Andrade Adriana Neves de, Sanfins Milaine Dominici, Skarzynska Magdalena Beata, Skarzynski Piotr Henryk, Gil Daniela
Departament of Speech Therapy, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Postgraduate Program in Audiology, Albert Einstein Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2023 Sep 26;28(1):e122-e128. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1759748. eCollection 2024 Jan.
Peripheral hearing loss, besides causing inadequate auditory input, can lead to distortions in the tonotopic auditory map and reorganization of neural networks. Therefore, the processing of temporal aspects of a sound stimulus and, consequently, the effectiveness of human communication can be negatively impacted. To test the temporal ordering and auditory resolution of people with mild and moderate sensorineural hearing loss and to compare them with the those of people with normal hearing. A total of 19 right-handed individuals aged 16 to 59 years with mild to moderate postlingually acquired symmetric bilateral sensorineural hearing loss participated in the study. They were submitted to frequency and duration pattern tests and a random gap detection test. The mean correct response rate in the frequency pattern test was of 66.3%, and, in the duration pattern test, 71.7%. The mean threshold in the random gap detection test was of 14.1 ms. A comparison with the criteria established for normal subjects without peripheral hearing loss revealed that more than half the subjects had abnormal results in the temporal ordering test, while a smaller fraction had reduced temporal resolution. The performance of the subjects with acquired sensorineural hearing loss was poorer than that of the participants without peripheral hearing loss. Their results on the temporal ordering test were also poorer than in the temporal resolution test, demonstrating the importance of analyzing both these auditory skills in people with peripheral hearing loss.
除了导致听觉输入不足外,外周性听力损失还可能导致声调听觉图谱的扭曲以及神经网络的重组。因此,声音刺激的时间特征处理以及人类交流的有效性可能会受到负面影响。为了测试轻度和中度感音神经性听力损失患者的时间排序和听觉分辨率,并将其与正常听力者进行比较。共有19名年龄在16至59岁之间的右利手个体参与了该研究,他们患有轻度至中度的语后获得性对称性双侧感音神经性听力损失。他们接受了频率和时长模式测试以及随机间隙检测测试。频率模式测试中的平均正确反应率为66.3%,时长模式测试中的平均正确反应率为71.7%。随机间隙检测测试中的平均阈值为14.1毫秒。与为无外周性听力损失的正常受试者设定的标准进行比较发现,但超过一半的受试者在时间排序测试中结果异常,而在时间分辨率测试中结果异常的受试者比例较小。获得性感音神经性听力损失患者的表现比无外周性听力损失的参与者差。他们在时间排序测试中的结果也比时间分辨率测试中的结果差,这表明分析外周性听力损失患者的这两种听觉技能的重要性。