• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

剖宫产子宫裂伤与后续分娩中的早产:一项回顾性纵向随访队列研究

Cesarean Uterine Lacerations and Prematurity in the Following Delivery: A Retrospective Longitudinal Follow-Up Cohort Study.

作者信息

Reichman Orna, Hirsch Ayala, Fridman Shira, Grisaru-Granovsky Sorina, Helman Sarit

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Centre, Hebrew University, Jerusalem 91120, Israel.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2024 Jan 28;13(3):749. doi: 10.3390/jcm13030749.

DOI:10.3390/jcm13030749
PMID:38337443
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10856371/
Abstract

(1) : We aimed to investigate whether second-stage cesarean delivery (SSCD) had a higher occurrence of low-segment uterine incision extensions compared with cesarean delivery (CD) at other stages of labor and to study the association of these extensions with preterm birth (PTB). (2) : In this retrospective longitudinal follow-up cohort study, spanning from 2006 to 2019, all selected mothers who delivered by CD at first birth (P1) and returned for second birth (P2) were grouped by cesarean stage at P1: planned CD, first-stage CD, or SSCD. Mothers with a PTB at P1, multiple-gestation pregnancies in either P1 or P2 and those with prior abortions were excluded. (3) : The study included 1574 selected women who underwent a planned CD at P1 (n = 483 (30.7%)), first-stage CD (n = 878 (55.8%), and SSCD (n = 213 (13.5%)). There was a higher occurrence of low-segment uterine incision extensions among SSCD patients compared to first-stage CDs and planned CDs: 50/213 (23%), 56/878 (6.4%), and 5/483 (1%), respectively ( < 0.001). A multivariate logistic regression showed that women undergoing an SSCD are at risk for low-segment uterine incision extensions compared with women undergoing a planned CD, OR 28.8 (CI 11.2; 74.4). We observed no association between the occurrence of a low-segment uterine incisional extension at P1 and PTB ≤ 37 gestational weeks in the subsequent delivery, with rates of 6.3% (7/111) for those with an extension compared to 4.5% (67/1463) for those without an extension ( = 0.41). Notably, parturients experiencing a low-segment uterine incisional extension during their first childbirth were six times more likely to have a preterm delivery before 32 weeks of gestation compared to those without extensions, with two cases (1.8%) compared to four cases (0.3%), respectively. A similar trend was observed for preterm deliveries between 32 and 34 weeks of gestation, with those having extensions showing twice the prevalence of prematurity compared to those without, with a -value of 0.047. (4) : This study highlights that mothers undergoing SSCD experience higher prevalence of low uterine incision extensions compared to other CDs. To further ascertain whether the presence of these extensions is associated with preterm birth (PTB) in subsequent births, particularly early PTB before 34 weeks of gestation, larger-scale future studies are warranted.

