Suppr超能文献

结肠镜检查与粪便免疫化学试验:哪个更好?

Colonoscopy vs the Fecal Immunochemical Test: Which is Best?

机构信息

VA Medical Center, White River Junction, Vermont; Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire.

Division of Gastroenterology/Hepatology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.

出版信息

Gastroenterology. 2024 May;166(5):758-771. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2023.12.027. Epub 2024 Feb 9.

Abstract

Although there is no debate around the effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening in reducing disease burden, there remains a question regarding the most effective and cost-effective screening modality. Current United States guidelines present a panel of options that include the 2 most commonly used modalities, colonoscopy and stool testing with the fecal immunochemical test (FIT). Large-scale comparative effectiveness trials comparing colonoscopy and FIT for colorectal cancer outcomes are underway, but results are not yet available. This review will separately state the "best case" for FIT and colonoscopy as the screening tool of first choice. In addition, the review will examine these modalities from a health economics perspective to provide the reader further context about the relative advantages of these commonly used tests.

摘要

虽然结直肠癌筛查在降低疾病负担方面的有效性没有争议,但对于最有效和最具成本效益的筛查方式仍存在疑问。目前的美国指南提出了一系列的选择方案,包括两种最常用的方式,结肠镜检查和粪便免疫化学试验(FIT)检测。正在进行大规模的比较结肠镜检查和 FIT 对结直肠癌结果的有效性试验,但结果尚未公布。本综述将分别说明 FIT 和结肠镜检查作为首选筛查工具的“最佳情况”。此外,本综述还将从卫生经济学的角度来检查这些方法,为读者提供有关这些常用检测方法相对优势的更多背景信息。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验