Suppr超能文献

指导方法是否会影响书写痉挛患者肉毒毒素的剂量?

Does the guidance method affect the doses of botulinum toxin in writer's cramp?

机构信息

CHU de Lille, Movement Disorders Department, 59000 Lille, France.

Université de Lille, CHU de Lille, U2694 METRICS, 59000 Lille, France.

出版信息

Rev Neurol (Paris). 2024 Jun;180(6):548-558. doi: 10.1016/j.neurol.2023.11.009. Epub 2024 Feb 8.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) injections are the main medical treatment of writer's cramp. When the outcome is favourable, patients usually receive injections several times per year in the long-term. However, we know little about the course of BoNT doses and nothing about the impact of the guidance method on the clinical outcome or injection strategy.

METHODS

We studied, in the long-term, the doses of BoNT and the target muscles in a group of patients with writer's cramp, according to the guidance method (electrical stimulation or ultrasound). Patients received at least three injection cycles guided by electrical stimulation, followed by at least three injection cycles guided by ultrasound.

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients were included. More target muscles were injected after switching to ultrasound guidance, especially the flexor carpi ulnaris and the flexor carpi radialis. The mean dose by muscle was lower when ultrasound guidance was used. When using electrical stimulation guidance, the dose in the flexors of the fingers decreased in the long-term, but increased in the flexors of the wrist. The course of the BoNT doses and of the number of target muscles per cycle were not the same during the first period (electrical stimulation) and the second period (ultrasound).

CONCLUSIONS

Switching to ultrasound guidance, the BoNT dose decreased, mainly in the flexors of the wrist. Based on the results of our study, we suggest a starting dose in several muscles (flexor carpi ulnaris, flexor carpi radialis, flexor digitorum profundus and flexor pollicis longus).

摘要

目的

肉毒毒素(BoNT)注射是治疗书写痉挛的主要医学手段。当治疗效果良好时,患者通常会在长期内每年接受数次注射。然而,我们对 BoNT 剂量的过程知之甚少,也不知道指导方法对临床结果或注射策略的影响。

方法

我们根据指导方法(电刺激或超声),对一组书写痉挛患者进行了长期的 BoNT 剂量和目标肌肉研究。患者接受了至少三个电刺激引导的注射周期,然后至少接受了三个超声引导的注射周期。

结果

共纳入 24 名患者。切换到超声引导后,注射的目标肌肉更多,尤其是尺侧腕屈肌和桡侧腕屈肌。使用超声引导时,肌肉的平均剂量较低。使用电刺激引导时,手指屈肌的剂量在长期内下降,但腕部屈肌的剂量增加。BoNT 剂量和每个周期的目标肌肉数量在第一个周期(电刺激)和第二个周期(超声)期间并不相同。

结论

切换到超声引导后,BoNT 剂量减少,主要是腕部屈肌的剂量减少。基于我们的研究结果,我们建议在多个肌肉(尺侧腕屈肌、桡侧腕屈肌、指深屈肌和拇指长屈肌)中使用起始剂量。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验