• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

血管体靶向腘下血管成形术:对临床结局的影响——一项观察性研究

Angiosome-Targeted Infrapopliteal Angioplasty: Impact on Clinical Outcomes-An Observational Study.

作者信息

Popitiu Mircea Ionut, Alexandrescu Vlad Adrian, Clerici Giacomo, Ionac Stefan, Gavrila-Ardelean Gloria, Ion Miruna Georgiana, Ionac Mihai Edmond

机构信息

Research Center in Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, "Victor Babes" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania.

Cardio-Vascular and Thoracic Surgery Department, CHUp Sart-Tilman Hospital, University of Liège, 4000 Liège, Belgium.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2024 Feb 2;13(3):883. doi: 10.3390/jcm13030883.

DOI:10.3390/jcm13030883
PMID:38337576
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10856460/
Abstract

: Revascularization based on the angiosome concept (AC) is a controversial subject because there is currently no clear evidence of its efficacy, due to the heterogeneity of patients (multiple and diverse risk factors and comorbidities, multiple variations in the affected angiosomes). Choke vessels change the paradigm of the AC, and the presence or absence of the plantar arch directly affects the course of targeted revascularization. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of revascularization based on the AC in diabetic patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). This retrospective analysis included 51 patients (40 men, 11 women), with a mean age of 69 years (66-72) and a total of 51 limbs, who presented with Rutherford 5-6 CLTI, before and after having undergone a drug-coated balloon angioplasty (8 patients) or plain balloon angioplasty (43). Between November 2018 and November 2019, all patients underwent below-the-knee balloon angioplasties and were followed up for an average of 12 months. The alteration of microcirculation was compared between directly and indirectly revascularized angiosomes. The study assessed clinical findings and patient outcomes, with follow-up investigations, comparing wound healing rates between the different revascularization methods. Patient records and periprocedural leg digital subtraction angiographies (DSA) were analyzed. Differences in outcomes after direct revascularization and indirect percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTa) were examined using Cox proportional hazards analysis, with the following endpoints: ulcer healing, limb salvage, and also amputation-free survival. Direct blood flow to the angiosome supplying the ulcer area was achieved in 38 legs, in contrast to 13 legs with indirect revascularization. Among the cases, there were 39 lesions in the anterior tibial artery (ATA), 42 lesions in the posterior tibial artery (PTA), and 8 lesions in the peroneal artery (PA). According to a Cox proportional hazards analysis, having fewer than three (<3) affected angiosomes (HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.19-1.25, = 0.136) was associated with improved wound healing. Conversely, wound healing outcomes were least favorable after indirect angioplasty ( = 0.206). When adjusting the Cox proportional hazard analysis for the number of affected angiosomes, it was found that direct drug-coated angioplasty resulted in the most favorable wound healing ( = 0.091). At the 1-year follow-up, the major amputation rate was 17.7%, and, according to a Cox proportional hazards analysis, atrial fibrillation (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.42-1.69, = 0.637), hemodialysis (HR 1.26, 95% CI 0.39-4.04, = 0.699), and number of affected angiosomes > 3 (HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.63-1.39, = 0.748) were significantly associated with poor leg salvage. Additionally, direct endovascular revascularization was associated with a lower rate of major amputation compared to indirect angioplasty (HR 1.09, 95% CI 0.34-3.50, = 0.884). Observing the angiosomes concept in decision-making appears to result in improved rates of arterial ulcer healing and leg salvage, particularly in targeted drug-coated balloon angioplasty for diabetic critical limb ischemia, where multiple angiosomes are typically affected.

