Melbourne Medical School, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Department of Clinical Forensic Medicine, Victorian Institute of Forensic Medicine, Victoria, Australia.
Med Sci Law. 2024 Oct;64(4):319-328. doi: 10.1177/00258024241229830. Epub 2024 Feb 12.
:The COVID-19 pandemic prompted significant challenges in clinical forensic medicine and forensic psychiatry and emphasised the need for sustainable service delivery. Both fields faced difficulties in maintaining services due to COVID-19 precautions and limited referrals. This review examined the changes in forensic practices, aiming to understand their impact and learn from them to inform future strategies. : A search was conducted across Ovid Medline, Ovid Embase, Ovid Emcare and PubMed, and webpages of governments and other organisations. Studies were included if they assessed any change that occurred in clinical forensic medicine or forensic psychiatry during the pandemic. A narrative review with a systematic approach was undertaken. : A total of 27 articles were included. There was a notable decrease in the volume of forensic assessments in early 2020. The numbers gradually rebounded with the easing of restrictions yet have not fully returned to pre COVID-19 levels. Telemedicine and COVID-19 precautions were widely incorporated into forensic services, which were seen to disrupt the patient-doctor dynamics, restrict the setting of examinations and complicate work processes and sample handling steps. : This is the first review that describes the pandemic-driven changes in clinical forensic medicine and forensic psychiatry in respect of case trends and incorporation of COVID-19 precautions. The pandemic emphasised the need for adaptability and adoption of new assessment approaches in forensic services. Technology, like telemedicine, emerged as a valuable tool, enhancing accessibility for individuals in remote or high-risk areas. It is necessary to review the changes and re-evaluate their impacts in the post COVID-19 era.
: COVID-19 大流行给临床法医和法医精神病学带来了重大挑战,并强调了可持续提供服务的必要性。由于 COVID-19 预防措施和转介有限,这两个领域都难以维持服务。本综述考察了法医实践的变化,旨在了解其影响,并从中吸取教训,为未来的策略提供信息。: 对 Ovid Medline、Ovid Embase、Ovid Emcare 和 PubMed 以及政府和其他组织的网页进行了检索。如果研究评估了大流行期间临床法医或法医精神病学中发生的任何变化,则将其纳入研究。采用系统方法进行叙述性综述。: 共纳入 27 篇文章。2020 年初,法医评估数量明显减少。随着限制的放宽,数量逐渐回升,但尚未完全恢复到 COVID-19 之前的水平。远程医疗和 COVID-19 预防措施已广泛纳入法医服务,这被认为破坏了医患动态,限制了检查环境,并使工作流程和样本处理步骤复杂化。: 这是第一篇描述 COVID-19 大流行对临床法医和法医精神病学中案例趋势和 COVID-19 预防措施变化的综述。大流行强调了在法医服务中需要适应性和采用新的评估方法。技术,如远程医疗,已成为一种有价值的工具,增强了远程或高风险地区个人的可及性。有必要审查这些变化,并在后 COVID-19 时代重新评估其影响。