University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Orlando Health UF Health Cancer Center, Orlando, Florida.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2021 Oct 1;111(2):360-370. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.05.004. Epub 2021 May 13.
There are limited prospective data on predictors of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) after whole-breast irradiation (WBI) plus a boost. We sought to characterize longitudinal PROs and cosmesis in a randomized trial comparing conventionally fractionated (CF) versus hypofractionated (HF) WBI.
From 2011 to 2014, women aged ≥40 years with Tis-T2 N0-N1a M0 breast cancer who underwent a lumpectomy with negative margins were randomized to CF-WBI (50 Gray [Gy]/25 fractions plus boost) versus HF-WBI (42.56 Gy/16 fractions plus boost). At baseline (pre-radiation), at 6 months, and yearly thereafter through 5 years, PROs included the Breast Cancer Treatment Outcome Scale (BCTOS), Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast (FACT-B), and Body Image Scale; cosmesis was reported by the treating physician using Radiation Therapy Oncology Group cosmesis values. Multivariable mixed-effects growth curve models evaluated associations of the treatment arm and patient factors with outcomes and tested for relevant interactions with the treatment arm.
A total of 287 patients were randomized, completing a total of 14,801 PRO assessments. The median age was 60 years, 37% of patients had a bra cup size ≥D, 44% were obese, and 30% received chemotherapy. Through 5 years, there were no significant differences in PROs or cosmesis by treatment arm. A bra cup size ≥D was associated with worse BCTOS cosmesis (P < .001), BCTOS pain (P = .001), FACT-B Trial Outcome Index (P = .03), FACT-B Emotional Well-being (P = .03), and Body Image Scale (P = .003) scores. Physician-rated cosmesis was worse in patients who were overweight (P = .02) or obese (P < .001). No patient subsets experienced better PROs or cosmesis with CF-WBI.
Both CF-WBI and HF-WBI confer similar longitudinal PROs and physician-rated cosmesis through 5 years of follow-up, with no relevant subsets that fared better with CF-WBI. This evidence supports broad adoption of hypofractionation with boost, including in patients receiving chemotherapy and in a population with a high prevalence of obesity. The associations of large breast size and obesity with adverse outcomes across multiple domains highlight the opportunity to engage at-risk patients in lifestyle intervention strategies, as well as to consider alternative radiation treatment regimens.
全乳照射(WBI)加局部推量后患者报告结局(PRO)的预测因素的前瞻性数据有限。我们旨在通过比较常规分割(CF)与低分割(HF)WBI 的随机试验,描述纵向 PRO 和美容效果。
2011 年至 2014 年,年龄≥40 岁的 Tis-T2 N0-N1a M0 乳腺癌患者接受保乳切除术且切缘阴性后,被随机分为 CF-WBI(50Gy/25 次分割加推量)与 HF-WBI(42.56Gy/16 次分割加推量)。基线(放疗前)、6 个月、此后每年直至 5 年时,PRO 包括乳腺癌治疗结局量表(BCTOS)、癌症治疗功能评估-乳房(FACT-B)和身体形象量表;美容效果由治疗医生使用放射治疗肿瘤学组美容效果值进行报告。多变量混合效应增长曲线模型评估了治疗臂和患者因素与结局的关联,并测试了与治疗臂的相关交互作用。
共 287 例患者随机分组,共完成 14801 次 PRO 评估。中位年龄为 60 岁,37%的患者乳房罩杯尺寸≥D,44%的患者肥胖,30%的患者接受化疗。5 年内,治疗臂之间的 PRO 或美容效果无显著差异。D 罩杯以上的乳房尺寸与 BCTOS 美容效果较差(P<.001)、BCTOS 疼痛(P=.001)、FACT-B 试验结局指数(P=.03)、FACT-B 情绪健康(P=.03)和身体形象量表(P=.003)评分差相关。超重患者(P=.02)或肥胖患者(P<.001)的医生评价美容效果较差。CF-WBI 并未使任何亚组患者的 PRO 或美容效果更好。
CF-WBI 和 HF-WBI 在 5 年的随访中均提供相似的纵向 PRO 和医生评价的美容效果,无 CF-WBI 更优的相关亚组。这一证据支持广泛采用带推量的低分割,包括在接受化疗的患者和肥胖发生率较高的人群中。大乳房尺寸和肥胖与多个领域的不良结局相关,突出了使高危患者参与生活方式干预策略的机会,以及考虑替代放疗方案的机会。