摘要

基于血管体概念(AC)的血运重建是一个有争议的话题,因为目前尚无明确证据证明其疗效,这是由于患者存在异质性(多种不同的风险因素和合并症,受累血管体存在多种变异)。窒息血管改变了AC的模式,足底弓的存在与否直接影响靶向血运重建的进程。本研究的目的是评估基于AC的血运重建对慢性肢体威胁性缺血(CLTI)糖尿病患者的影响。这项回顾性分析纳入了51例患者(40例男性,11例女性),平均年龄69岁(66 - 72岁),共51条肢体,这些患者在接受药物涂层球囊血管成形术(8例)或普通球囊血管成形术(43例)前后均表现为卢瑟福5 - 6级CLTI。在2018年11月至2019年11月期间,所有患者均接受了膝下球囊血管成形术,并平均随访12个月。比较了直接和间接血运重建血管体之间的微循环变化。该研究评估了临床发现和患者预后,并通过随访调查比较了不同血运重建方法之间的伤口愈合率。分析了患者记录和围手术期腿部数字减影血管造影(DSA)。使用Cox比例风险分析检查直接血运重建和间接经皮腔内血管成形术(PTa)后结局的差异,终点如下:溃疡愈合、肢体挽救以及无截肢生存率。38条腿实现了向供应溃疡区域的血管体的直接血流,相比之下,13条腿为间接血运重建。在这些病例中,胫前动脉(ATA)有39处病变,胫后动脉(PTA)有42处病变,腓动脉(PA)有8处病变。根据Cox比例风险分析,受累血管体少于三个(<3)(HR 0.49,95%CI 0.19 - 1.25,P = 0.136)与伤口愈合改善相关。相反,间接血管成形术后伤口愈合结局最不理想(P = 0.206)。在对受累血管体数量进行Cox比例风险分析调整后,发现直接药物涂层血管成形术导致最有利的伤口愈合(P = 0.091)。在1年随访时,大截肢率为17.7%,根据Cox比例风险分析,心房颤动(HR 0.85,95%CI 0.42 - 1.69,P = 0.637)、血液透析(HR 1.26,95%CI 0.39 - 4.04,P = 0.699)以及受累血管体数量>3(HR 0.94,95%CI 0.63 - 1.39,P = 0.748)与肢体挽救不佳显著相关。此外,与间接血管成形术相比,直接血管内血运重建与较低的大截肢率相关(HR 1.09, 95%CI 0.34 - 3.50, P = 0.884)。在决策过程中遵循血管体概念似乎能提高动脉溃疡愈合率和肢体挽救率,特别是在针对糖尿病严重肢体缺血的靶向药物涂层球囊血管成形术中,此时多个血管体通常会受累。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8253/10856460/9662a97cf646/jcm-13-00883-g023.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8253/10856460/e2f3ee58d831/jcm-13-00883-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8253/10856460/48e38cb1a1c8/jcm-13-00883-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8253/10856460/74382aceee80/jcm-13-00883-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8253/10856460/30624c979105/jcm-13-00883-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8253/10856460/db4d25238ce1/jcm-13-00883-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8253/10856460/423c769320ee/jcm-13-00883-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8253/10856460/02e64d686b57/jcm-13-00883-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8253/10856460/591bc95bb23c/jcm-13-00883-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8253/10856460/470c3b27e17b/jcm-13-00883-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8253/10856460/c6ffda24b3c6/jcm-13-00883-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8253/10856460/e9f3a818fddb/jcm-13-00883-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8253/10856460/4f995129ceea/jcm-13-00883-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8253/10856460/fc139b71ef92/jcm-13-00883-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8253/10856460/8387661e8e9f/jcm-13-00883-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8253/10856460/5d9e95eb3e34/jcm-13-00883-g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8253/10856460/1e1ce1406228/jcm-13-00883-g016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8253/10856460/0c99937539ac/jcm-13-00883-g017.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8253/10856460/04bbf91058b4/jcm-13-00883-g018.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8253/10856460/e555bb643162/jcm-13-00883-g019.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8253/10856460/354e38eba38b/jcm-13-00883-g020.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8253/10856460/5b943558ff18/jcm-13-00883-g021.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8253/10856460/b12ecde3b71e/jcm-13-00883-g022.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8253/10856460/9662a97cf646/jcm-13-00883-g023.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8253/10856460/e2f3ee58d831/jcm-13-00883-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8253/10856460/48e38cb1a1c8/jcm-13-00883-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8253/10856460/74382aceee80/jcm-13-00883-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8253/10856460/30624c979105/jcm-13-00883-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8253/10856460/db4d25238ce1/jcm-13-00883-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8253/10856460/423c769320ee/jcm-13-00883-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8253/10856460/02e64d686b57/jcm-13-00883-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8253/10856460/591bc95bb23c/jcm-13-00883-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8253/10856460/470c3b27e17b/jcm-13-00883-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8253/10856460/c6ffda24b3c6/jcm-13-00883-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8253/10856460/e9f3a818fddb/jcm-13-00883-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8253/10856460/4f995129ceea/jcm-13-00883-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8253/10856460/fc139b71ef92/jcm-13-00883-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8253/10856460/8387661e8e9f/jcm-13-00883-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8253/10856460/5d9e95eb3e34/jcm-13-00883-g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8253/10856460/1e1ce1406228/jcm-13-00883-g016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8253/10856460/0c99937539ac/jcm-13-00883-g017.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8253/10856460/04bbf91058b4/jcm-13-00883-g018.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8253/10856460/e555bb643162/jcm-13-00883-g019.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8253/10856460/354e38eba38b/jcm-13-00883-g020.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8253/10856460/5b943558ff18/jcm-13-00883-g021.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8253/10856460/b12ecde3b71e/jcm-13-00883-g022.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8253/10856460/9662a97cf646/jcm-13-00883-g023.jpg

