Suppr超能文献

急性前交叉韧带撕裂的治疗。

Treatment for Acute Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tear in Young Active Adults.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Orthopedics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.

Department of Radiology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.

出版信息

NEJM Evid. 2023 Aug;2(8):EVIDoa2200287. doi: 10.1056/EVIDoa2200287. Epub 2023 Jun 26.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury of the knee is common in young active adults and often has severe and sometimes lifelong consequences. The clinical management of this injury remains debated. A prior trial of early versus delayed optional ACL repair showed no differences in outcomes at 2 years. METHODS: We present the 11-year follow-up of a randomized clinical trial involving 121 young active adults (mean age 26yo, 74% male) with an acute sports-related ACL tear. We compared patient-reported and radiographic outcomes between those randomized to receive early ACL reconstruction (ACLR) followed by exercise therapy (N=62) and those treated with early exercise therapy plus optional delayed ACLR (N=59). The primary end point at 11 years was change from baseline in the mean of four subscales of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) — pain, symptoms, function in sports and recreation, and knee-related quality of life (KOOS4; range of scores, 0 [worst] to 100 [best]; minimal important change=9). RESULTS: In all, 88% of the cohort followed up at 11 years (53/62 in the early vs. 54/59 in the optional late ACL repair groups), and 52% of those assigned to optional delayed ACLR underwent ACLR. Mean improvement in KOOS4 from baseline to 11 years was 46 points for those assigned to early ACLR plus exercise therapy and 45 points for those assigned to exercise therapy plus optional delayed ACLR (between-group difference, 1.6 points; 95% confidence interval [CI], −8.8 to 5.6; P=0.67 after adjustment for baseline score, full analysis set). About two thirds of the full cohort reported meeting the case definition for a “patient-acceptable symptom state” (KOOS4 patient-acceptable symptom state threshold value=79), whereas 44% had developed radiographic osteoarthritis of their injured knee. Mean summed incident radiographic osteoarthritis feature scores, scores range from 0 to 30 where higher scores indicate more severe joint damage, were 2.4 for the group assigned to early ACLR and 1.0 for the group assigned to exercise therapy plus optional delayed ACLR (mean difference, 1.0; 95% CI, 0.1 to 1.9). CONCLUSIONS: At 11-year follow-up, among young active adults with acute ACL tears assigned to early ACLR plus exercise versus initial exercise therapy with the option of delayed ACLR, there were no differences in patient-reported outcomes. (Funded by the Swedish Research Council; ISRCTN number, ISRCTN84752559.)

摘要

背景

膝关节前交叉韧带(ACL)损伤在年轻活跃的成年人中很常见,且常导致严重甚至有时是终身的后果。这种损伤的临床管理仍存在争议。一项关于早期与延迟选择性 ACL 修复的试验表明,在 2 年时,两种治疗方案的结果无差异。

方法

我们报告了一项随机临床试验的 11 年随访结果,该试验纳入了 121 名急性运动相关 ACL 撕裂的年轻活跃成年人(平均年龄 26 岁,74%为男性)。我们比较了接受早期 ACL 重建(ACLR)加运动治疗(n=62)和早期运动治疗加选择性延迟 ACLR(n=59)的患者的患者报告和影像学结局。11 年时的主要终点是膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结果评分(KOOS)的四个亚量表(疼痛、症状、运动和娱乐功能以及膝关节相关生活质量)的平均变化,范围为 0(最差)到 100(最佳)分;最小临床重要差异=9 分。

结果

共有 88%的队列在 11 年时进行了随访(早期组 53/62,可选延迟 ACLR 组 54/59),52%被分配到可选延迟 ACLR 的患者接受了 ACLR。与基线相比,接受早期 ACLR 加运动治疗的患者 KOOS4 平均改善 46 分,接受运动治疗加可选延迟 ACLR 的患者改善 45 分(两组间差异,1.6 分;95%置信区间,-8.8 至 5.6;经基线评分和全分析集调整后,P=0.67)。大约三分之二的全队列报告符合“患者可接受的症状状态”的病例定义(KOOS4 患者可接受的症状状态阈值=79),而 44%的患者受伤的膝关节出现放射学骨关节炎。与接受早期 ACLR 的组相比,接受早期 ACLR 加运动治疗的组的综合放射学骨关节炎特征评分平均高 1.0 分(评分范围为 0 至 30 分,得分越高表明关节损伤越严重),该组的评分 1.0,接受运动治疗加可选延迟 ACLR 的组的评分为 0.1(平均差值,1.0;95%置信区间,0.1 至 1.9)。

结论

在急性 ACL 撕裂的年轻活跃成年人中,与早期 ACLR 加运动治疗相比,初始运动治疗加选择性延迟 ACLR 的治疗方案,患者报告的结局无差异。(由瑞典研究理事会资助;ISRCTN 编号,ISRCTN84752559。)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验