Suppr超能文献

感音神经性听力损失中的频率跟随反应:一项系统综述

Frequency-Following Responses in Sensorineural Hearing Loss: A Systematic Review.

作者信息

Jacxsens Laura, Biot Lana, Escera Carles, Gilles Annick, Cardon Emilie, Van Rompaey Vincent, De Hertogh Willem, Lammers Marc J W

机构信息

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital (UZA), Drie Eikenstraat 655, 2650, Edegem, Belgium.

Resonant Labs Antwerp, Department of Translational Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.

出版信息

J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2024 Apr;25(2):131-147. doi: 10.1007/s10162-024-00932-7. Epub 2024 Feb 9.

Abstract

PURPOSE

This systematic review aims to assess the impact of sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) on various frequency-following response (FFR) parameters.

METHODS

Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic review was conducted using PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases up to January 2023. Studies evaluating FFRs in patients with SNHL and normal hearing controls were included.

RESULTS

Sixteen case-control studies were included, revealing variability in acquisition parameters. In the time domain, patients with SNHL exhibited prolonged latencies. The specific waves that were prolonged differed across studies. There was no consensus regarding wave amplitude in the time domain. In the frequency domain, focusing on studies that elicited FFRs with stimuli of 170 ms or longer, participants with SNHL displayed a significantly smaller fundamental frequency (F). Results regarding changes in the temporal fine structure (TFS) were inconsistent.

CONCLUSION

Patients with SNHL may require more time for processing (speech) stimuli, reflected in prolonged latencies. However, the exact timing of this delay remains unclear. Additionally, when presenting longer stimuli (≥ 170 ms), patients with SNHL show difficulties tracking the F of (speech) stimuli. No definite conclusions could be drawn on changes in wave amplitude in the time domain and the TFS in the frequency domain. Patient characteristics, acquisition parameters, and FFR outcome parameters differed greatly across studies. Future studies should be performed in larger and carefully matched subject groups, using longer stimuli presented at the same intensity in dB HL for both groups, or at a carefully determined maximum comfortable loudness level.

摘要

目的

本系统评价旨在评估感音神经性听力损失(SNHL)对各种频率跟随反应(FFR)参数的影响。

方法

遵循PRISMA指南,截至2023年1月,使用PubMed、科学网和Scopus数据库进行了系统评价。纳入了评估SNHL患者和听力正常对照者FFR的研究。

结果

纳入了16项病例对照研究,结果显示采集参数存在差异。在时域中,SNHL患者的潜伏期延长。不同研究中延长的具体波不同。关于时域中的波幅没有达成共识。在频域中,聚焦于使用170毫秒或更长时间刺激诱发FFR的研究,SNHL参与者的基频(F)明显较小。关于时间精细结构(TFS)变化的结果不一致。

结论

SNHL患者可能需要更多时间来处理(言语)刺激,这表现为潜伏期延长。然而,这种延迟的确切时间尚不清楚。此外,当呈现较长刺激(≥170毫秒)时,SNHL患者在跟踪(言语)刺激的F方面存在困难。关于时域中的波幅变化和频域中的TFS变化,无法得出明确结论。不同研究中的患者特征、采集参数和FFR结果参数差异很大。未来的研究应在更大且匹配良好的受试者群体中进行,两组均使用相同强度(dB HL)或精心确定的最大舒适响度水平呈现更长的刺激。

相似文献

6
Human Frequency Following Responses to Vocoded Speech.人类对语音编码语音的频率跟随反应。
Ear Hear. 2017 Sep/Oct;38(5):e256-e267. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000432.
8
Human Frequency Following Responses to Filtered Speech.人类对滤波语音的频率跟随反应。
Ear Hear. 2021 Jan/Feb;42(1):87-105. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000902.

本文引用的文献

1
Frequency Following Responses to Tone Glides: Effects of Age and Hearing Loss.频率跟随音渡反应:年龄和听力损失的影响。
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2023 Aug;24(4):429-439. doi: 10.1007/s10162-023-00900-7. Epub 2023 Jul 12.
8
The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
PLoS Med. 2021 Mar 29;18(3):e1003583. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003583. eCollection 2021 Mar.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验