Moyaert Julie, Gommeren Hanne, Mertens Griet, Lammers Marc J W, Vanderveken Olivier, Janssens de Varebeke Sebastien, Verhaert Nicolas, Denys Sam, van de Berg Raymond, Pennings Ronald, Fransen Erik, Van Rompaey Vincent, Gilles Annick, Moyaert Julie
Department of Translational Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Department of Otorhinolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium.
Audiol Neurootol. 2025;30(4):297-311. doi: 10.1159/000543263. Epub 2025 Jan 24.
Background and Aim: The primary concern among adults with regard to their hearing is the difficulty in comprehending speech, particularly in noisy environments. The constant need to listen attentively leads to heightened frustration, fatigue, and decreased concentration. According to research, high-frequency hearing loss could have negative implications on speech perception and make it even harder to communicate. In this study, the focus is on patients with DFNA9 as it is one of the most common forms of non-syndromic high-frequency hearing loss. These patients carry the p.Pro51Ser variant in the COCH gene, which leads to progressive decline of hearing and vestibular function. Despite various cross-sectional studies on the natural progression of hearing levels, speech perception in silence and noisy surroundings is largely unexplored in this group of patients.
For the longitudinal analysis of speech perception, 101 heterozygous carriers of the p.Pro51Ser variant in the COCH gene were enrolled. In addition, a control group composed of individuals with normal hearing, who matched the patients with DFNA9 in the study in terms of age and sex, was recruited. All patients underwent pure-tone audiometry, speech perception in quiet (SPIQ), and speech perception in noise (SPIN).
The SPIQ outcomes reveal a mean speech reception threshold (SRT) of 28.18 dB SPL for male carriers and 29.29 dB SPL for female carriers in the youngest age-group (18-29 years). With increasing age, a steep decrease was noticed, and no speech discrimination ability in quiet remained for carriers in their seventh decade. Differences between carriers and control participants seem evident in the third decade of life and become more pronounced in the decades that follow. The SPIN displayed a similar trend, varying from -5 dB SNR in the youngest age-group, to no speech-in-noise thresholds in patients above the age of 60 years. In contrast, the matched group exhibited a SRT range from -5.5 to -3.25 dB SNR for males, and from -6.23 to -4.58 dB SNR for females from the second/third to the seventh decade. This stands in contrast to the DFNA9 population, where male carriers reach values of -5.18 dB SNR and female carriers reach -3.12 dB SNR as early as in the fourth decade.
This study indicates poor performance on speech understanding in quiet and noise in DFNA9 patients in comparison with the group with normal hearing, even at a young age. Therefore, future research should not only investigate pure-tone audiometry, but also speech perception. Moreover, reimbursing hearing aids based on speech-in-noise testing could prove to be more advantageous than based on pure-tone audiometry.
.背景与目的:成年人对听力的主要担忧在于理解言语困难,尤其是在嘈杂环境中。持续需要专心聆听会导致愈发沮丧、疲劳以及注意力下降。根据研究,高频听力损失可能对言语感知产生负面影响,使交流变得更加困难。在本研究中,重点关注DFNA9患者,因为它是最常见的非综合征性高频听力损失形式之一。这些患者携带COCH基因中的p.Pro51Ser变体,这会导致听力和前庭功能逐渐衰退。尽管对听力水平的自然进展进行了各种横断面研究,但在这组患者中,安静和嘈杂环境下的言语感知情况在很大程度上尚未得到探索。
为了对言语感知进行纵向分析,招募了101名COCH基因p.Pro51Ser变体的杂合携带者。此外,招募了一个听力正常的对照组,其年龄和性别与研究中的DFNA9患者相匹配。所有患者均接受纯音听力测定、安静环境下的言语感知(SPIQ)以及噪声环境下的言语感知(SPIN)测试。
SPIQ结果显示,最年轻年龄组(18 - 29岁)中,男性携带者的平均言语接受阈值(SRT)为28.18 dB SPL,女性携带者为29.29 dB SPL。随着年龄增长,发现阈值急剧下降,到第七个十年时,携带者在安静环境下已无言语辨别能力。携带者与对照参与者之间的差异在第三个十年似乎就很明显,并在随后的几十年中变得更加显著。SPIN呈现出类似趋势,最年轻年龄组的信噪比为 -5 dB SNR,60岁以上患者则没有噪声环境下的言语阈值。相比之下,匹配组从第二个/第三个十年到第七个十年,男性的SRT范围为 -5.5至 -3.25 dB SNR,女性为 -6.23至 -4.58 dB SNR。这与DFNA9人群形成对比,在DFNA9人群中,男性携带者早在第四个十年时信噪比就达到 -5.18 dB SNR,女性携带者达到 -3.12 dB SNR。
本研究表明,与听力正常的人群相比,即使在年轻时,DFNA9患者在安静和噪声环境下的言语理解能力也较差。因此,未来的研究不仅应调查纯音听力测定,还应研究言语感知。此外,基于噪声环境下言语测试报销助听器可能比基于纯音听力测定更具优势。