• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

男性和女性中单支与多支冠状动脉旁路移植术:来自波兰心脏手术程序国家注册中心的结果。

Single versus multiple arterial coronary artery bypass grafting in men and women: results from Polish National Registry of Cardiac Surgery Procedures.

机构信息

Department of Cardiac Surgery, Zbigniew Religa Heart Center 'Medinet', Nowa Sol.

Department of Cardiac Surgery and Interventional Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Sciences, University of Zielona Gora, Zielona Gora.

出版信息

Int J Surg. 2024 Apr 1;110(4):2234-2242. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001133.

DOI:10.1097/JS9.0000000000001133
PMID:38324262
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11020110/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The objective of this multicenter study aimed to investigate the impact of sex on long-term survival among patients with multivessel coronary artery disease undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) using multiple arterial grafting (MAG) or a single artery with saphenous vein grafts.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data were obtained from the Polish National Registry of Cardiac Surgery Procedures database. This study included 81 136 patients who underwent CABG for multivessel disease between January 2012 and December 2020 (22.9 were women and 77.1% were men). MAG was performed in 8.3 and 11.7% of female and male patients, respectively. A 1:1 propensity score (PS)-matching was performed. Long-term mortality was compared between matched groups of men and women. Subgroup analyses of patients aged <70 and ≥70 years, with an ejection fraction (EF) >40% and ≤40%, and with and without diabetes, obesity, peripheral artery disease (PAD), or chronic lung disease (CLD) were performed separately in women and men.

RESULTS

MAG was associated with lower long-term mortality than saphenous vein grafts in 1528 PS-matched female pairs [hazard ratio (HR): 0.74; 95% CI: 0.59-0.92; P =0.007) and 7283 PS-matched male pairs (HR: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.72-0.88; P <0.001). Subgroup analyses confirmed the results among female patients aged <70 years, with diabetes and EF >40%, and without PAD or CLD, and of male patients aged <70 and ≥70 years; with EF >40%; with or without diabetes, obesity, or PAD; and without CLD.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients undergoing CABG, MAG was associated with significantly improved survival in both sexes. The long-term benefits of MAG observed across subgroups of men and women support the consideration of a multiarterial revascularization strategy for a broader spectrum of patients.

摘要

背景

本多中心研究旨在探讨性别对接受冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)治疗多支冠状动脉疾病患者长期生存的影响,这些患者采用了多动脉吻合(MAG)或单一动脉加隐静脉吻合。

材料和方法

数据来自波兰全国心脏手术程序数据库。本研究纳入了 2012 年 1 月至 2020 年 12 月期间接受多支血管疾病 CABG 的 81136 例患者(女性占 22.9%,男性占 77.1%)。分别有 8.3%和 11.7%的女性和男性患者接受了 MAG。采用 1:1 倾向评分(PS)匹配。比较了男女匹配组之间的长期死亡率。分别对年龄<70 岁和≥70 岁、射血分数(EF)>40%和≤40%、有和无糖尿病、肥胖、外周动脉疾病(PAD)或慢性肺部疾病(CLD)的患者进行了亚组分析。

结果

在 1528 对 PS 匹配的女性患者中,MAG 与隐静脉吻合相比,长期死亡率较低[风险比(HR):0.74;95%可信区间(CI):0.59-0.92;P=0.007],在 7283 对 PS 匹配的男性患者中,长期死亡率也较低[HR:0.80;95%CI:0.72-0.88;P<0.001]。亚组分析证实了在年龄<70 岁、有糖尿病和 EF>40%、无 PAD 或 CLD 的女性患者,以及年龄<70 岁和≥70 岁的男性患者,EF>40%、有或无糖尿病、肥胖或 PAD、无 CLD 的患者中也存在上述结果。

