Suppr超能文献

通过伤口敷料提高剪切力对皮肤活力的影响。

Improving the effect of shear on skin viability with wound dressings.

作者信息

de Wert L A, Schoonhoven L, Stegen J H C H, Piatkowski A A, Hulst R R van der, Poeze M, Bouvy N D

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre (MUMC+), Maastricht, The Netherlands; NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, The Netherlands.

Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom; Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2016 Jul;60:505-514. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.03.006. Epub 2016 Mar 16.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pressure ulcers are a major healthcare problem and caused by pressure and shear-forces. Although shear-force is understood to be a major contributing factor, no preventive interventions are specifically aimed at relieving the effect of shear on skin to improve skin viability.

METHODS

A physical model was used to apply a combined loading of 2.4kPa pressure and 14.5N shear-force on skin in humans. Loading was applied on the volar aspect of both forearms for 30min in ten healthy volunteers. One arm received loading on skin with a wound dressing, the other arm (control) received loading directly on skin. The following parameters were determined before and after loading: IL-1α/Total Protein-ratio (used as a measure of skin damage); Cutaneous blood cell flux ((CBF) measure of reactive hyperaemia); Lactate concentration (measure of tissue ischemia). Three different dressings were tested on three different days. The order of dressing application, dressing arm and start of the intervention were randomized.

RESULTS

Participants mean age was 22.5±1.6 year with a BMI of 22.3±2.4kg/m(2). IL-1α/Total Protein-ratio of the skin was significantly lower after the application of pressure and shear when the Mepilex® (P<0.01), Allevyn (P<0.05) or Aquacel(TM) dressing (P<0.01) was used compared with the control measurement. The Mepilex® dressing was more effective in reducing post-load IL-1α/Total Protein-ratio compared to the Allevyn dressing (P<0.01). Post-load CBF was significantly lower when the Mepilex® or Aquacel dressing was used (P<0.001). Both dressings induced significantly less post-load CBF than the Allevyn dressing (P<0.01 and P<0.001, respectively). The concentration of lactate was not significantly increased after the application of pressure and shear and could not be used as a measure with this model.

CONCLUSION

This is the first in vivo study to demonstrate that the effects of pressure in combination with shear on skin viability can be improved with foam dressings. In this study, the multi-layered dressings perform better than the single-layered dressing.

摘要

背景

压疮是一个主要的医疗保健问题,由压力和剪切力引起。虽然剪切力被认为是一个主要的促成因素,但没有专门针对减轻剪切力对皮肤的影响以提高皮肤活力的预防性干预措施。

方法

使用物理模型对人体皮肤施加2.4kPa压力和14.5N剪切力的联合负荷。在十名健康志愿者的双侧前臂掌侧施加负荷30分钟。一只手臂在有伤口敷料的皮肤上施加负荷,另一只手臂(对照)直接在皮肤上施加负荷。在负荷前后测定以下参数:白细胞介素-1α/总蛋白比值(用作皮肤损伤的指标);皮肤血细胞通量(反应性充血的指标);乳酸浓度(组织缺血的指标)。在三个不同的日子测试了三种不同的敷料。敷料应用顺序、敷料手臂和干预开始时间均随机化。

结果

参与者的平均年龄为22.5±1.6岁,体重指数为22.3±2.4kg/m²。与对照测量相比,使用美皮康(P<0.01)、爱立敷(P<0.05)或藻酸盐敷料(P<0.01)时,施加压力和剪切力后皮肤的白细胞介素-1α/总蛋白比值显著降低。与爱立敷敷料相比,美皮康敷料在降低负荷后白细胞介素-1α/总蛋白比值方面更有效(P<0.01)。使用美皮康或藻酸盐敷料时,负荷后皮肤血细胞通量显著降低(P<0.00)。两种敷料引起的负荷后皮肤血细胞通量均明显低于爱立敷敷料(分别为P<0.01和P<0.001)。施加压力和剪切力后,乳酸浓度没有显著增加,因此不能用该模型作为测量指标。

结论

这是第一项体内研究,证明泡沫敷料可以改善压力与剪切力联合作用对皮肤活力的影响。在本研究中,多层敷料比单层敷料表现更好。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验