相似文献

1
Angiosome-Targeted Infrapopliteal Angioplasty: Impact on Clinical Outcomes-An Observational Study.血管体靶向腘下血管成形术:对临床结局的影响——一项观察性研究
J Clin Med. 2024 Feb 2;13(3):883. doi: 10.3390/jcm13030883.
2
Angiosome Targeted PTA is More Important in Endovascular Revascularisation than in Surgical Revascularisation: Analysis of 545 Patients with Ischaemic Tissue Lesions.血管体靶向经皮腔内血管成形术在血管内血运重建中比在外科血运重建中更重要:对545例缺血性组织损伤患者的分析
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2017 Apr;53(4):567-575. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2017.01.008. Epub 2017 Feb 16.
3
Differential impact of bypass surgery and angioplasty on angiosome-targeted infrapopliteal revascularization.搭桥手术和血管成形术对血管区域靶向腘下血管重建的不同影响。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2015 Apr;49(4):412-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2014.12.023. Epub 2015 Mar 5.
4
Impact of angiosome- and nonangiosome-targeted peroneal bypass on limb salvage and healing in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia.血管体靶向和非血管体靶向腓动脉旁路移植术对慢性肢体威胁性缺血患者肢体挽救及愈合的影响
J Vasc Surg. 2017 Nov;66(5):1479-1487. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.04.074. Epub 2017 Jul 26.
5
Angiosome-targeted infrapopliteal endovascular revascularization for treatment of diabetic foot ulcers.血管生成靶向性治疗糖尿病足溃疡的腘动脉以下血管腔内再通术。
J Vasc Surg. 2013 Feb;57(2):427-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.07.057. Epub 2012 Dec 7.
6
Clinical outcome of angiosome-oriented infrapopliteal percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for isolated infrapopliteal lesions in patients with critical limb ischemia.以血管体为导向的腘下经皮腔内血管成形术治疗严重肢体缺血患者孤立性腘下病变的临床结果
Diagn Interv Radiol. 2016 Jan-Feb;22(1):52-8. doi: 10.5152/dir.2015.15129.
7
Evaluation of the Angiosome Concept Using Near-Infrared Fluorescence Imaging with Indocyanine Green.应用近红外荧光成像技术联合吲哚菁绿评估血管生成体概念。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2023 Jul;93:283-290. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2023.01.006. Epub 2023 Jan 13.
8
Long-term results of direct and indirect endovascular revascularization based on the angiosome concept in patients with critical limb ischemia presenting with isolated below-the-knee lesions.基于血管生成概念的直接和间接血管内血运重建治疗伴有孤立膝下病变的临界肢体缺血患者的长期结果。
J Vasc Surg. 2012 Feb;55(2):363-370.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.08.014. Epub 2011 Nov 1.
9
The impact of an angiosome-targeted revascularization on healing rate, limb salvage and survival in critical limb threatening ischemia.血管生成靶向再血管化对严重肢体缺血威胁肢体愈合率、保肢率和生存率的影响。
Acta Chir Belg. 2022 Apr;122(2):107-115. doi: 10.1080/00015458.2021.1881337. Epub 2021 Jun 21.
10
Evaluation of angiosome-targeted infrapopliteal endovascular revascularization in critical diabetic limb ischemia.评估血管区域靶向的腘下腔内血管重建术治疗糖尿病足严重肢体缺血的效果
J Interv Med. 2019 Apr 30;1(3):176-181. doi: 10.19779/j.cnki.2096-3602.2018.03.08. eCollection 2018 Aug.

