Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Acta Derm Venereol. 2024 Feb 7;104:adv19454. doi: 10.2340/actadv.v104.19454.
Limited daily practice data on the effect of abrocitinib in patients with atopic dermatitis are available. The aim of this multicentre prospective study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of abrocitinib in patients with atopic dermatitis treated in daily practice. In a subgroup, the effectiveness of abrocitinib on hand eczema was evaluated. A total of 103 patients from the BioDay registry were included in the study: week 4 (n = 95), week 16 (n = 61) and week 28 (n = 39). At week 28, the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI)-50/75/90 was achieved by 81.8%, 57.6%, and 18.2%, respectively, and the weekly average pruritus numerical rating scale ≤ 4 by 62.9%. The effectiveness of abrocitinib was not significantly different between dupilumab non-responders and dupilumab-naïve patients/responders, and between upadacitinib non-responders and upadacitinib-naïve patients/responders. Mean ± standard deviation Hand Eczema Severity Index decreased from 27.4 ± 27.7 at baseline to 7.7 ± 12.1 at week 28 (n = 31). Thirty-two patients (31.1%) discontinued treatment due to ineffectiveness (n = 17), adverse events (n = 9) or both (n = 3). The most frequently reported adverse event was nausea (n = 28). In conclusion, abrocitinib is an effective treatment for atopic dermatitis and can be effective for patients with previous inadequate response to dupilumab or upadacitinib. Furthermore, hand eczema can improve in patients treated with abrocitinib for atopic dermatitis.
关于阿泊替尼在特应性皮炎患者中的每日实践数据有限。本多中心前瞻性研究旨在评估阿泊替尼治疗特应性皮炎患者的有效性和安全性。在亚组中,评估了阿泊替尼对手部湿疹的疗效。共纳入 BioDay 登记处的 103 例患者:第 4 周(n=95)、第 16 周(n=61)和第 28 周(n=39)。第 28 周时,EASI-50/75/90 分别达到 81.8%、57.6%和 18.2%,每周平均瘙痒数字评定量表≤4 为 62.9%。阿泊替尼在度普利尤单抗无应答者和度普利尤单抗初治/应答者、乌帕替尼无应答者和乌帕替尼初治/应答者之间的疗效无显著差异。基线时平均手湿疹严重程度指数(HECSI)为 27.4±27.7,第 28 周时降至 7.7±12.1(n=31)。由于无效(n=17)、不良事件(n=9)或两者(n=3),32 例(31.1%)患者停止治疗。最常见的不良事件为恶心(n=28)。结论,阿泊替尼是一种有效的特应性皮炎治疗药物,对先前对度普利尤单抗或乌帕替尼治疗反应不足的患者可能有效。此外,阿泊替尼治疗特应性皮炎可改善手部湿疹。