Fiorelli Alfonso, Leonardi Beatrice, Messina Gaetana, Luzzi Luca, Paladini Piero, Catelli Chiara, Minervini Fabrizio, Kestenholz Peter, Teodonio Leonardo, D'Andrilli Antonio, Rendina Erino Angelo, Natale Giovanni
Division of Thoracic Surgery, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 80131 Naples, Italy.
Lung Transplantation Unit, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy.
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Jan 31;16(3):605. doi: 10.3390/cancers16030605.
Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction (BLVR) is a minimally invasive treatment for emphysema. Lung cancer may be associated with emphysema due to common risk factors. Thus, a growing number of patients undergoing BLVR may develop lung cancer. Herein, we evaluated the effects of lung resection for non-small cell lung cancer in patients undergoing BLVR. The clinical data of patients undergoing BLVR followed by lung resection for NSCLC were retrospectively reviewed. For each patient, surgical and oncological outcomes were recorded to define the effects of this strategy. Eight patients were included in our series. In all cases but one, emphysema was localized within upper lobes; the tumor was detected during routine follow-up following BLVR and it did not involve the treated lobe. The comparison of pre- and post-BLVR data showed a significant improvement in FEV1 (29.7 ± 4.9 vs. 33.7 ± 6.7, = 0.01); in FVC (28.5 ± 6.6 vs. 32.4 ± 6.1, = 0.01); in DLCO (31.5 ± 4.9 vs. 38.7 ± 5.7, = 0.02); in 6MWT (237 ± 14 m vs. 271 ± 15 m, = 0.01); and a reduction in RV (198 ± 11 vs. 143 ± 9.8, = 0.01). Surgical resection of lung cancer included wedge resection ( = 6); lobectomy ( = 1); and segmentectomy ( = 1). No major complications were observed and the comparison of pre- and post-operative data showed no significant reduction in FEV1% (33.7 ± 6.7 vs. 31.5 ± 5.3; = 0.15) and in DLCO (38.7 ± 5.7 vs. 36.1 ± 5.4; = 0.15). Median survival was 35 months and no cancer relapses were observed. The improved lung function obtained with BLVR allowed nonsurgical candidates to undergo lung resection for lung cancer.
支气管镜下肺减容术(BLVR)是一种治疗肺气肿的微创方法。由于存在共同的风险因素,肺癌可能与肺气肿相关。因此,越来越多接受BLVR治疗的患者可能会发生肺癌。在此,我们评估了接受BLVR治疗的患者行非小细胞肺癌肺切除术的效果。对接受BLVR治疗后行NSCLC肺切除术患者的临床资料进行回顾性分析。记录每位患者的手术和肿瘤学结局,以确定该策略的效果。我们的系列研究纳入了8例患者。除1例患者外,所有患者的肺气肿均局限于上叶;肿瘤在BLVR后的常规随访中被发现,且未累及治疗的肺叶。BLVR前后数据比较显示,第1秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)有显著改善(29.7±4.9 vs. 33.7±6.7,P = 0.01);用力肺活量(FVC)有显著改善(28.5±6.6 vs. 32.4±6.1,P = 0.01);一氧化碳弥散量(DLCO)有显著改善(31.5±4.9 vs. 38.7±5.7,P = 0.02);6分钟步行试验(6MWT)有显著改善(237±14米 vs. 271±15米,P = 0.01);残气量(RV)减少(198±11 vs. 143±9.8,P = 0.01)。肺癌手术切除包括楔形切除术(n = 6);肺叶切除术(n = 1);和肺段切除术(n = 1)。未观察到严重并发症,手术前后数据比较显示FEV1%(33.7±6.7 vs. 31.5±5.3;P = 0.15)和DLCO(38.7±5.7 vs. 36.1±5.4;P = 0.15)无显著降低。中位生存期为35个月,未观察到癌症复发。BLVR所获得的肺功能改善使非手术候选患者能够接受肺癌肺切除术。