Suppr超能文献

预防性敷料对减少压力性损伤的影响:一种基于聚合物的皮肤模型。

Effect of prophylactic dressings to reduce pressure injuries: a polymer-based skin model.

机构信息

Research Center for Implementation Nursing Science Initiative, School of Health Sciences, Fujita Health University, Aichi, Japan.

Biotechnology Group, Tokyo Metropolitan Industrial Technology Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

J Wound Care. 2024 Feb 1;33(Sup2):S4-S9. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2024.33.Sup2.S4.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluated the effect of pressure injury (PI) prophylactic dressings used for patients at high risk of PI development to reduce friction, shear force and pressure, and their combined force, in an original polymer-based skin model.

METHOD

A low-friction outer-layer hydrocolloid (LFH) dressing and a multilayered silicone foam (MSF) dressing were used. Before application, compression and friction properties were measured. Our original experimental model-the 'simulated skin-shearing test'-consisted of: a weight; a polyurethane-based skin model containing a three-axis tactile sensor; dressings; a table covered with bedsheets; and a mechanical tester, by which the interface friction force, internal shear force and pressure were measured continuously during skin model movements. An estimated combined force generated by internal shear and pressure was represented as a vector. A model with no dressing was used as a control.

RESULTS

The LFH dressing had significantly higher compression strength versus the MSF dressing. In contrast, the dynamic coefficient of friction was lower for the LFH dressing versus the MSF dressing (p<0.05). In simulated skin-shearing test results, shear forces were 0.45N and 0.42N for LFH and MSF dressings, respectively, with no significant difference. The estimated combined force was lower for the MSF dressing compared with that of the LFH dressing and control.

CONCLUSION

The shear force-reducing effect in the skin model was equivalent between the LFH and MSF dressings. However, the MSF dressing significantly reduced the force generated by a combination of internal shear force and pressure compared with the LFH dressing.

摘要

目的

本研究评估了用于高危压疮(PI)发展患者的 PI 预防敷料的效果,以降低原始聚合物皮肤模型中摩擦力、剪切力和压力及其组合力。

方法

使用低摩擦外层水胶体(LFH)敷料和多层硅酮泡沫(MSF)敷料。在应用之前,测量压缩和摩擦性能。我们的原始实验模型——“模拟皮肤剪切试验”——包括:一个重量;一个包含三轴触觉传感器的基于聚氨酯的皮肤模型;敷料;覆盖有床单的桌子;和机械试验机,通过该试验机,在皮肤模型运动过程中连续测量界面摩擦力、内部剪切力和压力。内部剪切和压力产生的估计组合力表示为一个向量。使用没有敷料的模型作为对照。

结果

LFH 敷料的压缩强度明显高于 MSF 敷料。相比之下,LFH 敷料的动态摩擦系数低于 MSF 敷料(p<0.05)。在模拟皮肤剪切试验结果中,LFH 和 MSF 敷料的剪切力分别为 0.45N 和 0.42N,无显著差异。与 LFH 敷料和对照相比,MSF 敷料的估计组合力较低。

结论

在皮肤模型中,LFH 和 MSF 敷料的减剪切力效果相当。然而,与 LFH 敷料相比,MSF 敷料显著降低了由内部剪切力和压力组合产生的力。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验