Schran H F
Clin Ther. 1985;8(1):71-5.
Bioavailability of two formulations of ergoloid mesylates was compared in 18 healthy men. In a randomized, crossover design, each subject received a single oral dose of six liquid capsules and six oral tablets, each capsule or tablet containing 1 mg of the active ingredient. A one-week washout period intervened between the two doses. Blood samples were drawn at intervals up to ten hours after drug ingestion and were assayed for plasma concentrations of ergoloid mesylates by a specific radioimmunoassay. The liquid capsule produced mean peak concentrations and areas under the curve (AUC) that were about 12% higher than those produced by the oral tablet; these differences were statistically significant (P less than 0.05). No statistically significant differences were observed for the other pharmacokinetic parameters, namely, time to peak concentration, apparent rate constants for absorption and elimination, and lag time. As the differences in peak concentration and AUC were less than 20%, even though they were statistically significant, the two formulations were considered bioequivalent according to FDA guidelines for bioequivalence. The therapeutic benefit that might derive from greater bioavailability of the liquid capsule has not been established.
在18名健康男性中比较了两种甲磺酸麦角硫因制剂的生物利用度。采用随机交叉设计,每位受试者单次口服6粒软胶囊和6片口服片剂,每粒胶囊或片剂均含有1毫克活性成分。两次给药之间有一周的洗脱期。在服药后长达10小时的间隔时间采集血样,并通过特定的放射免疫分析法测定血浆中甲磺酸麦角硫因的浓度。软胶囊产生的平均峰值浓度和曲线下面积(AUC)比口服片剂产生的约高12%;这些差异具有统计学意义(P小于0.05)。在其他药代动力学参数方面未观察到统计学显著差异,即达峰时间、吸收和消除的表观速率常数以及滞后时间。由于峰值浓度和AUC的差异小于20%,尽管具有统计学意义,但根据美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)的生物等效性指南,这两种制剂被认为具有生物等效性。软胶囊更高的生物利用度可能带来的治疗益处尚未得到证实。