Suppr超能文献

慢性肝病患者中四种肌肉减少症筛查工具的性能比较。

Comparison of the performance of four screening tools for sarcopenia in patients with chronic liver disease.

作者信息

Yu Ting, Liu Shanshan, Zhao Jing, Jiang Yan, Deng Rong

机构信息

Department of Evidence-based Nursing Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University/West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Department of Nursing, West China Hospital, Sichuan University/West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

出版信息

Int J Nurs Sci. 2023 Dec 31;11(1):3-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2023.12.014. eCollection 2024 Jan.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Early identification of sarcopenia in patients with chronic liver disease is crucial for patient management and prevention of severe complications. We aimed to assess the effectiveness of Ishii score, Strength, Assistance with Walking, Rise from a Chair, Climb Stairs and Falls (SARC-F), SARC-F and Calf Circumference (SARC-CalF), and Mini Sarcopenia Risk Assessment-7 (MSRA-7) to screen sarcopenia in patients with chronic liver disease.

METHODS

This prospective study included patients with chronic liver disease in the infectious department of a tertiary hospital in Sichuan, China. Ishii score, SARC-F, SARC-CalF, and MSRA-7 were used to screen for sarcopenia risk. Sarcopenia was diagnosed according to the Asian Myometriosis Working Group (AWGS) 2019, which was used as the gold standard to compare the performance of the four screening tools. We completed clinical registration on the Chinese Clinical Trial Registration website (ChiCTR2100043910).

RESULTS

A total of 366 patients with chronic liver disease (22.4% women, mean age 48.96 ± 11.88 years) were evaluated. Based on the AWGS 2019 standard, the prevalence of sarcopenia in patients with chronic liver disease was 17.5%. Among all participants, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) produced an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.82 for Ishii score (sensitivity 85.94%, specificity 78.15%), 0.53 for SARC-F (sensitivity 6.25%, specificity 99.34%), 0.64 for SARC-CalF (sensitivity 45.31%, specificity 83.11%), and 0.55 for MSRA-7 (sensitivity 87.50%, specificity 22.85%). Based on AUC, decision curve analysis, and calibration curves, we concluded that Ishii score was the most accurate screening tool and was superior to the other tools.

CONCLUSIONS

Ishii score is more suitable for screening sarcopenia in patients with chronic liver disease than the SARC-F, SARC-CalF, and MSRA-7, based on the AWGS 2019 criteria. Nursing professionals can use Ishii score as a clinical tool to screen for sarcopenia in patients with chronic liver disease, providing an indication cue for the final diagnosis of sarcopenia, improving diagnostic efficiency, and enabling early identification and prevention of complications resulting from sarcopenia.

摘要

目的

早期识别慢性肝病患者的肌肉减少症对于患者管理和预防严重并发症至关重要。我们旨在评估石井评分、肌肉力量、行走辅助、从椅子上站起、爬楼梯及跌倒(SARC-F)、SARC-F与小腿围度(SARC-CalF)以及微型肌肉减少症风险评估-7(MSRA-7)在筛查慢性肝病患者肌肉减少症方面的有效性。

方法

这项前瞻性研究纳入了中国四川一家三级医院感染科的慢性肝病患者。使用石井评分、SARC-F、SARC-CalF和MSRA-7来筛查肌肉减少症风险。根据亚洲肌肉减少症工作组(AWGS)2019年标准诊断肌肉减少症,该标准用作比较这四种筛查工具性能的金标准。我们在中国临床试验注册网站(ChiCTR2100043910)上完成了临床注册。

结果

共评估了366例慢性肝病患者(女性占22.4%,平均年龄48.96±11.88岁)。根据AWGS 2019标准,慢性肝病患者中肌肉减少症的患病率为17.5%。在所有参与者中,受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线下面积(AUC)对于石井评分为0.82(敏感性85.94%,特异性78.15%),对于SARC-F为0.53(敏感性6.25%,特异性99.34%),对于SARC-CalF为0.64(敏感性45.31%,特异性83.11%),对于MSRA-7为0.55(敏感性87.50%,特异性22.85%)。基于AUC、决策曲线分析和校准曲线,我们得出结论,石井评分是最准确的筛查工具,优于其他工具。

结论

根据AWGS 2019标准,与SARC-F、SARC-CalF和MSRA-7相比,石井评分更适合筛查慢性肝病患者的肌肉减少症。护理专业人员可将石井评分用作筛查慢性肝病患者肌肉减少症的临床工具,为肌肉减少症的最终诊断提供指示线索,提高诊断效率,并实现对肌肉减少症所致并发症的早期识别和预防。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3042/10859570/61a303fc723a/gr1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验