Elepaño Anton, Villafuerte Andrew Rufino, Besa John Jefferson, Arenos Carl Lawrence, Castillo Ron Michael, Palileo-Villanueva Lia
Department of Medicine, University of the Philippines-Philippine General Hospital, Manila, Philippines.
Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, University of the Philippines, Manila, Philippines.
J Educ Health Promot. 2023 Nov 27;12:382. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_534_23. eCollection 2023.
During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, medical schools in the Philippines accelerated the adoption of virtual learning. Course developers were challenged to provide equal opportunities for clinical exposure given the differential access of students to technology. This study describes the modifications in the course design of an internal medicine rotation for third-year medical students and the perceptions of the faculty and students toward these changes.
Course evaluations by students and faculty were reviewed. Using a concurrent mixed-methods approach, we analyzed the quantitative and qualitative responses and triangulated the results of the faculty and student surveys.
Shifting to a virtual learning platform decreased the number of student-patient interactions. Observing a telemedicine consultation done by faculty substituted for real patient encounters. In consideration of students with limited Internet access, synchronous activities were made nongraded. The survey response rate was 51% (93/181) for students and 34% (32/94) for faculty. Survey participants indicated high overall satisfaction toward the virtual course with a general agreement between students and faculty respondents in most domains. Recurrent themes were the demand for more patient encounters, more synchronous activities, and better evaluation tools. Only the faculty were critical of technical issues, such as audibility and Internet connectivity.
The experiences of a single institution in redesigning and implementing an undergraduate medical course in internal medicine for a fully virtual platform were described. Strategies for augmenting patient exposure and tailored clinical assessment tools are needed to improve stakeholder satisfaction. In resource-limited settings, access to appropriate technology must be considered to ensure equitable learning.
在2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行期间,菲律宾的医学院加速采用了虚拟学习。鉴于学生获取技术的机会存在差异,课程开发者面临着为临床实践提供平等机会的挑战。本研究描述了针对三年级医学生的内科轮转课程设计的修改,以及教师和学生对这些变化的看法。
回顾了学生和教师的课程评估。采用同步混合方法,我们分析了定量和定性的回答,并对教师和学生调查的结果进行了三角测量。
转向虚拟学习平台减少了学生与患者的互动次数。观察教师进行的远程医疗咨询取代了实际的患者接触。考虑到互联网接入有限的学生,同步活动改为非评分活动。学生的调查回复率为51%(93/181),教师的调查回复率为34%(32/94)。调查参与者对虚拟课程总体满意度较高,学生和教师受访者在大多数领域普遍达成一致。反复出现的主题是需要更多的患者接触、更多的同步活动和更好的评估工具。只有教师对诸如可听性和互联网连接等技术问题提出了批评。
描述了一所机构在为全虚拟平台重新设计和实施本科内科医学课程方面的经验。需要增加患者接触的策略和量身定制的临床评估工具,以提高利益相关者的满意度。在资源有限的环境中,必须考虑获取适当技术以确保公平学习。