Symeonidis Savvas, Mantzoros Ioannis, Anestiadou Elissavet, Ioannidis Orestis, Christidis Panagiotis, Bitsianis Stefanos, Zapsalis Konstantinos, Karastergiou Trigona, Athanasiou Dimitra, Apostolidis Stylianos, Angelopoulos Stamatios
4th Department of General Surgery, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, General Hospital of Thessaloniki "G. Papanikolaou", 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece.
1st Propaedeutic Department of Surgery, AHEPA University Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54636 Thessaloniki, Greece.
J Clin Med. 2024 Feb 1;13(3):864. doi: 10.3390/jcm13030864.
: Intraoperative biliary anatomy recognition is crucial for safety during laparoscopic cholecystectomy, since iatrogenic bile duct injuries represent a fatal complication, occurring in up to 0.9% of patients. Indocyanine green fluorescence cholangiography (ICG-FC) is a safe and cost-effective procedure for achieving a critical view of safety and recognizing early biliary injuries. The aim of this study is to compare the perioperative outcomes, usefulness and safety of standard intraoperative cholangiography (IOC) with ICG-FC with intravenous ICG. : Between 1 June 2021 and 31 December 2022, 160 patients undergoing elective LC were randomized into two equal groups: Group A (standard IOC) and group B (ICG-FC with intravenous ICG). : No significant difference was found between the two groups regarding demographics, surgery indication or surgery duration. No significant difference was found regarding the visualization of critical biliary structures. However, the surgeon satisfaction and cholangiography duration presented significant differences in favor of ICG-FC. Regarding the inflammatory response, a significant difference between the two groups was found only in postoperative WBC levels. Hepatic and renal function test results were not significantly different between the two groups on the first postoperative day, except for direct bilirubin. No statistically significant difference was noted regarding 30-day postoperative complications, while none of the complications noted included bile duct injury events. : ICG-FC presents equivalent results to IOC regarding extrahepatic biliary visualization and postoperative complications. However, more studies need to be performed in order to standardize the optimal dose, timing and mode of administration.
术中胆道解剖结构的识别对于腹腔镜胆囊切除术的安全性至关重要,因为医源性胆管损伤是一种致命的并发症,发生率高达0.9%的患者。吲哚菁绿荧光胆管造影术(ICG-FC)是一种安全且具有成本效益的方法,可实现安全的关键视野并识别早期胆管损伤。本研究的目的是比较标准术中胆管造影术(IOC)与静脉注射ICG的ICG-FC的围手术期结果、实用性和安全性。:在2021年6月1日至2022年12月31日期间,160例行择期LC的患者被随机分为两组:A组(标准IOC)和B组(静脉注射ICG的ICG-FC)。:两组在人口统计学、手术指征或手术持续时间方面没有显著差异。在关键胆管结构的可视化方面没有发现显著差异。然而,外科医生的满意度和胆管造影持续时间存在显著差异,有利于ICG-FC。关于炎症反应,两组之间仅在术后白细胞水平上存在显著差异。术后第一天,除直接胆红素外,两组的肝肾功能测试结果没有显著差异。术后30天并发症方面没有统计学上的显著差异,同时所记录的并发症均不包括胆管损伤事件。:在肝外胆管可视化和术后并发症方面,ICG-FC与IOC的结果相当。然而,需要进行更多的研究以规范最佳剂量、给药时间和给药方式。