Suppr超能文献

用于创建肱动脉-贵要静脉动静脉内瘘的贵要静脉隧道转位术与抬高转位术:一项系统评价和荟萃分析

Basilic vein tunnel transposition versus elevation transposition for brachiobasilic arteriovenous fistula creation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Koudounas Georgios, Giannopoulos Stefanos, Houser Alex, Karkos Christos, Volteas Panagiotis, Virvilis Dimitrios

机构信息

Vascular Unit, 5th Department of Surgery, Aristotle University Medical School, Hippokratio Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece.

Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, NY, USA.

出版信息

J Vasc Access. 2025 Jan;26(1):22-29. doi: 10.1177/11297298241226993. Epub 2024 Feb 9.

Abstract

This study aimed to compare basilic vein tunnel transposition (BVTT) to basilic vein elevation transposition (BVET) technique for superficialization of a basilic arteriovenous fistula. This is a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing outcomes between BVTT and BVET for brachiobasilic arteriovenous fistula (AVF) creation. Primary endpoints were primary patency at several time intervals during follow-up and postoperative local complications, whereas secondary endpoints included primary assisted patency and secondary patency. A random effects model meta-analysis was conducted, and the statistic was used to assess heterogeneity. Nine eligible studies were identified, including 543 patients (247 in the BVTT group and 296 in the BVET group). BVTT group was associated with inferior primary patency rate at 6 months compared to BVET group (three studies; OR: 0.43; 95% CI: 0.22-0.83;  = 0%;  = 0.012). However, primary patency rates were similar between the two study groups at 12 months (six studies; OR: 0.64; 95% CI: 0.33-1.22;  = 40.7%;  = 0.176), and at 24 months (six studies; OR: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.32-2.29;  = 74.9%;  = 0.764). No significant differences in terms of primary assisted patency, secondary patency, and postoperative complications were detected between the groups. More specifically, wound infection (BVTT:  = 9/150; BVET:  = 6/186; OR: 1.39; 95% CI: 0.48-4.06;  = 0%;  = 0.542) and healing of the scar, particularly regarding arm edema (BVTT:  = 18/100; BVET:  = 27/165; OR: 1.11; 95% CI: 0.57-2.18;  = 0%;  = 0.755) and hematoma formation (BVTT:  = 14/173; BVET:  = 42/209; OR: 0.40; 95% CI: 0.13-1.19;  = 49%;  = 0.101), did not differ significantly between the two study groups. BVET achieved superior primary patency at 6 months compared to BVTT, but this benefit seems to be lost during longer follow-up intervals. Therefore, both surgical techniques provide similar long-term outcomes.

摘要

本研究旨在比较贵要静脉隧道转位术(BVTT)与贵要静脉抬高转位术(BVET)在贵要动静脉内瘘浅表化中的应用。这是一项系统评价和荟萃分析,比较了BVTT和BVET在创建肱贵要动静脉内瘘(AVF)时的效果。主要终点是随访期间几个时间点的初级通畅率和术后局部并发症,而次要终点包括初级辅助通畅率和次级通畅率。进行了随机效应模型荟萃分析,并使用统计量评估异质性。共纳入9项符合条件的研究,包括543例患者(BVTT组247例,BVET组296例)。与BVET组相比,BVTT组在6个月时的初级通畅率较低(3项研究;OR:0.43;95%CI:0.22 - 0.83; = 0%; = 0.012)。然而,两组在12个月时的初级通畅率相似(6项研究;OR:0.64;95%CI:0.33 - 1.22; = 40.7%; = 0.176),在24个月时也相似(6项研究;OR:0.86;95%CI:0.32 - 2.29; = 74.9%; = 0.764)。两组在初级辅助通畅率、次级通畅率和术后并发症方面未检测到显著差异。更具体地说,伤口感染(BVTT: = 9/150;BVET: = 6/186;OR:1.39;95%CI:0.48 - 4.06; = 0%; = 0.542)以及瘢痕愈合,特别是关于手臂水肿(BVTT: = 18/100;BVET: = 27/165;OR:1.11;95%CI:0.57 - 2.18; = 0%; = 0.755)和血肿形成(BVTT: = 14/173;BVET: = 42/209;OR:0.40;95%CI:0.13 - 1.19; = 49%; = 0.101),两组之间无显著差异。与BVTT相比,BVET在6个月时实现了更高的初级通畅率,但在更长的随访期内这种优势似乎消失了。因此,两种手术技术提供了相似的长期效果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验