本文引用的文献

1
Successful Revascularization, Angiosome Concept, and Multivessel Revascularization: Effects on Wound Healing: An Asian Perspective.血运重建成功、血管生成体概念和多血管血运重建:对伤口愈合的影响:亚洲视角。
Int J Low Extrem Wounds. 2024 Mar;23(1):12-18. doi: 10.1177/15347346231212330. Epub 2023 Nov 6.
2
Evaluation of the Angiosome Concept Using Near-Infrared Fluorescence Imaging with Indocyanine Green.应用近红外荧光成像技术联合吲哚菁绿评估血管生成体概念。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2023 Jul;93:283-290. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2023.01.006. Epub 2023 Jan 13.
3
Prognostic Value of Radiotracer-Based Perfusion Imaging in Critical Limb Ischemia Patients Undergoing Lower Extremity Revascularization.
放射性核素灌注成像对下肢血管重建术治疗的临界肢体缺血患者的预后价值。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021 Aug;14(8):1614-1624. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2020.09.033. Epub 2020 Nov 18.
4
Foot Angiosomes: Instructions for Use.足部脉管系统:使用说明。
Int J Low Extrem Wounds. 2020 Dec;19(4):293-304. doi: 10.1177/1534734620954745. Epub 2020 Sep 11.
5
Is Angiosome-Guided Endovascular Therapy Worthwhile?血管体引导下的血管内治疗是否值得?
Ann Vasc Dis. 2019 Sep 25;12(3):315-318. doi: 10.3400/avd.ra.19-00042.
6
Global Vascular Guidelines on the Management of Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia.全球血管指南:慢性肢体威胁性缺血的管理。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2019 Jul;58(1S):S1-S109.e33. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2019.05.006. Epub 2019 Jun 8.
7
Angiosome perfusion of the foot: An old theory or a new issue?足部血管体灌注:旧理论还是新问题?
Semin Vasc Surg. 2018 Jun-Dec;31(2-4):56-65. doi: 10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2018.12.002. Epub 2018 Dec 20.
8
Editor's Choice - A Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Between Primary Bypass and Secondary Bypass After Failed Plain Balloon Angioplasty in the Bypass versus Angioplasty for Severe Ischaemia of the Limb (BASIL) Trial.编辑精选 - 在旁路与血管成形术治疗肢体严重缺血试验(BASIL)中,初次球囊血管成形术失败后行主搭桥术与次搭桥术的临床结局比较。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2018 May;55(5):666-671. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2018.02.015. Epub 2018 Mar 27.
9
Quantitative Assessment of Coronary Microvascular Function: Dynamic Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography, Positron Emission Tomography, Ultrasound, Computed Tomography, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging.冠状动脉微血管功能的定量评估:动态单光子发射计算机断层扫描、正电子发射断层扫描、超声、计算机断层扫描和磁共振成像
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 Aug;10(8). doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.117.006427.
10
Angiosome-directed revascularization in patients with critical limb ischemia.针对严重肢体缺血患者的血管体区导向性血运重建
J Vasc Surg. 2017 Apr;65(4):1208-1219.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.10.100.