Jacxsens Laura, Biot Lana, Escera Carles, Gilles Annick, Cardon Emilie, Van Rompaey Vincent, De Hertogh Willem, Lammers Marc J W
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital (UZA), Drie Eikenstraat 655, 2650, Edegem, Belgium.
Resonant Labs Antwerp, Department of Translational Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2024 Apr;25(2):131-147. doi: 10.1007/s10162-024-00932-7. Epub 2024 Feb 9.
This systematic review aims to assess the impact of sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) on various frequency-following response (FFR) parameters.
Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic review was conducted using PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases up to January 2023. Studies evaluating FFRs in patients with SNHL and normal hearing controls were included.
Sixteen case-control studies were included, revealing variability in acquisition parameters. In the time domain, patients with SNHL exhibited prolonged latencies. The specific waves that were prolonged differed across studies. There was no consensus regarding wave amplitude in the time domain. In the frequency domain, focusing on studies that elicited FFRs with stimuli of 170 ms or longer, participants with SNHL displayed a significantly smaller fundamental frequency (F). Results regarding changes in the temporal fine structure (TFS) were inconsistent.
Patients with SNHL may require more time for processing (speech) stimuli, reflected in prolonged latencies. However, the exact timing of this delay remains unclear. Additionally, when presenting longer stimuli (≥ 170 ms), patients with SNHL show difficulties tracking the F of (speech) stimuli. No definite conclusions could be drawn on changes in wave amplitude in the time domain and the TFS in the frequency domain. Patient characteristics, acquisition parameters, and FFR outcome parameters differed greatly across studies. Future studies should be performed in larger and carefully matched subject groups, using longer stimuli presented at the same intensity in dB HL for both groups, or at a carefully determined maximum comfortable loudness level.
本系统评价旨在评估感音神经性听力损失(SNHL)对各种频率跟随反应(FFR)参数的影响。
遵循PRISMA指南,截至2023年1月,使用PubMed、科学网和Scopus数据库进行了系统评价。纳入了评估SNHL患者和听力正常对照者FFR的研究。
纳入了16项病例对照研究,结果显示采集参数存在差异。在时域中,SNHL患者的潜伏期延长。不同研究中延长的具体波不同。关于时域中的波幅没有达成共识。在频域中,聚焦于使用170毫秒或更长时间刺激诱发FFR的研究,SNHL参与者的基频(F)明显较小。关于时间精细结构(TFS)变化的结果不一致。
SNHL患者可能需要更多时间来处理(言语)刺激,这表现为潜伏期延长。然而,这种延迟的确切时间尚不清楚。此外,当呈现较长刺激(≥170毫秒)时,SNHL患者在跟踪(言语)刺激的F方面存在困难。关于时域中的波幅变化和频域中的TFS变化,无法得出明确结论。不同研究中的患者特征、采集参数和FFR结果参数差异很大。未来的研究应在更大且匹配良好的受试者群体中进行,两组均使用相同强度(dB HL)或精心确定的最大舒适响度水平呈现更长的刺激。