Donnan Jennifer R, Downey Molly, Johnston Karissa, Najafizada Maisam, Bishop Lisa D
School of Pharmacy, Memorial University of Newfoundland School of Pharmacy, 300 Prince Phillip Drive St. John's, NL, A1B 3V6, St. John's, Canada.
Faculty of Science, Department of Psychology, Memorial University, St. John's, NL, Canada.
J Cannabis Res. 2024 Feb 8;6(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s42238-023-00204-w.
With the legalization of cannabis in Canada, consumers are presented with numerous purchase options. Licensed retailers are limited by the Cannabis Act and provincial regulations with respect to offering sales, advertising, location, maximum quantities, and information sharing in an effort to protect public health and safety. The degree these policies influence consumer purchase behavior will help inform regulatory refinement.
A discrete choice experiment within a cross-sectional online survey was used to explore trade-offs consumers make when deciding where to purchase cannabis. Attributes included availability of sales/discounts, proximity, product information, customer service, product variety, and provincial regulation. Participants ≥ 19 years old who lived in Canada and purchased cannabis in the previous 12 months were recruited through an online market research survey panel. A multinomial logit (MNL) model was used for the base model, and latent class analysis was used to assess preference sub-groups. Key limitations included ordering effect, hypothetical bias, and framing effect.
The survey was completed by 1626 people, and the base model showed that customer service carried the most weight in purchase decisions, followed by proximity and availability of sales and discounts. There was considerable heterogeneity in preference patterns, with a five-group latent class model demonstrating best fit. Only one group (15% of sample) placed a high value on the store being provincially regulated, while three groups were willing to make a trade-off with regulation to access better customer service, product information, or closer proximity. One group preferred non-regulated sources (24% of sample); this group was also primarily driven by the availability of sales and discounts. Three groups (60.5% of sample) preferred online stores.
This study highlighted that there exists significant diversity with respect to the influence of consumer experiences on cannabis purchase behaviors. Modifications to cannabis retail regulations that focus on improving access to product information as well as reviewing limitations on sales and discounts could have the most impact for shifting customers to licensed retailers.
随着加拿大大麻合法化,消费者面临众多购买选择。持牌零售商在销售、广告、选址、最大数量和信息共享方面受到《大麻法案》和省级法规的限制,以保护公众健康和安全。这些政策对消费者购买行为的影响程度将有助于为监管完善提供参考。
在横断面在线调查中采用离散选择实验,以探究消费者在决定何处购买大麻时所做的权衡。属性包括销售/折扣的可用性、距离、产品信息、客户服务、产品种类和省级监管。通过在线市场研究调查小组招募了年龄≥19岁、居住在加拿大且在过去12个月内购买过大麻的参与者。基础模型使用多项logit(MNL)模型,潜在类别分析用于评估偏好亚组。主要局限性包括顺序效应、假设偏差和框架效应。
1626人完成了调查,基础模型显示客户服务在购买决策中权重最大,其次是距离以及销售和折扣的可用性。偏好模式存在相当大的异质性,五组潜在类别模型显示拟合度最佳。只有一组(样本的15%)高度重视受省级监管的商店,而三组愿意在监管方面做出权衡以获得更好的客户服务、产品信息或更近的距离。一组更喜欢不受监管的来源(样本的24%);该组也主要受销售和折扣可用性的驱动。三组(样本的60.5%)更喜欢在线商店。
本研究强调,消费者体验对大麻购买行为的影响存在显著差异。修改大麻零售法规,重点改善产品信息获取以及审查销售和折扣限制,可能对将客户转向持牌零售商产生最大影响。