Suppr超能文献

胃肠道和肝胆胰恶性肿瘤手术后的急性术后疼痛管理技术、疗效及并发症:一项观察性研究。

Acute postoperative pain management techniques, their efficacy and complications after major gastrointestinal and hepato-pancreato-biliary cancer surgeries: An observational study.

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.

出版信息

J Perioper Pract. 2024 Jun;34(6):199-203. doi: 10.1177/17504589231224563. Epub 2024 Feb 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients undergoing major gastrointestinal (GI) surgery including hepato-pancreato-biliary (HPB) surgeries have large incisions, which cause severe acute postoperative pain that, if untreated, is associated with a higher incidence of postoperative morbidity and delayed recovery.

METHODOLOGY

Our study included all patients who underwent elective major upper GI and HPB surgeries from 1 January 2018 to 31 December 2018. The patients were divided into two groups: the epidural and the non-epidural group. The average and worst pain scores at rest and movement were compared between both groups. We also studied the effect of pain relief in the two groups and associated postoperative outcomes, resumption of feeding, ambulation, hospital stay and intensive care unit stay.

RESULTS

A total of 566 patients were included in the study, out of which 490 received epidurals, and the rest, 76, belonged to the non-epidural group (transversus abdominis plane, rectus sheath block or no regional analgesia technique). The median average pain score at rest and movement was 2.0 and 3.0, respectively, in the epidural and non-epidural groups. The postoperative outcomes showed no statistical difference.

CONCLUSION

The epidural group and the non-epidural group had similar pain scores, and the postoperative outcomes were also comparable.

摘要

背景

接受重大胃肠道(GI)手术的患者,包括肝胰胆(HPB)手术,都有较大的切口,这会导致严重的急性术后疼痛,如果不加以治疗,与更高的术后发病率和恢复延迟有关。

方法

我们的研究包括所有 2018 年 1 月 1 日至 2018 年 12 月 31 日期间接受择期上 GI 和 HPB 手术的患者。患者被分为两组:硬膜外组和非硬膜外组。比较两组患者在休息和活动时的平均和最差疼痛评分。我们还研究了两组的止痛效果以及相关的术后结果,包括恢复进食、活动、住院时间和重症监护病房停留时间。

结果

本研究共纳入 566 例患者,其中 490 例接受了硬膜外麻醉,其余 76 例(腹横肌平面、腹直肌鞘阻滞或无区域镇痛技术)属于非硬膜外组。硬膜外组和非硬膜外组在休息和活动时的平均疼痛评分中位数分别为 2.0 和 3.0。术后结果无统计学差异。

结论

硬膜外组和非硬膜外组的疼痛评分相似,术后结果也相当。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验