Suppr超能文献

面对面教学与灵活翻转课堂在医学和牙科学员临床生物化学教学中的比较:来自伊朗的准实验研究。

Comparison of the teaching clinical biochemistry in face-to-face and the flex-flipped classroom to medical and dental students: a quasi-experimental study from IRAN.

机构信息

Department of E-Learning in Medical Sciences, Virtual School and Center of Excellence in E-Learning, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.

Autophagy Research Center, Department of Biochemistry, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Zand Street, Shiraz, Iran.

出版信息

BMC Med Educ. 2024 Feb 13;24(1):137. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05051-8.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Biochemistry is one of the main courses of basic sciences in the medical curriculum, along with other difficult subjects that are difficult to learn. The emergence of new technologies has made it possible to test new methods such as e-Learning. In this study, we compared two methods of Flex-Flipped Classroom (FFC) and face-to-face.

METHOD

A quasi-experimental research was done which involved both medical and dental students studying the clinical biochemistry course in the joint semester in 2019. A total of 100 medical students were trained in biochemistry through face-to-face teaching, and 60 dental students were trained in the same course through the FFC model. Three researcher-made tools were used to compare the two groups to assess the student's satisfaction, scores, and self-evaluation. The content validity of the tools was checked using the opinions of 10 experts through the CVI index. The results were analyzed using one-sample t-tests, independent t-tests, and ANOVA.

RESULTS

Both groups scored significantly more than the cut-off-point (Mean > 3.5) in their average scores of the total and sub-components of the self-evaluation questionnaire (P < 0.05). Face-to-face teaching was viewed more favorably than the FFC teaching except for considering the flexibility (4.14 ± 1.55), but the difference was not significant (P > 0.05). The students' knowledge score in the FFC was slightly higher than that in the face-to-face method, but this difference was not significant(P = 0.758).

CONCLUSION

Both face-to-face and FFC methods were effective according to the students, but the level of satisfaction with the face-to-face method was higher. It seems that teacher-student interaction is an important factor in students' preferences. However, the students preferred the flexibility of multimedia. It seems necessary to use the advantages of each method in a model appropriate to the students' conditions and available facilities.

摘要

简介

生物化学是医学课程基础科学的主要课程之一,与其他难以学习的科目一起。新技术的出现使得测试新方法成为可能,例如电子学习。在这项研究中,我们比较了 Flex-Flipped 教室 (FFC) 和面对面两种方法。

方法

这是一项准实验研究,涉及 2019 年联合学期学习临床生物化学课程的医学生和牙医学生。通过面对面教学对 100 名医学生进行生物化学培训,通过 FFC 模式对 60 名牙医学生进行相同课程的培训。使用三种研究人员制作的工具来比较两组,以评估学生的满意度、成绩和自我评价。使用 CVI 指数对 10 名专家的意见检查工具的内容有效性。使用单样本 t 检验、独立 t 检验和 ANOVA 分析结果。

结果

两组的平均总分和自我评价问卷的子成分的平均分均显着高于临界值(Mean>3.5)(P<0.05)。除了考虑灵活性(4.14±1.55)外,面对面教学比 FFC 教学更受欢迎,但差异不显着(P>0.05)。FFC 中的学生知识得分略高于面对面方法,但差异不显着(P=0.758)。

结论

根据学生的反馈,面对面和 FFC 两种方法都是有效的,但面对面方法的满意度水平更高。似乎师生互动是学生偏好的一个重要因素。然而,学生更喜欢多媒体的灵活性。似乎有必要根据学生的条件和可用设施,使用每种方法的优势来建立适合的模型。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdac/10863239/20f42e65da91/12909_2024_5051_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验