Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, West China School of Public Health and West China Fourth Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 16 People's South Road, Chengdu 610041, China.
Health Policy Plan. 2024 Apr 10;39(4):363-371. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czae008.
Low-fertility rate has been a common problem in many industrialized countries. To reverse the declining trend of new births, Chinese government gradually lifted its restrictions on the number of births per family, allowing for a household to have no more than two children. Little is known about the additional births or population increase contributed by the gradual relaxation of birth restrictions. To fill this gap, this quasi-experimental design study including data from 124 regions used the synthetic control method and controlled interrupted time series analysis to evaluate the differences in birth rates and rates of natural population increase between China and its synthetic control following implementation of the two-child policy from 2011 to 2020. A total of 123 regions were included in the control pool. Data collected during 1990-2010 were used to identify the synthetic China for each study outcome. The mean rate differences of birth rates and rates of natural increase between China and synthetic China after two-child policy implementation were 1.16 per 1000 population and 1.02 per 1000, respectively. These rate differences were distinguished from variation due to chance (one-sided pseudo-P-values: P for birth rates = 0.047, P for rates of natural increase = 0.020). However, there were statistically significant annual reductions in the pre-post trend of birth rates and rates of natural increase compared with those of controls of <0.340 per 1000 population per year [P = 0.007, 95% CI = (-0.584, -0.096)] and <0.274 per 1000 per year [P = 0.028, 95% CI = (-0.518, -0.031)]. The results suggested that lifting birth restrictions had a short-term effect on the increase in birth rates and rates of natural population increase. However, birth policy with lifting birth restrictions alone may not have sustained impact on population growth in the long run.
低生育率一直是许多工业化国家的共同问题。为了扭转新生人口数量下降的趋势,中国政府逐渐放宽了对家庭生育数量的限制,允许每个家庭生育不超过两个孩子。对于逐步放宽生育限制所带来的额外生育或人口增长,人们知之甚少。为了填补这一空白,本项准实验设计研究利用合成控制法和控制中断时间序列分析,结合 124 个地区的数据,评估了 2011 年至 2020 年实施二孩政策前后中国及其合成控制地区的出生率和自然人口增长率的差异。共有 123 个地区被纳入对照组。每个研究结果的合成中国数据收集自 1990-2010 年。二孩政策实施后,中国与合成中国的出生率和自然增长率差异的平均率分别为每 1000 人增加 1.16 和 1.02。这些差异与随机变异有区别(单侧伪 P 值:出生率为 P=0.047,自然增长率为 P=0.020)。然而,与对照组相比,出生率和自然增长率的预-后趋势呈每年显著下降趋势,每年下降幅度均低于 0.340/1000 人[P=0.007,95%CI=(-0.584,-0.096)]和 0.274/1000 人[P=0.028,95%CI=(-0.518,-0.031)]。结果表明,放宽生育限制短期内对出生率和自然人口增长率的增加有影响。然而,仅放宽生育限制的生育政策从长期来看可能对人口增长没有持续影响。