Department of Spine Surgery, Renmin Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, No.39 Middle Chaoyang Road, Shiyan, 442000, Hubei, China.
J Orthop Surg Res. 2020 Aug 6;15(1):302. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-01835-y.
There is no consensus on the best choice between high- and low-viscosity bone cement for percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP). This study aimed to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes and leakage between three cements with different viscosities in treating osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.
This is a prospective study comparing patients who were treated with PVP under local anesthesia: group A (n = 99, 107 vertebrae) with high-viscosity OSTEOPAL V cement, group B (n = 79, 100 vertebrae) with low-viscosity OSTEOPAL V cement, and group C (n = 88, 102 vertebrae) with low-viscosity Eurofix VTP cement. Postoperative pain severity was evaluated using the visual analog scale. Cement leakage was evaluated using radiography and computed tomography.
There was no significant difference in the incidence of cement leakage between the three groups (group A 20.6%, group B 24.2%, group C 20.6%, P = 0.767). All three groups showed significant reduction in postoperative pain scores but did not differ significantly in pain scores at postoperative 2 days (group A 2.01 ± 0.62, group B 2.15 ± 0.33, group C 1.92 ± 0.71, P = 0.646). During the 6 months after cement implantation, significantly less reduction in the fractured vertebral body height was noticed in group B and group C than in group A (group A 19.0%, group B 8.1%, group C 7.3%, P = 0.009).
Low-viscosity cement has comparable incidence of leakage compared to high-viscosity cement in PVP for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. It also can better prevent postoperative loss of fractured vertebral body's height.
经皮椎体成形术(PVP)中高黏度和低黏度骨水泥之间的最佳选择尚未达成共识。本研究旨在比较三种不同黏度的骨水泥在治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折中的临床和影像学结果及渗漏情况。
这是一项在局部麻醉下行 PVP 治疗的患者的前瞻性研究:A 组(n=99,107 个椎体)使用高黏度 OSTEOPAL V 骨水泥,B 组(n=79,100 个椎体)使用低黏度 OSTEOPAL V 骨水泥,C 组(n=88,102 个椎体)使用低黏度 Eurofix VTP 骨水泥。术后疼痛严重程度采用视觉模拟评分法评估。采用 X 线和 CT 评估骨水泥渗漏情况。
三组骨水泥渗漏发生率无统计学差异(A 组 20.6%,B 组 24.2%,C 组 20.6%,P=0.767)。三组术后疼痛评分均显著降低,但术后 2 天疼痛评分无显著差异(A 组 2.01±0.62,B 组 2.15±0.33,C 组 1.92±0.71,P=0.646)。在骨水泥植入后 6 个月内,B 组和 C 组椎体骨折高度的降低明显低于 A 组(A 组 19.0%,B 组 8.1%,C 组 7.3%,P=0.009)。
与 PVP 治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折的高黏度骨水泥相比,低黏度骨水泥渗漏发生率相当,且能更好地预防术后骨折椎体高度丢失。