• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

英格兰、芬兰和荷兰的产前保健政策差异:框架分析。

Differences in Antenatal Care Policies in England, Finland, and the Netherlands: A Framing analysis.

机构信息

Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.

出版信息

Matern Child Health J. 2024 Apr;28(4):738-745. doi: 10.1007/s10995-023-03882-3. Epub 2024 Feb 9.

DOI:10.1007/s10995-023-03882-3
PMID:38334865
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10963453/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The World Health Organization (WHO) states that good quality antenatal care should strive for both mother and child achieving their best possible health. On a policy level, in Europe these goals are reached with varying approaches. This research offers a fresh look on the underlying assumptions embedded in the ANC policies in three European countries.

METHODS

A framing analysis was conducted to publicly available ANC policies on uncomplicated pregnancies in Finland, England, and the Netherlands. Analysis was guided by van Hulst and Yanowa and included the following phases: a) Sense-making, b) Selecting, naming, and categorizing and c) Storytelling.

MAIN FINDINGS

Findings of this study demonstrate how ANC is organized with distinct frames. The Finnish ANC policies emphasized equity in care and instead of focusing on women, the ANC focused on the family. In England the pregnant woman was central, and it is seen as her responsibility to understand the ANC protocols. The ANC in the Netherlands focused on the pregnant woman's pregnancy experience and freedom.

CONCLUSION

The three studied countries had individual priorities and values guiding ANC provision. Despite each country being in line with the WHO ANC recommendations, areas requiring improvement should not be overlooked.

摘要

背景与目的

世界卫生组织(WHO)指出,优质的产前护理应努力使母婴双方都达到最佳健康状态。在政策层面上,欧洲各国采取了不同的方法来实现这些目标。本研究从全新视角审视了芬兰、英国和荷兰三国产前护理政策中所隐含的基本假设。

方法

本研究采用框架分析方法,对芬兰、英国和荷兰三国针对无并发症妊娠的公开产前护理政策进行分析。分析以 van Hulst 和 Yanowa 的方法为指导,包括以下三个阶段:a)理解意义,b)选择、命名和分类,c)讲述故事。

主要发现

本研究结果表明,产前护理是如何通过不同的框架来组织的。芬兰的产前护理政策强调护理中的公平性,而不是将重点放在妇女身上,而是将产前护理的重点放在家庭上。在英国,孕妇是核心,她有责任理解产前护理协议。荷兰的产前护理重点是孕妇的妊娠体验和自由。