摘要

(1):我们旨在研究与分娩其他阶段的剖宫产(CD)相比,二期剖宫产(SSCD)时下段子宫切口延长的发生率是否更高,并研究这些延长与早产(PTB)之间的关联。(2):在这项从2006年至2019年的回顾性纵向随访队列研究中,所有首次分娩行剖宫产(P1)且再次分娩(P2)的入选母亲按P1时的剖宫产阶段分组:计划剖宫产、一期剖宫产或二期剖宫产。排除P1时早产、P1或P2为多胎妊娠以及有既往流产史的母亲。(3):该研究纳入了1574名入选女性,她们在P1时接受了计划剖宫产(n = 483(30.7%))、一期剖宫产(n = 878(55.8%))和二期剖宫产(n = 213(13.5%))。与一期剖宫产和计划剖宫产患者相比,二期剖宫产患者下段子宫切口延长的发生率更高:分别为50/213(23%)、56/878(6.4%)和5/483(1%)(<0.001)。多因素逻辑回归显示,与接受计划剖宫产的女性相比,接受二期剖宫产的女性有下段子宫切口延长的风险,比值比为28.8(可信区间11.2;74.4)。我们观察到P1时下段子宫切口延长的发生与后续分娩中孕周≤37周的早产之间无关联,有延长者的发生率为6.3%(7/111),无延长者为4.5%(67/1463)(P = 0.41)。值得注意的是,与无延长者相比,首次分娩时经历下段子宫切口延长的产妇在妊娠32周前早产的可能性高6倍,分别为2例(1.8%)和4例(0.3%)。在妊娠32至34周之间的早产情况也观察到类似趋势,有延长者的早产患病率是无延长者的两倍,P值为0.047。(4):本研究强调,与其他剖宫产相比,接受二期剖宫产的母亲下段子宫切口延长的患病率更高。为了进一步确定这些延长的存在是否与后续分娩中的早产(尤其是妊娠34周前的早期早产)相关,未来需要进行更大规模的研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2467/10856371/2c1ec03c654e/jcm-13-00749-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2467/10856371/2c1ec03c654e/jcm-13-00749-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2467/10856371/2c1ec03c654e/jcm-13-00749-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Cesarean Uterine Lacerations and Prematurity in the Following Delivery: A Retrospective Longitudinal Follow-Up Cohort Study.剖宫产子宫裂伤与后续分娩中的早产:一项回顾性纵向随访队列研究
J Clin Med. 2024 Jan 28;13(3):749. doi: 10.3390/jcm13030749.
2
Impacted fetal head extraction methods at second stage cesarean and subsequent preterm delivery: A multicenter study.第二产程剖宫产胎头取出困难与随后早产的多中心研究。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2024 Aug;166(2):775-782. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.15383. Epub 2024 Jan 18.
3
The association between unintended hysterotomy extensions with cesarean delivery and subsequent preterm birth.剖宫产术中意外子宫切口延伸与早产的关系。
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2024 Apr;6(4):101326. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2024.101326. Epub 2024 Mar 5.
4
Risk factors for uterine incision extension during cesarean delivery.剖宫产术中子宫切口延长的危险因素。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022 Jun;35(11):2156-2161. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2020.1783230. Epub 2020 Jun 24.
5
Unintended uterine extension at the time of cesarean delivery - risk factors and associated adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes.剖宫产术中子宫意外延伸 - 危险因素及相关母婴不良结局。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2023 Dec;36(1):2204997. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2023.2204997.
6
Unintended Upper Uterine Wall Extensions at the Time of Cesarean Delivery: Risk Factors and Associated Adverse Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes.剖宫产时子宫前壁意外延伸:危险因素及相关的孕产妇和新生儿不良结局
Am J Perinatol. 2025 Apr;42(5):572-579. doi: 10.1055/a-2408-7813. Epub 2024 Sep 3.
7
Duration of first vaginal birth following cesarean: Is stage of labor at previous cesarean a factor?剖宫产术后首次阴道分娩的时长:前次剖宫产的产程阶段是一个因素吗?
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020 Sep;252:344-348. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.06.060. Epub 2020 Jun 29.
8
Induction of labor at second delivery subsequent to a primary cesarean: is stage of labor at previous cesarean a factor?二次剖宫产分娩的引产:上次剖宫产时的产程是否为一个影响因素?
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2021 Mar;303(3):659-663. doi: 10.1007/s00404-020-05776-z. Epub 2020 Sep 1.
9
T and J vertical extensions in low transverse cesarean births.低位横切口剖宫产术中的T形和J形垂直延长。
Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Feb;87(2):238-43. doi: 10.1016/0029-7844(95)00388-6.
10
Previous preterm cesarean delivery and risk of uterine rupture in subsequent trial of labor-a national cohort study.既往早产剖宫产史与后续引产时子宫破裂风险——一项全国性队列研究
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Apr;224(4):380.e1-380.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.09.040. Epub 2020 Sep 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Risk of Preterm Birth among Secundiparas with a Previous Cesarean due to a Failed Vacuum Delivery.既往因真空吸引分娩失败行剖宫产的经产妇发生早产的风险
J Clin Med. 2023 Nov 28;12(23):7358. doi: 10.3390/jcm12237358.
2
Management of Impacted Fetal Head at Caesarean Birth: Scientific Impact Paper No. 73.剖宫产术中胎头娩出困难的处理:科学影响论文第 73 号。
BJOG. 2023 Nov;130(12):e40-e64. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.17534. Epub 2023 Jun 12.
3
Second stage cesarean section and the risk of preterm birth in subsequent pregnancies.第二期剖宫产术与后续妊娠早产风险。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2022 Dec;159(3):783-789. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.14186. Epub 2022 Apr 6.
4
Full Dilatation Caesarean Section and the Risk of Preterm Delivery in a Subsequent Pregnancy: A Historical Cohort Study.完全扩张剖宫产与后续妊娠早产风险:一项历史性队列研究
J Clin Med. 2020 Dec 10;9(12):3998. doi: 10.3390/jcm9123998.
5
Caesarean birth and risk of subsequent preterm birth: a retrospective cohort study.剖宫产分娩与随后早产风险:一项回顾性队列研究。
BJOG. 2021 May;128(6):1020-1028. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16566. Epub 2020 Nov 4.
6
Does the length of second stage of labour or second stage caesarean section in nulliparous women increase the risk of preterm birth in subsequent pregnancies?初产妇第二产程的时长或剖宫产第二产程会增加其后续妊娠早产的风险吗?
J Perinat Med. 2020 Sep 14;49(2):159-165. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2020-0269. Print 2021 Feb 23.
7
Risk of preterm birth after prior term cesarean.先前足月剖宫产术后的早产风险。
BJOG. 2020 Apr;127(5):610-617. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16083. Epub 2020 Feb 24.
8
Risk of preterm birth in the subsequent pregnancy following caesarean section at full cervical dilatation compared with mid-cavity instrumental delivery.与经腹子宫中段器械助产分娩相比,宫颈完全扩张时剖宫产术后再次妊娠的早产风险。
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2020 Jun;60(3):382-388. doi: 10.1111/ajo.13058. Epub 2019 Sep 12.
9
Late-stage Cesarean section causes recurrent early preterm birth: how to tackle this problem?晚期剖宫产导致复发性早期早产:如何解决这个问题?
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Sep;54(3):293-296. doi: 10.1002/uog.20276.
10
Does previous caesarean section at full dilatation increase the likelihood of subsequent spontaneous preterm birth?足月时既往剖宫产会增加随后自然早产的可能性吗?
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018 Jun;58(3):267-273. doi: 10.1111/ajo.12713. Epub 2017 Sep 28.