Suppr超能文献

术后乳腺癌患者采用低分割和常规分割放疗的疗效和安全性分析。

Efficacy and safety analysis of hypofractionated and conventional fractionated radiotherapy in postoperative breast cancer patients.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, No.277, Yanta West Road, Xi'an, 710061, Shaanxi, China.

Department of Radiation Oncology, Shaanxi Provincial Tumor Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, Xi'an, China.

出版信息

BMC Cancer. 2024 Feb 6;24(1):181. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-11918-2.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

In this meta-analysis, we conducted a comparative analysis of the safety and efficacy of hypofractionated and conventional fractionated radiotherapy in individuals who had undergone surgery for breast cancer.

METHODS

This study involved a systematic and independent review of relevant research articles published in reputable databases such as PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. Two investigators conducted the review, which included studies published up to January 3, 2023. The quality of the eligible studies was evaluated and data were extracted using Review Manager software 5.4 (RevMan 5.4) to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

The analysis comprised 35 studies and encompassed a collective sample of 18,246 individuals diagnosed with breast cancer. We did not find a statistically significant disparity in efficacy between conventional fractionated (CF) radiotherapy and hypofractionated (HF) radiotherapy regarding local recurrence (LR; OR = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.76-1.09, P = 0.30), disease-free survival (DFS; OR = 1.20, 95% CI: 1.01-1.42, P = 0.03), and overall survival (OS; OR = 1.08, 95% CI: 0.93-1.26, P = 0.28). Concerning safety, there was no significant difference between the HF and CF regimens in terms of breast pain, breast atrophy, lymphedema, pneumonia, pulmonary fibrosis, telangiectasia, and cardiotoxicity. However, the HF regimen resulted in lower skin toxicity (OR = 0.43, 95% CI: 0.33-0.55, P < 0.01) and improved patient fatigue outcomes (OR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.60 - 0.88, P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Although there is no substantial difference in LR, DFS, OS, or many other side effects between the HF and CF regimens, the HF regimen reduces skin toxicity and relieves patient fatigue. If these two issues need to be addressed in clinical situations, the HF regimen may be a superior alternative to conventional radiotherapy in postoperative breast cancer patients.

摘要

目的

本荟萃分析对乳腺癌手术后接受常规分割放疗和低分割放疗的个体的安全性和疗效进行了比较分析。

方法

本研究系统地独立检索了 Pubmed、Embase、Cochrane 图书馆和 Web of Science 等知名数据库中发表的相关研究文章。两名研究者对截至 2023 年 1 月 3 日发表的研究进行了综述。使用 Review Manager 软件 5.4(RevMan 5.4)评估合格研究的质量并提取数据,以计算比值比(OR)和 95%置信区间(CI)。

结果

该分析共纳入 35 项研究,共纳入 18246 名乳腺癌患者。我们没有发现常规分割放疗(CF)和低分割放疗(HF)在局部复发(LR;OR=0.91,95%CI:0.76-1.09,P=0.30)、无病生存(DFS;OR=1.20,95%CI:1.01-1.42,P=0.03)和总生存(OS;OR=1.08,95%CI:0.93-1.26,P=0.28)方面的疗效存在统计学差异。关于安全性,HF 组和 CF 组在乳房疼痛、乳房萎缩、淋巴水肿、肺炎、肺纤维化、毛细血管扩张和心脏毒性方面无显著差异。然而,HF 方案导致皮肤毒性较低(OR=0.43,95%CI:0.33-0.55,P<0.01),并改善了患者的疲劳结局(OR=0.73,95%CI:0.60-0.88,P<0.01)。

结论

虽然 HF 组和 CF 组在 LR、DFS、OS 或许多其他不良反应方面没有显著差异,但 HF 组降低了皮肤毒性,缓解了患者的疲劳。如果这两个问题在临床情况下需要解决,HF 方案可能是乳腺癌术后患者常规放疗的替代方案。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aca2/10845660/39940c32d29f/12885_2024_11918_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验