结论

在接受 CABG 的患者中,MAG 与两性患者的生存显著改善相关。在男性和女性患者的亚组中观察到 MAG 的长期获益,支持对更广泛的患者采用多动脉血运重建策略。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2b1/11020110/5ae2384d6f56/js9-110-2234-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2b1/11020110/95926a2f4a2c/js9-110-2234-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2b1/11020110/0a5e5e7a13e7/js9-110-2234-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2b1/11020110/5ae2384d6f56/js9-110-2234-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2b1/11020110/95926a2f4a2c/js9-110-2234-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2b1/11020110/0a5e5e7a13e7/js9-110-2234-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2b1/11020110/5ae2384d6f56/js9-110-2234-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Single versus multiple arterial coronary artery bypass grafting in men and women: results from Polish National Registry of Cardiac Surgery Procedures.男性和女性中单支与多支冠状动脉旁路移植术:来自波兰心脏手术程序国家注册中心的结果。
Int J Surg. 2024 Apr 1;110(4):2234-2242. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001133.
2
Survival Outcomes After Multiple vs Single Arterial Grafting Among Patients With Reduced Ejection Fraction.射血分数降低患者多次与单次动脉移植后的生存结局
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Apr 1;8(4):e254508. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.4508.
3
Impact of Deep Sternal Wound Infection on Long-Term Survival Based on Revascularisation Strategy: Results From the Polish National Registry.基于血运重建策略的深部胸骨伤口感染对长期生存的影响:来自波兰国家登记处的结果
Heart Lung Circ. 2025 Jul 1. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2025.03.016.
4
Surgical Myocardial Revascularization with a Composite T-graft from the Left Internal Mammary Artery-Comparison of the Great Saphenous Vein with the Radial Artery.左内乳动脉复合 T 型移植物行冠状动脉旁路移植术——大隐静脉与桡动脉的比较。
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2024 Sep;72(6):413-422. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1771358. Epub 2023 Jul 28.
5
Outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting in elderly patients: A comprehensive analysis of different surgical approaches (from the KROK Registry).老年患者冠状动脉搭桥术的结局:不同手术方式的综合分析(来自KROK注册研究)
Kardiol Pol. 2025;83(6):716-724. doi: 10.33963/v.phj.105419. Epub 2025 Mar 26.
6
Survival and Mid-Term Outcomes of On Pump vs. Off Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis in A First Peruvian Registry.在泵与非在泵冠状动脉旁路移植术的生存和中期结果:秘鲁首个注册研究中的倾向评分匹配分析。
Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2024 Nov 28;e20230242(e20230242):e20230242. doi: 10.21470/1678-9741-2023-0242.
7
Long-term outcomes of patients undergoing multiarterial grafting in coronary artery bypass grafting: Insights from a Latin American national cohort.冠状动脉旁路移植术中接受多动脉移植患者的长期结局:来自拉丁美洲全国队列的见解。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2025 Jun 9. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2025.05.023.
8
Mortality after coronary artery bypass grafting versus percutaneous coronary intervention with stenting for coronary artery disease: a pooled analysis of individual patient data.冠状动脉旁路移植术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗支架置入治疗冠状动脉疾病的死亡率:一项个体患者数据的合并分析。
Lancet. 2018 Mar 10;391(10124):939-948. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30423-9. Epub 2018 Feb 23.
9
Bypass Versus Endovascular Therapy for Elective Infrapopliteal Interventions in Chronic Limb-threatening Ischemia: Propensity Score-matched Analyses of Vascular Quality Initiative Registry.慢性肢体威胁性缺血患者择期腘下介入治疗中旁路手术与血管内治疗的比较:血管质量倡议注册研究的倾向评分匹配分析
Ann Surg. 2025 Sep 1;282(3):494-502. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006827. Epub 2025 Jul 3.
10
Single or multiple arterial bypass graft surgery vs. percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with three-vessel or left main coronary artery disease.单支或多支动脉旁路移植术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗在三支血管病变或左主干病变患者中的比较。
Eur Heart J. 2022 Mar 31;43(13):1334-1344. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab537.

引用本文的文献

1
Unfavorable impact of female gender on outcomes following aortic valve replacement combined with coronary artery bypass grafting.女性性别对主动脉瓣置换术联合冠状动脉旁路移植术预后的不利影响。
Sci Rep. 2025 May 26;15(1):18299. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-02892-1.