与动物福利及其对兽用抗菌药物使用影响的流行病学分析
J Vet Med Sci. 2018 Dec 11;80(12):1853-1860. doi: 10.1292/jvms.18-0287. Epub 2018 Oct 29.
4
Animal-based measures on fattening heavy pigs at the slaughterhouse and the association with animal welfare at the farm level: a preliminary study.屠宰场育肥肥猪的基于动物的措施及其与农场动物福利的关联:一项初步研究。
Animal. 2020 Jan;14(1):108-118. doi: 10.1017/S1751731119001320. Epub 2019 Jun 14.
5
High biosecurity and welfare standards in fattening pig farms are associated with reduced antimicrobial use.在育肥猪场采用高生物安全和福利标准与减少抗菌药物的使用有关。
Animal. 2020 Oct;14(10):2178-2186. doi: 10.1017/S1751731120000828. Epub 2020 Apr 30.
6
Does group size have an impact on welfare indicators in fattening pigs?猪群规模对育肥猪的福利指标有影响吗?
Animal. 2016 Jan;10(1):142-9. doi: 10.1017/S1751731115001779. Epub 2015 Aug 25.
7
Human-animal relationship influences husbandry practices, animal welfare and productivity in pig farming.人畜关系影响养猪业的饲养实践、动物福利和生产力。
Animal. 2021 Feb;15(2):100103. doi: 10.1016/j.animal.2020.100103. Epub 2020 Dec 15.
8
Inter- and intra-observer reliability of animal welfare indicators for the on-farm self-assessment of fattening pigs.肥育猪场自我评估用动物福利指标的观察者间和观察者内可靠性。
Animal. 2019 Aug;13(8):1712-1720. doi: 10.1017/S1751731118003701. Epub 2019 Jan 11.
9
My pigs are ok, why change? - animal welfare accounts of pig farmers.我的猪很好,为什么要改变?-养猪户的动物福利账目。
Animal. 2021 Mar;15(3):100154. doi: 10.1016/j.animal.2020.100154. Epub 2021 Jan 9.
10
Can improving animal health and biosecurity knowledge of para-veterinarians in Cambodia assist in addressing challenges in smallholder livestock farming?提高柬埔寨准兽医的动物健康和生物安全知识能否有助于应对小农户畜牧业面临的挑战?
Transbound Emerg Dis. 2022 Mar;69(2):559-569. doi: 10.1111/tbed.14020. Epub 2021 Feb 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Natural Savannah Systems Within the "One Welfare" Approach: Part 1-Good Farmers' Perspectives, Environmental Challenges and Opportunities.“同一健康”理念下的天然稀树草原系统:第1部分——优秀农民的观点、环境挑战与机遇
Animals (Basel). 2025 Feb 26;15(5):677. doi: 10.3390/ani15050677.