Department of orthopedics, The Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, Jiangsu, China.
Department of orthopedics, Yangzhou Jiangdu People's Hospital, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, China.
World Neurosurg. 2024 May;185:e357-e366. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.02.019. Epub 2024 Feb 10.
To establish a porcine osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture model and compare the impact of unilateral vertebroplasty using trajectory-adjustable bone cement filling device to traditional surgical tools on vertebral biomechanics.
Twenty-four fresh adult porcine vertebrae were used to establish an osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture model. The specimens were divided into 4 groups (A, B, C, and D), each consisting of 6 vertebrae. Group A served as the control group without vertebral augmentation (percutaneous vertebroplasty [PVP]). Patients in Group B underwent unilateral PVP using conventional surgical tools, while patients in Group C underwent bilateral PVP using the same tools. In Group D, patients underwent unilateral PVP with a trajectory-adjustable bone cement filling device. Postoperative X-ray examinations were performed to assess cement distribution and leakage. The compressive stiffness and strength of each spinal unit were evaluated using an electronic mechanical testing machine.
In Groups B, C, and D, the percentages of total cement distribution area were 32.83 ± 3.64%, 45.73 ± 2.27%, and 47.43 ± 3.51%, respectively. The values were significantly greater in Groups C and D than in Group B (P < 0.05), but there was no significant difference between Groups C and D (P > 0.05). The stiffness after vertebral augmentation in Groups B, C, and D was 1.04 ± 0.23 kN/mm, 1.11 ± 0.16 KN/mm, and 1.15 ± 0.13 KN/mm, respectively, which were significantly greater than that in Group A (0.46 ± 0.06 kN/mm; P < 0.05). The ultimate compressive strengths in Groups B, C, and D were 2.53 ± 0.21 MPa, 4.09 ± 0.30 MPa, and 3.99 ± 0.29 MPa, respectively, all surpassing Group A's strength of 1.41 ± 0.31 MPa. Additionally, both Groups C and D demonstrated significantly greater ultimate compressive strengths than Group B did (P < 0.05).
A trajectory-adjustable bone cement filling device was proven to be an effective approach for unilateral vertebroplasty, restoring the biomechanical properties of fractured vertebrae. Compared to traditional surgical tools, this approach is superior to unilateral puncture and yields outcomes comparable to those of bilateral puncture. Additionally, the device ensures a centrally symmetrical distribution pattern of bone cement, leading to improved morphology.
建立猪骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折模型,并比较可调轨道骨水泥填充装置单侧经皮椎体成形术与传统手术工具对椎体生物力学的影响。
将 24 个新鲜成年猪椎体用于建立骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折模型。标本分为 4 组(A、B、C 和 D),每组 6 个椎体。A 组为不进行椎体增强的对照组(经皮椎体成形术[PVP])。B 组患者采用传统手术工具行单侧 PVP,C 组患者采用相同工具行双侧 PVP。D 组患者采用可调轨道骨水泥填充装置行单侧 PVP。术后行 X 线检查评估骨水泥分布和渗漏情况。采用电子万能试验机评估每个脊柱单位的压缩刚度和强度。
B、C、D 组的总骨水泥分布面积百分比分别为 32.83±3.64%、45.73±2.27%和 47.43±3.51%,C、D 组明显高于 B 组(P<0.05),但 C、D 组之间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。B、C、D 组椎体增强后的刚度分别为 1.04±0.23kN/mm、1.11±0.16kN/mm和 1.15±0.13kN/mm,均明显大于 A 组(0.46±0.06kN/mm;P<0.05)。B、C、D 组的最大压缩强度分别为 2.53±0.21MPa、4.09±0.30MPa和 3.99±0.29MPa,均大于 A 组的 1.41±0.31MPa。此外,C、D 组的最大压缩强度均明显大于 B 组(P<0.05)。
可调轨道骨水泥填充装置在单侧经皮椎体成形术中是一种有效的方法,可恢复骨折椎体的生物力学性能。与传统手术工具相比,该方法优于单侧穿刺,且效果与双侧穿刺相当。此外,该装置可确保骨水泥呈中心对称分布,从而改善形态。