结论

研究的三个国家在指导产前护理服务提供方面有各自的优先事项和价值观。尽管每个国家都符合世界卫生组织的产前护理建议,但仍不应忽视需要改进的领域。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d357/10963453/057b47b71baa/10995_2023_3882_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d357/10963453/057b47b71baa/10995_2023_3882_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d357/10963453/057b47b71baa/10995_2023_3882_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Differences in Antenatal Care Policies in England, Finland, and the Netherlands: A Framing analysis.英格兰、芬兰和荷兰的产前保健政策差异:框架分析。
Matern Child Health J. 2024 Apr;28(4):738-745. doi: 10.1007/s10995-023-03882-3. Epub 2024 Feb 9.
2
Provision and uptake of routine antenatal services: a qualitative evidence synthesis.常规产前服务的提供与接受情况:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jun 12;6(6):CD012392. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012392.pub2.
3
Effect of COVID-19 on antenatal care: experiences of medical professionals in the Netherlands.COVID-19 对产前保健的影响:荷兰医务人员的经验。
Reprod Health. 2023 Mar 8;20(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s12978-023-01587-y.
4
Factors for late initiation of antenatal care in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania: A qualitative study.坦桑尼亚达累斯萨拉姆地区产前保健开始较晚的因素:一项定性研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Nov 12;19(1):415. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2576-0.
5
Determinants of optimal antenatal care visit among pregnant women in Ethiopia: a multilevel analysis of Ethiopian mini demographic health survey 2019 data.影响埃塞俄比亚孕妇接受最佳产前护理的因素:基于 2019 年埃塞俄比亚迷你人口与健康调查数据的多水平分析。
Reprod Health. 2022 Mar 5;19(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s12978-022-01365-2.
6
The effect of national antenatal care guidelines and provider training on obstetric danger sign counselling: a propensity score matching analysis of the 2014 Ethiopia service provision assessment plus survey.国家产前保健指南和提供者培训对产科危险信号咨询的影响:基于 2014 年埃塞俄比亚服务提供评估加调查的倾向评分匹配分析。
Reprod Health. 2022 Jun 6;19(1):132. doi: 10.1186/s12978-022-01442-6.
7
Timing of first antenatal care visits and number of items of antenatal care contents received and associated factors in Ethiopia: multilevel mixed effects analysis.在埃塞俄比亚,首次产前护理就诊时间、接受的产前护理内容项目数及其相关因素:多层次混合效应分析。
Reprod Health. 2021 Nov 17;18(1):233. doi: 10.1186/s12978-021-01275-9.
8
Spatial distribution and predictive factors of antenatal care in Burundi: A spatial and multilevel baseline analysis for the third burundian demographic and health survey.布隆迪产前保健的空间分布及影响因素:基于第三次布隆迪人口与健康调查的空间和多水平基线分析
PLoS One. 2023 Jan 17;18(1):e0272897. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272897. eCollection 2023.
9
Health system and community level interventions for improving antenatal care coverage and health outcomes.改善产前保健覆盖率和健康结局的卫生系统及社区层面干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Dec 1;2015(12):CD010994. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010994.pub2.
10
Antenatal care use in urban areas in two European countries: Predisposing, enabling and pregnancy-related determinants in Belgium and the Netherlands.两个欧洲国家城市地区的产前护理利用情况:比利时和荷兰的诱发因素、促成因素及与妊娠相关的决定因素
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Aug 2;16(a):337. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1478-3.

本文引用的文献

1
Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in Europe: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prevalence Studies.欧洲妊娠糖尿病:患病率研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021 Dec 9;12:691033. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.691033. eCollection 2021.
2
Routine ultrasound for fetal assessment before 24 weeks' gestation.24 周妊娠前常规胎儿评估超声检查。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Aug 26;8(8):CD014698. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014698.
3
Maternal health care utilization and the obstetric outcomes of undocumented women in Finland - a retrospective register-based study.
芬兰无证女性的孕产妇保健利用情况及产科结局——一项基于登记数据的回顾性研究
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Mar 6;21(1):191. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-03642-7.
4
Implementation of the new WHO antenatal care model for a positive pregnancy experience: a monitoring framework.实施新的世界卫生组织产前护理模式以获得积极的妊娠体验:监测框架。
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Jun;5(6). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002605.
5
Are socioeconomic inequalities in the incidence of small-for-gestational-age birth narrowing? Findings from a population-based cohort in the South of England.小于胎龄儿出生发生率中的社会经济不平等现象正在缩小吗?来自英格兰南部一项基于人群的队列研究的结果。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jul 29;9(7):e026998. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026998.
6
Perinatal health monitoring through a European lens: eight lessons from the Euro-Peristat report on 2015 births.从欧洲视角看围产期健康监测:欧洲围产期统计2015年出生情况报告的八点启示
BJOG. 2019 Dec;126(13):1518-1522. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15857. Epub 2019 Jul 18.
7
A guide to policy analysis as a research method.作为一种研究方法的政策分析指南。
Health Promot Int. 2019 Oct 1;34(5):1032-1044. doi: 10.1093/heapro/day052.
8
A global view of severe maternal morbidity: moving beyond maternal mortality.全球视野下的严重孕产妇发病率:超越孕产妇死亡率。
Reprod Health. 2018 Jun 22;15(Suppl 1):98. doi: 10.1186/s12978-018-0527-2.
9
Quality maternity care for every woman, everywhere: a call to action.为全球各地的每位妇女提供优质的孕产妇保健:行动呼吁。
Lancet. 2016 Nov 5;388(10057):2307-2320. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31333-2. Epub 2016 Sep 16.
10
Analysis of policy towards improvement of perinatal mortality in the Netherlands (2004-2011).荷兰围产期死亡率改善政策分析(2004 - 2011年)
Soc Sci Med. 2016 May;157:156-64. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.01.032. Epub 2016 Jan 23.