Suppr超能文献

常规分割与低分割全乳放疗随机试验中患者报告结局和美容效果的 5 年纵向分析。

Five-Year Longitudinal Analysis of Patient-Reported Outcomes and Cosmesis in a Randomized Trial of Conventionally Fractionated Versus Hypofractionated Whole-Breast Irradiation.

机构信息

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.

Orlando Health UF Health Cancer Center, Orlando, Florida.

出版信息

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2021 Oct 1;111(2):360-370. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.05.004. Epub 2021 May 13.

Abstract

PURPOSE

There are limited prospective data on predictors of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) after whole-breast irradiation (WBI) plus a boost. We sought to characterize longitudinal PROs and cosmesis in a randomized trial comparing conventionally fractionated (CF) versus hypofractionated (HF) WBI.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From 2011 to 2014, women aged ≥40 years with Tis-T2 N0-N1a M0 breast cancer who underwent a lumpectomy with negative margins were randomized to CF-WBI (50 Gray [Gy]/25 fractions plus boost) versus HF-WBI (42.56 Gy/16 fractions plus boost). At baseline (pre-radiation), at 6 months, and yearly thereafter through 5 years, PROs included the Breast Cancer Treatment Outcome Scale (BCTOS), Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast (FACT-B), and Body Image Scale; cosmesis was reported by the treating physician using Radiation Therapy Oncology Group cosmesis values. Multivariable mixed-effects growth curve models evaluated associations of the treatment arm and patient factors with outcomes and tested for relevant interactions with the treatment arm.

RESULTS

A total of 287 patients were randomized, completing a total of 14,801 PRO assessments. The median age was 60 years, 37% of patients had a bra cup size ≥D, 44% were obese, and 30% received chemotherapy. Through 5 years, there were no significant differences in PROs or cosmesis by treatment arm. A bra cup size ≥D was associated with worse BCTOS cosmesis (P < .001), BCTOS pain (P = .001), FACT-B Trial Outcome Index (P = .03), FACT-B Emotional Well-being (P = .03), and Body Image Scale (P = .003) scores. Physician-rated cosmesis was worse in patients who were overweight (P = .02) or obese (P < .001). No patient subsets experienced better PROs or cosmesis with CF-WBI.

CONCLUSIONS

Both CF-WBI and HF-WBI confer similar longitudinal PROs and physician-rated cosmesis through 5 years of follow-up, with no relevant subsets that fared better with CF-WBI. This evidence supports broad adoption of hypofractionation with boost, including in patients receiving chemotherapy and in a population with a high prevalence of obesity. The associations of large breast size and obesity with adverse outcomes across multiple domains highlight the opportunity to engage at-risk patients in lifestyle intervention strategies, as well as to consider alternative radiation treatment regimens.

摘要

目的

全乳照射(WBI)加局部推量后患者报告结局(PRO)的预测因素的前瞻性数据有限。我们旨在通过比较常规分割(CF)与低分割(HF)WBI 的随机试验,描述纵向 PRO 和美容效果。

方法和材料

2011 年至 2014 年,年龄≥40 岁的 Tis-T2 N0-N1a M0 乳腺癌患者接受保乳切除术且切缘阴性后,被随机分为 CF-WBI(50Gy/25 次分割加推量)与 HF-WBI(42.56Gy/16 次分割加推量)。基线(放疗前)、6 个月、此后每年直至 5 年时,PRO 包括乳腺癌治疗结局量表(BCTOS)、癌症治疗功能评估-乳房(FACT-B)和身体形象量表;美容效果由治疗医生使用放射治疗肿瘤学组美容效果值进行报告。多变量混合效应增长曲线模型评估了治疗臂和患者因素与结局的关联,并测试了与治疗臂的相关交互作用。

结果

共 287 例患者随机分组,共完成 14801 次 PRO 评估。中位年龄为 60 岁,37%的患者乳房罩杯尺寸≥D,44%的患者肥胖,30%的患者接受化疗。5 年内,治疗臂之间的 PRO 或美容效果无显著差异。D 罩杯以上的乳房尺寸与 BCTOS 美容效果较差(P<.001)、BCTOS 疼痛(P=.001)、FACT-B 试验结局指数(P=.03)、FACT-B 情绪健康(P=.03)和身体形象量表(P=.003)评分差相关。超重患者(P=.02)或肥胖患者(P<.001)的医生评价美容效果较差。CF-WBI 并未使任何亚组患者的 PRO 或美容效果更好。

结论

CF-WBI 和 HF-WBI 在 5 年的随访中均提供相似的纵向 PRO 和医生评价的美容效果,无 CF-WBI 更优的相关亚组。这一证据支持广泛采用带推量的低分割,包括在接受化疗的患者和肥胖发生率较高的人群中。大乳房尺寸和肥胖与多个领域的不良结局相关,突出了使高危患者参与生活方式干预策略的机会,以及考虑替代放疗方案的机会。

相似文献

3
Quantitative Assessment of Breast Cosmetic Outcome After Whole-Breast Irradiation.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017 Apr 1;97(5):894-902. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.12.021. Epub 2016 Dec 21.
4
Patient-Reported Outcomes and Cosmesis After Once-Weekly Hypofractionated Breast Irradiation in Medically Underserved Patients.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2020 Aug 1;107(5):934-942. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.04.041. Epub 2020 May 6.
8
Optimizing Preventive Adjuvant Linac-Based (OPAL) Radiation: A Phase 2 Trial of Daily Partial Breast Irradiation.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2023 Mar 1;115(3):629-644. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.09.083. Epub 2022 Oct 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Selective Elimination of Breast Surgery for Invasive Breast Cancer: A Nonrandomized Clinical Trial.
JAMA Oncol. 2025 May 1;11(5):529-534. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2025.0207.
2
Quality of Life Outcomes in Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Chemotherapy With or Without Radiation Therapy.
Clin Breast Cancer. 2025 Jan;25(1):e86-e93. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2024.08.015. Epub 2024 Aug 30.
3
5
Accelerated partial breast irradiation: Current evidence and future developments.
Cancer Innov. 2024 Jan 22;3(1):e106. doi: 10.1002/cai2.106. eCollection 2024 Feb.
9
Quantification of breast lymphoedema following conservative breast cancer treatment: a systematic review.
J Cancer Surviv. 2023 Dec;17(6):1669-1687. doi: 10.1007/s11764-022-01278-w. Epub 2022 Oct 27.
10
Optimizing Preventive Adjuvant Linac-Based (OPAL) Radiation: A Phase 2 Trial of Daily Partial Breast Irradiation.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2023 Mar 1;115(3):629-644. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.09.083. Epub 2022 Oct 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Body weight management in overweight and obese breast cancer survivors.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Dec 11;12(12):CD012110. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012110.pub2.
4
Calidad de Vida: a systematic review of quality of life in Latino cancer survivors in the USA.
Qual Life Res. 2020 Oct;29(10):2615-2630. doi: 10.1007/s11136-020-02527-0. Epub 2020 May 19.
9
Prevalence of pain in patients with breast cancer post-treatment: A systematic review.
Breast. 2018 Dec;42:113-127. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2018.08.105. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
10
Trends in Lumpectomy and Oncoplastic Breast-Conserving Surgery in the US, 2011-2016.
Ann Surg Oncol. 2018 Dec;25(13):3867-3873. doi: 10.1245/s10434-018-6760-7. Epub 2018 Sep 21.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验