• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用不同鼻气流计头戴设备获得的鼻声计分数差异。

Differences in nasalance scores obtained with different Nasometer headsets.

作者信息

Bressmann Tim, Tang Blanche Hei Yung

机构信息

Department of Speech-Language Pathology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, Hong Kong University, Hong Kong, Hong Kong.

出版信息

Clin Linguist Phon. 2025 Apr-May;39(4-5):504-514. doi: 10.1080/02699206.2024.2305118. Epub 2024 Feb 12.

DOI:10.1080/02699206.2024.2305118
PMID:38346239
Abstract

The goal of the present research study was to investigate possible differences in nasalance scores between different Nasometer headgears. Frequency response characteristics of microphone pairs in a Nasometer model 6200, a model 6450 and two model 6500 headsets were compared using long-term average spectra of white noise and multi-speaker babble signals. Prerecorded sound files from a male and a female speaker were used to record nasalance scores with the four Nasometer headsets and to calculate cumulative absolute differences within and between the headsets. The main outcome measures were the cumulative absolute differences between the decibel (dB) values in the frequency bins from 300 to 750 Hz for the nasal and oral channels of each microphone pair. Cumulative absolute differences between nasalance scores of repeated stimuli within and across Nasometer headsets were tabulated. Results showed that cumulative absolute differences for the frequency range 300-750 Hz were between 6.58 and 7.68 dB. Within headsets, 95.6% to 100% of measurements of all four Nasometer headsets were within 3 nasalance points, although test-retest differences of up to 6 nasalance points were found. Between headsets, 56.1% to 98.9% of measurements were within 3 nasalance points, with the single largest difference of 8 nasalance points. In conclusion, differences between repeated nasalance scores obtained with the same and different headsets were noted. Clinicians should allow a margin of error of ±6 to 8 nasalance points when interpreting scores from different Nasometer headsets.

摘要

本研究的目的是调查不同鼻声计头带在鼻声率得分上可能存在的差异。使用白噪声和多说话者嘈杂信号的长期平均频谱,比较了鼻声计6200型、6450型以及两款6500型耳机中麦克风对的频率响应特性。使用来自一名男性和一名女性说话者的预录制声音文件,通过四种鼻声计耳机记录鼻声率得分,并计算耳机内部和之间的累积绝对差异。主要观察指标是每个麦克风对的鼻腔和口腔通道在300至750赫兹频率区间内分贝(dB)值之间的累积绝对差异。列出了鼻声计耳机内部和之间重复刺激的鼻声率得分的累积绝对差异。结果显示,300 - 750赫兹频率范围的累积绝对差异在6.58至7.68分贝之间。在耳机内部,所有四款鼻声计耳机95.6%至100%的测量值在3个鼻声率点以内,不过发现重测差异高达6个鼻声率点。在耳机之间,56.1%至98.9%的测量值在3个鼻声率点以内,最大差异为8个鼻声率点。总之,注意到使用相同和不同耳机获得的重复鼻声率得分之间存在差异。临床医生在解释来自不同鼻声计耳机的得分时,应允许±6至8个鼻声率点的误差范围。

相似文献

1
Differences in nasalance scores obtained with different Nasometer headsets.使用不同鼻气流计头戴设备获得的鼻声计分数差异。
Clin Linguist Phon. 2025 Apr-May;39(4-5):504-514. doi: 10.1080/02699206.2024.2305118. Epub 2024 Feb 12.
2
Effects of different calibration schedules on the test-retest differences of nasalance scores obtained with the Nasometer 6450.不同定标方案对 Nasometer 6450 获得的鼻声图测试-重测差值的影响。
Clin Linguist Phon. 2022 Mar 4;36(2-3):292-300. doi: 10.1080/02699206.2021.1974094. Epub 2021 Sep 23.
3
Comparison of nasalance scores obtained with the Nasometer, the NasalView, and the OroNasal System.使用鼻声计、鼻内镜和口鼻系统获得的鼻声测量分数的比较。
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2005 Jul;42(4):423-33. doi: 10.1597/03-029.1.
4
Covering Nasometer Microphones with Plastic Wrap for Infection Control Increases Retest Variability of Nasalance Scores.用塑料包装覆盖 Nasometer 麦克风以进行感染控制会增加 Nasalance 评分的复测变异性。
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2022 Oct;59(10):1314-1318. doi: 10.1177/10556656211051582. Epub 2021 Nov 23.
5
Comparison of nasalance scores obtained with the nasometers 6200 and 6450.
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2014 Jan;51(1):90-7. doi: 10.1597/12-202. Epub 2013 Apr 3.
6
Normative nasalance scores for Vietnamese-speaking children.说越南语儿童的标准鼻音计分数
Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2019 Jul;44(2):51-57. doi: 10.1080/14015439.2017.1389985. Epub 2017 Oct 26.
7
Effects of computer system and vowel loading on measures of nasalance.计算机系统和元音负荷对鼻共鸣度测量值的影响。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2011 Oct;54(5):1284-94. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2011/10-0201). Epub 2011 Apr 15.
8
Normative nasalance scores for Estonian children.爱沙尼亚儿童的标准鼻声计评分
Clin Linguist Phon. 2018;32(11):1054-1066. doi: 10.1080/02699206.2018.1495767. Epub 2018 Jul 9.
9
Comparison of nasalance scores obtained from the Nasometer and the NasalView.比较通过鼻音计和鼻视图获得的鼻声度得分。
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2003 Jan;40(1):40-5. doi: 10.1597/1545-1569_2003_040_0040_consof_2.0.co_2.
10
Comparison between perceptual assessments of nasality and nasalance scores.鼻音的感知评估与鼻共鸣值的比较。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2012 Sep-Oct;47(5):556-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-6984.2012.00165.x. Epub 2012 Jul 25.