Satomi K, Nishimoto G I
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1985 Dec;10(10):884-90. doi: 10.1097/00007632-198512000-00004.
Spinal cord monitoring during surgery using evoked spinal potentials (ESP) is now popular. In cats, ESPs due to both sciatic nerve (SN-ESP) and spinal cord stimulation (SC-AESP and SC-DESP) were recorded from the epidural space. Both SN-ESP and SC-AESP were compared by parameter studies. Stimulus frequencies up to 100 Hz did not significantly alter the SC-AESP, whereas the later components of the SN-ESP decreased greatly in amplitude. The SN-ESP was more sensitive to asphyxia than the SC-AESP. Augmentation of the ESP occurred approximately 5 minutes after the asphyxia was introduced, which was interpreted as an impending sign of anoxia of the spinal cord. The SN-ESP had more potentials arising from synaptic and postsynaptic activities, while the SC-AESP was mainly derived from the spinal tracts. To monitor the function of the spinal cord, both methods should be used.
目前,手术中使用诱发脊髓电位(ESP)进行脊髓监测很普遍。在猫身上,从硬膜外间隙记录了由坐骨神经(SN-ESP)以及脊髓刺激(SC-AESP和SC-DESP)所产生的ESP。通过参数研究对SN-ESP和SC-AESP进行了比较。高达100Hz的刺激频率并未显著改变SC-AESP,而SN-ESP的后期成分振幅大幅下降。SN-ESP比SC-AESP对窒息更敏感。在引入窒息后约5分钟出现ESP增强,这被解释为脊髓缺氧的先兆迹象。SN-ESP有更多源于突触和突触后活动的电位,而SC-AESP主要源自脊髓束。为监测脊髓功能,两种方法都应使用。