MALDI-MS in first-line screening of newborns for sickle cell disease: results from a prospective study in comparison to HPLC.

OBJECTIVES

Newborn screening (NBS) for sickle cell disease (SCD) requires a robust, high-throughput method to detect hemoglobin S (HbS). Screening for SCD is performed by qualitative methods, such as isoelectric focusing (IEF), and both qualitative and quantitative methods such as high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), capillary electrophoresis (CE), and tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS). All these methods detect HbS, as well as low-level or absent HbA, and also other variants of hemoglobin. HPLC is considered as a reference method for NBS, because of its high sensitivity and specificity in detecting HbS. NeoSickle, a fully automated matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) platform, combined with automated sample processing, a laboratory information management system and NeoSickle software for automatic data interpretation, has increased the throughput of SCD testing. The purpose of this study was to compare the performances of NeoSickle and HPLC.

METHODS

A prospective study was conducted including 9,571 samples from the NBS program to compare MALDI-MS using NeoSickle with an HPLC method. Correlation between the two methods was studied. For the MALDI-MS method, sensitivity, specificity, NPV, and PPV were calculated.

RESULTS

We found over 99.4 % correlation between the HPLC and MALDI-MS results. NeoSickle showed 100 % of sensitivity and specificity in detecting SCD syndrome, leading to positive and negative predictive values of 100 %.

CONCLUSIONS

NeoSickle is adapted to NBS for SCD, and can be used in first-line high-throughput screening to detect HbS, and beta-thalassemia major warning. When HbS is detected, second-line use of another specific method as HPLC is necessary.